Dear editors!
Heating, melting snow - not so much time remains until the moment when spring enters its rights. Coronavirus in our country, unlike many European countries, which cover the second, or even third waves, is under tight control. Vladimir Vladimirovich finally vaccinated. All this, dear colleagues, cannot but cause me a surge of strength and joy.
But of course, some events somewhat spoil a good mood. In my beloved university there is everything that is needed for work and study, we are led by an outstanding, wonderful, tested, tested by the rector. But, as usual, and in our large family not without freaks. I wrote about such a letter in the past, forced to write in this.
But I'll start a few from afar. At one time, the Stalinist plan for the transformation of nature was adopted, aimed at changing the climatic conditions in the vast territories of the country. Within the framework of this plan, large -scale protective forest stripes were planted and work was carried out to create irrigation systems. The country abandoned huge forces to protect agricultural lands from the Sukhovoys, to increase the yield of grain crops. Unfortunately, plans were not fully implemented: the bald “exposure to the cult” who came to power actually turned the work according to the great plan, launching, as they said then, Gagarin and agriculture.
So, now, in fact, the Great Putin plan for reforming education is being implemented, which began with the 5–100 program designed to promote our leading universities in world ratings. Despite the fact that the direct goal of the 5–100 program was not achieved, one cannot deny the fact that it fundamentally changed approaches to the development of Russian universities that adopted a challenge to global competition quoted by the world community. She is being replaced by the even more magnificent Priority 2030 program, which was called the “Strategic Academic Leadership Program” in projects. Its goals are the updating, development and implementation of new educational programs, the development of the personnel potential of Russian higher education, the development of material and technical conditions for the implementation of educational, scientific, creative and even socio-humanitarian activities of educational organizations ... There is no doubt that this program will ensure that this program will ensure the balanced development of science and higher education in all regions of Russia!
And I hope that any next bald reformer will not interfere with the implementation of this innovation program: our people gave Vladimir Vladimirovich the right and, in fact, the order to lead the country after 2024! However, in such a decisive, fateful time there are young and not very people who breed nagging about and without. Not so long ago, I heard about the petition, which was initiated by “representatives of the university community - teachers, students, graduate students, employees and graduates of Moscow State University named after MV Lomonosov, as well as caring citizens.” The authors of the petition "are concerned about the illegal work on the dismantling of genuine surviving interiors of historical audiences." They talk about the "pogrom" in a large biological audience and other premises of the biofac, in the audiences of the mehmat, about the dismantling of "panels veneered by valuable rocks".
Ashamed, dear! It is necessary to look where the vector of our development is directed, and not cling to the old and obsolete. It is such retrograde, like you, pose a threat to the implementation of our ambitious plans for the development of education, science and innovation. Poprazing the famous professor: devastation is not in panels, devastation in the heads. In yours, colleagues, heads. From the usual expensive repairs, the purpose of which is to give a more modern appearance to our university, you do a tragedy.
I repeat, we must clearly realize that it is precisely such posters on the outgoing, in all kinds of cut -out “cherry gardens”, and there is a brake in the path of progress. It is even a little surprising to me that not a very young person acts as a visionary and innovator, and some representatives of our youth are so conservative. I understand when representatives of the primitive tribe adhere to such views, who must sow rice certainly as the cultural hero of the Tumba Yumba who taught people who taught people to agriculture is captured by their religious prejudices. But students, but graduate students of Moscow State University, desperately clinging to the old, are just some kind of nonsense!
Your Ivan Ekonomov