In uniform

The fence in the ocean

April 7, 2016 Nikolai Svanidze

The story with Panamanian offshore documents is interesting, first of all, by a reaction to it. After all, it is clear that if there are offshores, then someone needs it. And it is necessary, presumably, people are not the poorest, and therefore, including well -known and influential. It was clear that in the end it would be opened, it would become clear - if not everything, then a lot. And many famous, influential people will be in an undesirable focus of public attention. The question is how to behave in a similar situation, how to react.

You can like the Chinese. On the third day, say: no comment. And point. Documents, and there are, as you know, a lot, have not yet been published. So, there is time to stand a pause, keep your face and think through words and actions.

We can say: “Thank you for the signal”, and start the investigation, and serious, because not only in Britain, Iceland, France, the Netherlands, but also in India, Brazil, etc., etc. There is a strong opposition that will not allow this investigation to stall. Yes, someone will suffer. Here the Icelandic prime minister has already resigned. And someone will win, the political pendulum will swing, and the country will go further.

This business is already called "Panamamheyite." By consonance with Watergate, a scandal that in the early 70s of the last century in the States forced President Nixon to leave. And the Americans are proud of this scandal as a victory in the war: here, they say, our constitution works.

In Russia, according to our so -called political stability, this scandal does not hit at all. Just by. Unlike, say, from Ukraine. Because President Poroshenko in Panama papers is called directly by name in connection with his candy empire, and his rating is incomparably lower than the rating of President Putin.

Why do we have such a strange, some kind of nervous protective reaction?

The head of a large financial company, a banker, rushes to defend Putin's honor. Well, why a banker? And why he says: "Putin is not directly mentioned in publications." Yes, we already know that it is not mentioned, why burst into the open door! This makes a strange impression. The impression is the opposite to the desired.

And the presidential spokesman begins to talk about Western Putinophobia and the fact that nothing new is open, and there are no details. So I wonder what details Peskov expected and what other details should we all wait with him?

And the same thing - about the intrigues of the West, about “the stuffing of poison in order to influence the result of our elections” - follows from the mouth of the lady - the chairman of the Duma anti -corruption committee. I imagine the faces of our sincere adherers, sympathizers in the West, even sympathizers of President Putin personally! It is written on their faces: “And this says the main parliamentary fighter with corruption? Well, Russia is a country of miracles! Oh, Those Russianans! "

Well, it is impossible to say in complete seriousness, without risking everyone to laugh that everything that is happening around, from publications in the world's largest media to global climate change, is organized from a single center and for a single purpose - to make the dirty tricks to us and President Putin. Well, well, suppose, you can get some information out of some reasons. Having hacking, in one way or another, electronic protection. And charge this information by the authoritative world publications. Suppose. Get and charge. But to fake, to falsify more than 11 million documents can not be able to any Russophobe, nor Soros, or the organization, nor the country. This is not an operational shooting of an intimate date with a show on the TV channel in the prime time. It is simply impossible. And if it is impossible, if the documents are not faked, then no matter what they are thrown and why. It doesn't matter. This is a given, this is a failed fact. If, say, it suddenly opens that the wheel in due time, as later the Internet, was invented exclusively to put Russia to Russia, then this information is now interested only in the magazine Science and Life.

And now this: you say - there was nothing, but you - a payment. You say - not mine, but to you - a scan of a passport.

But I repeat: in Russia we will not have any consequences. If the presidential spokesman said: “Nothing new,” then nothing new. So, the Prosecutor General’s Office will not find anything.

And the voter will not find anything. Panama papers will not affect the result of the elections. Our voter does not read either Zyuddeche Zeitung or the “cordian”, does not look either Bi or ard. And on the Internet he does not climb for serious information. And what such an offshore does not really know. And from the information that will reach him, he would understand one thing: he correctly believed that businessmen are rods and bastards. And one is hope - to the native state and the president. So that he quickly nationalizes everything, that is, he took away and divided.

Obviously, these publications of the largest media are not for Russia, but for the world. This is the first. The second one is also obvious: the world is one and as transparent as it has never been. And you just need to give yourself a report in this, and trying to fence yourself in the middle of the ocean is pointless.

Although no one canceled meaningless actions.

In order to save money and optimize personnel policy, it would be nice to train fighters of the National Guard to play the cello.

Photo: Manifestation with a demand for a resignation due to a scandal with the offshore of the Prime Minister of Iceland S. Gyunnlegsson in Reykjavik . Brynjar Gunnasrson / Ap / Tass