Dissertation with ears

Last week, the attention of the Dissernet community was drawn to the Decree of President Vladimir Putin “On the approval of members of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation”. And, oh horror! Among the new members of the Public Chamber, our old acquaintance, the chairman of the Presidium of the All -Russian Public Organization for the Development of the Patriotic Law Law Society “Officers of Russia”, Anton Vladimirovich Tsvetkov, was discovered. Examination of the dissertation of the candidate of political sciences A.V. Tsvetkova appeared on the website of the Dissernet community a few months ago, when a political scientist headed the Moscow Public Supervisory Commission, designed to monitor the provision of human rights in places of forced content and assisting persons in places of forced content. Finding a human person who has defended the deputy chief of the Moscow pre -trial detention center, where Sergey Magnitsky died, was at least strange, at least, being at least strange. It is strange, if you don’t know in which country we live, where a political (and not only) life often looks like a cheap imitation. Although this statement is true for a much wider class of phenomena than just linden dissertations, today we will start a conversation with them.

There is no need to say that the topics of dissertations based on large -scale borrowings of other people's texts often have nothing to do with the further career of the authors of these scientific works. In the case of Anton Tsvetkov, this is not so. His dissertation study is devoted to the construction of legal culture in society. However, all the subsequent activities of this builder of legal culture in fact turned out to be the exact opposite meaning and content of his own scientific work. Judge for yourself. “In Russia, it is necessary, first of all, to contribute to the formation of a humane state that is closest to a person, his interests, needs and requests, acting not in separation from civil society, but in accordance with him,” the dissertation tells us. Referring to compliance with the principles and norms of international law, he comes to the conclusion, “that the main vector of changes is the transition from a loyal culture, when a person is perceived as a“ screw ”in a state machine, to a civil legal culture. In the future, in Russia, a legal culture should not only educate a law -abiding citizen, but also form a person who knows and can defend his rights and freedoms enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. ” Yeah! “The fundamental solution to this problem is to establish effective civil control over the authorities by expanding information transparency, openness and accessibility for citizens of state authorities.” Neither give nor take the true human rights activist. Somehow I can’t believe that a person who defended these capital truths just a few years ago before the academic council, and the real A.V. Tsvetkov, promoting criminal prosecution under Article 19.3 for “disobedience to the legal requirements of a police officer,” the same person. As a scientific political scientist, he should know that the criminalization of this article, while the state of illegal actions of the police, inevitably makes the same “screws” for the state machine for the state machine, about which the author was sad. Werewolf? How can one not recall: "Beware of the false prophets that come to you in sheep clothes, and inside the wolves are predatory." (Matt. 7:15)

One of the diagnoses repeatedly checked in practice, which puts the Dissernet community to its “clients” - willingness to any lie, depending on the circumstances. Moreover, a lie can take the most fantasy forms. For example, in the form of perjury against the world chess champion, supposedly biting the “warrant officer of the police, who blocked his path from the bus, into which he was put and from where he tried to break free.” Bright and tasteful. But on this the story with the ears does not end. Apparently, making sure that the “officers of Russia” do not pass their own, the warrant officers after such an unforgettable and anecdotal case, realizing their impunity, vied with vying to scribble sows on toothy rebels. Not further than a couple of days ago in a similar situation was the famous journalist Sergei Parkhomenko. In a police bus, where Sergei, without any visible reason, suddenly pushed law enforcement officers, according to their testimony , he began to fiercely gnaw at someone's police ears. To me, who knows Sergey as a true gourmet, a lover of delicious and healthy food, is poorly believed that he could be seduced by some kind of police ear. I hope, as in the case of Harry Kasparov, a simple examination will lead the next eared dreamer to clean water. But why is it all? If someone thinks that the fashion for biting her ears instilled in the ears of Tyson, then this is not so. This fashion has gone with a skillful submission of a human rights activist, and now a member of the Public Chamber under the President of Russia. This is what unexpected results leads to the frivolous connivance of the scientific community when defending dubious dissertations. Dissernet warns: linden dissertations are dangerous to health.


Illustration of the hedgehog