Lessons of Peter (part 1st)

First of all, of course, about feelings ... You know, dear readers, it turns out, it is such a happiness - to go surrounded by a huge number of people, in a single impulse of the chanting “Russia without Putin”, to feel a neighbor’s shoulder, to see burning eyes around and read in every look: “I'm not afraid of them anymore!” Honestly, I have not experienced such an emotional upsurge since the anti -Soviet rallies on Manezhnaya Square - to a broken voice, to tears in my eyes and to the fists clenched to the blue ... But we will return to the fists ... And this is a drunken sense of freedom, so intensifying with hard confidence that people around feel the same as you are ready to support you at a moment, a moment, a moment. Including sacrificing oneself.

So it was, for example, when the riot police were pulled from the steps of the historical Duma Sergey Gulyaev, on the eve of the very bright deputy of the local Legislative Assembly, and today - almost a national hero, one of the undoubted leaders of the opposition of a national scale. Dozens of people rushed to beat him off. It didn't work out. So far we still do not know how. But nothing-we will learn, soon everything will be completely different.

In a word, friends, the next time do not deny yourself the pleasure of participating in such a spiritual lifting event. Because, why still live, if not for the sake of such minutes when the nerves are tense to the limit, feelings overlap over the edge, and the heart is ready to burst from happiness? And you are not afraid of anything, that is, nothing at all. But there are no children. And it is worth talking about this separately.

A piss should be experienced to a person in the form. He is in performance, he is in the public service. But his form also obliges a lot. At least to not violate the law. Any law - human, divine. If before your eyes a hefty baby beats an old man or a woman with a rubber club, do you intervene? But does something change because it has a terrible black overalls with shoulder straps and a helmet with a plastic hack? In other words, should ordinary citizens feel moral doubts and suffer from the issue, intervene or not intervene when the unbelted bully in the form creates lawlessness? In my opinion, the answer to this question is obvious. I think “another Russia” should no longer allow the situation when the bandits exposed by the authorities beat civilians with impunity. It is necessary to create local units for maintaining public order, which during processions and rallies will be distributed along the entire length and width of the columns. They must suppress any violations of the law enforcement, from whose side they may happen. Including - neutralize provocateurs. Including - counteract the unmotivated manifestations of aggression of government representatives. It is important to note here that during the procession along Nevsky Prospekt, even when the police cordons broke through, not a single showcase was broken, not a single car was burned, and none of the residents of St. Petersburg was injured at the hands of the manifestants. That is, it was a really absolutely peaceful protest action of citizens who were attacked by the police and riot police. But peaceful does not mean toothless. Well, we got a bitter lesson. We learned him. In turn, the Russian police must understand that he will continue to receive a symmetrical answer to any of its actions.

This problem has another side. It is quite obvious to me that during the St. Petersburg "march of disagreed" representatives of the authorities, various criminal offenses were committed. Those photos and video materials that are available today by the organizers of the march allow us to say that dozens, if not hundreds of representatives of law enforcement agencies, can be subjected to criminal prosecution.

It is clear that the main fault for everything that happened falls on the shoulders of Governor Valentina Matvienko, with his irresponsible statements and actions, and, possibly, direct instructions (the investigation should understand this issue) provoking the Battle of the Main Avenue of St. Petersburg and on the adjacent streets. But there are other participants in the events. For example, the leaders of the city police and those units that arrived from other regions. And not only managers, but also ordinary employees. Personnel, flying around the whole world, on which the riot police strangles Sergey Gulyaev, can serve as the basis for initiating a criminal case of attempted murder. We already know the name of this riot police.

I would like to believe that the next “march of the disagreements”, which will take place in Moscow in mid -April, will be both cheerful, but even more organized. And will collect no less than people. It seems to me that Muscovites will be ashamed if they will give the honorary palm of the championship in the fight against the disgusting regime.

In the second part of the narrative, we will discuss the political aspects and the consequences of the St. Petersburg "march of disagreements."