
This year, the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine was awarded to John O'Kif and the spouses of Moser, Edward and May- Britt. According to the wording of the Nobel Committee, the prize was received for " cell opening that form a navigation system in the brain." The neuro- and psychophysiologist Olga Awrik tells .

This story began in 1971, when John O'Kif (together with Jonathan Prostrovski) published a work on the analysis of the activity of individual neurons in Hippocampus at rats in free behavior (O'Keefe & Dostrovsky, 1971). John O'Kif was one of the first to use the possibility of registering the activity of individual neurons in freely mobile animals. That is, not in anesthetized, not mildly fixed, but for freely moving and choosing where to go and why. Registration was carried out both during “spontaneous” behavior (movements in space, nutrition and drinking, grooming, periods of sleep), and during “caused” behavior (when oriented to the object, sniffing, biting). Neurons were also tested upon presentation of auditory, visual, odor and tactile stimuli. Of the seventy -six registered cells, eight, as it turned out, had "preferred spatial orientation." It is important that these cells were not associated with a reaction to "simple" sensory stimuli, or with specific motor behavior.
From the very beginning of these studies, it was assumed that the discovered properties of the hippocampus neurons correspond to the idea of the “cognitive maps” of Edward Tolmen (Tolman, 1948), which showed that the rats who had the opportunity to examine the labyrinth are better trained in the subsequent skills in this labyrinth, which did not have such an opportunity. Since the rats did not receive any reinforcement during the initial examination, Tolmen suggested that such “cognitive maps” are formed as abstract representations, and not as a chain of reinforced motor reactions.
In addition to neurons that activate with a certain orientation of the animal, neurons were later described precisely “Places” (Place Cells) (O'KeFe, 1976), which are activated in a certain place, regardless of the specific orientation of the animal in space; Neurons of the “directions of the head” (Head Direction Cells (Taube et al., 1990); neurons of "Coordinate net" (Grid Cells) (Hafting et al., 2005); Neurons of "borders" (Border Cells) (Solstad et al., 2008). Not so long ago, neurons marking three -dimensional space in bats (YartSev & Ulanovsky, 2013) were described.

For the first time, the descriptions of neurons of the “coordinate grid” and neurons of “borders” were given precisely by the Mozgers and their employees. Each neuron of the “coordinate grid” is activated in several places of the examined space, so that the activation map looks like a hexagonal grill, where each grate knot is activation. And the neurons of “borders” are activated where the boundaries of the space provided for examination end.
The described neurons could be represented by components of the brain navigation system, a certain “internal” navigator informing us where we are. However, there are several points that complicate this picture. Judging by the fact that the sequence of activation of neurons in animals is repeated at the moments of stops (Foster & Wilson, 2006) and in the dream (LouIe & Wilson, 2001), as well as in people when recalling the episode of the movement in the virtual space (Miller et al., 2013), our memory can be reproduced in the form of assembly combinations of certain groups of neurons.
In recent studies by Howard Eichenbaum and his group (Macdonald et al., 2011; Eichenbaum, 2014) the so -called “time” cells of the hippocampus were described. It can be assumed that the neural groups of the hippocampus are the experience of the body, specially organized in space and time. And given that a certain sequence of activation of the hippocampus cells can occur even before the animal falls into this space (Dragoi & Tonegawa, 2011), this should be more likely not navigation, but brain predictions regarding future events based on the experience of the past (Buzzaki, 2013).
The awarded Nobel Prize is important in that it notes the achievements of science in the field of understanding what underlies “higher”, cognitive functions. This demonstrates the connection of the activity of neurons with subjective abstract “concepts”, such as “place”, and once again shows that we can have access to the “inner” world of the body. It is also significant that the emphasis of the study of the “higher” functions of the brain is shifted from the search for structures that carry out certain functions to the search for neural groups distributed by the brain, which are activated in accordance with a particular task solved by the body.
BUZS á Ki G. (2013) Cognitive Neuroscience: Time, Space and Memory. Nature, 497: 568-569.
Dragoi G, Tonegawa S. (2011) Preplay of Future Place Cell Sequences by Hippocapal Cellular Assemblies. Nature, 469: 397-401.
Eichenbaum H. (2014) Time Cells in the Hippocampus: A New Dimency for Mapping Memories. Nat Rev Neurosci. Oct 1. Doi: 10.1038/NRN3827.
Foster DJ, Wilson Ma. (2006) Reverse Replay of Behavioral Sequences in Hippo Place Cells During the Awake State. Nature, 440: 680-683.
HAFTING T, FYHN M, Molden S, Moser MB, Moser EI. (2005) Microstructure of a Spatial Map in the Entorhinal Cortex. Nature, 436: 801-806.
Loue K, Wilson Ma. (2001) Temporally Structured Replay of Awake Hippocampal Enstivity During Rapid Eye Movement Sleep. Neuron, 29: 145-156.
MacDonald CJ, Lepage KQ, Eden UT, Eichenbaum H. (2011) Hippocampal “ Time Cells ” Bridge the Gap in Memory For Discontigous Events. Neuron, 71: 737-749.
Miller JF, Neufang M, Solway a, Brandt a, Trippel M, Mader I, HEFFT S, MERKOW M, Polyn SM, Jacobs J, Kahana MJ, Schulze-Bonhage A. (2013) Neural Activity in Human HippoCapal Formation Reveals The Spatial Context of Retrieved Memories. Science, 342: 1111-1114.
O ' Keefe J. (1976) Place Units in the Hippocampus of the Frely Moving Rat. Exp Neurol, 51: 78-109.
O ' Keefe J, Dostrovsky J. (1971) The Hippocampus AS A SPATIAL MAP. Preliminary Evidence from Unit Activity in the Frely-Moving Rat. Brain Res, 34: 171-175.
Solstad T, Boccara Cn, Kropff E, Moser MB, Moser EI. (2008) Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex. Science, 322: 1865-1868.
Taube JS, Muller Ru, Ranck Jb Jr. (1990) Head-Direction Cells Recorded from the Postsubiculum in Frely Moving Rats. I. Description and Quantitate Analysis. J Neurosci, 10: 420-435.
Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive Maps in Man and Animals. Psychol. Rev., 55: 189-208.
YartSev MM1, Ulanovsky N. (2013) Representation of Three-Damensional Space in the Hippopocampus of Fying Bats. Science , 340: 367-372.