In the opposition

Do not complicate

April 1, 2010 Alexander Osovtsov

There are very simple things for understanding, they say about those that there is nothing to understand here. For example, when, after the next terrorist attacks in Moscow, Patrushev mutters something about the “Georgian trace”, then there is no reason for the reaction. If it is sinful to laugh at the wretched ones, then analyzing them nonsense does not make sense. It is also very easy for me to explain to the respected L. Radzikhovsky that he may have written “a thousand times”, “that Putin is very much to replace”, but I specifically quoted his text where a slightly different position was traced. As then, and now I have been gloomily forced everything. Other texts and performances of Leonid, in which he wrote about the need for Putin’s departure, I, until the end of March, T.G. I didn’t meet-maybe I missed something, my situational opponent is a very talented and prolific author. But, once again, to protect myself in this case, for example, is very simple to me - I gave an accurate quote from one of the texts of Radzikhovsky, albeit one of many, but an authentic quote from an authentic text.

And there are very complex questions, which, in general, have no rational answers. And although they sometimes reproach me with a simplified logical centric perception of the world, for example, I perfectly understood the nature of L.M. Alekseeva, who changed her plans for the evening of March 31. Indeed, there are a lot of complicated thoughts and feelings: the desire and need to support “strategy-31”; The pain and bitterness caused by new dozens of innocent victims, which fell in mutually terrorist war; The squeamishness and aversion to the pro -Kremlin scum, which arranged two days after the explosions in Moscow and on the day of the explosions in Kizlyar, the Gulyanka in one of the central squares of the capital of Russia. At the same time, it is very symptomatic that Alekseeva did not consider, apparently, the opportunity to spend the evening at home, visiting or in some kind of safe place. And, as it turned out, there really are no other safe places for her in Moscow. Not on the triumphal, but in the subway, at the Park of Culture Park, a drunken bastard who later dared to call himself a patriot, hit Lyudmila Mikhailovna on the head.

It is foolish to give this geek and his crime moral assessments. I want to pay attention to something else. After the cops once used violence against Alekseeva on the triumphal, a big noise rose. In the next 31st human rights activist, as far as I remember, the officer outfit, led by the colonel, guarded. What do you think, after what happened on Monday, what security measures were taken in Moscow in general, in the Moscow metro in particular, at the station “Park of Culture especially? Most likely the maximum. And in the conditions of all and all kinds of strengthening, in one of the most protected places very guarded by 31st, Alekseev is not a martyr, not a prepared terrorist, but just a drunken hooligan hits the head. It turns out that the cops can commit violence against Alekseeva, but even after the scandal, even after what happened, even in this place on this day, is still not able to protect against violence. In this regard, a prohibitively simple question: can cops protect at least someone from at least something? And even easier: is there Alekseeva (and other) the difference, who beats them for them, taxpayers?

Events on March 29-31, with all their heterogeneity and incompetition according to most parameters, have greatly simplified many issues. With terrorists, everything is always clear - these are enemies and monsters. With the cops (and, as they say, “amusements”) and their ability to fight crime in general and terrorism in particular and earlier, judging by the level of confidence in Russians, everything was clear. With those who have already become the norm to call the “jubilant gopota”, too, although they had some defenders. I can’t imagine what their southeiredfuhrer, the first deputy head of AP V. Surkov, can say badly what in this situation. Most likely, he will keep silent. Because earlier the question was whether he was really an intellectual, doubted, and after the fact that Surkov made in the last Wednesday, the situation in this sense became much easier.

It is still difficult to imagine what else should happen so that the majority, preferably significant, citizens of Russia seriously realize that the situation in the country has been simplified to the limit? When about fifty of our fellow citizens were killed, according to power, those terrorists, with whom, as the same power assured many times, has long been over. When the Minister of Finance announces the country's entering the external loan market. On the same days and watches - a disco on the triumphal due to the budget. And a discussion of the results of the Olympiad in Vancouver in the Federation Council. Well, what else can there be any questions - at least complex, even simple?

And this is the easiest question.

Photos of RIA Novosti