So, the city hall, as expected, refused the organizers of the procession and rally on their initially proposed route. And she offered her alternative. The word behind the opposition. United word. For it is impossible to allow disagreements and a split at this stage.
In this regard, while the organizational committee thinks, I would like to advise him. Of course, I, as it were, as if (and already repeatedly explained why), but not an outsider. And my business is not a side. And I am on the side of those who go outside. Therefore, I allow myself to say. Moreover, it happens that from the side there is really better.
No need to put pressure on the Moscow authorities in order to crush. No need to make tough business converters from civil negotiations. No need to demand the resignation of Sobyanin now. Even Churov is quite miraculous. Is the very center the very center of Moscow? No, not an end in itself. The main thing is to hold a mass event in the planned time, without losing the pace and number of people. And the very end in itself - without clashes and without blood.
In addition, requiring the conduct only on Tverskaya or on the garden, be sure to closer to the Kremlin, you create a precedent and make yourself vulnerable, in terms of accusing of double standards. How do you yourself relate to the fact that after that the same radical nationalists will require their “Russian march” on Tverskaya to the “Manezhka”? You say: it is impossible, it means to disgraced the whole world and allow the unknown soldier to be the blasphemous raising his hands and the chanting of xenophobic slogans at the grave.
Anyway - are you “referred” by the garden ring? And wonderful. Now you can fully say that you can imagine not only those who live within the garden ring, but also as if the rest of Russia. Which, as you know, is immediately placed behind him.
Agree, in extreme cases, even on the procession from the Luzhniki and to the rally by the Crimean bridge, on the Frunze embankment. And hold the next rally on Sunday and offer the center again, since the counterargument - traffic jams - will not be so strong. Get the marsh - the better.
And enough words “absolutely” and “categorically”. Everything is relatively and not so imperative.
Now it is unprofitable for anyone to go on the forehead-some of the fundamental reasons, and the authorities-because she wants to legitimate to win in the March 4 elections, which can simply cancel or transfer under the pretext of combating riots. By the way, who will provoke them the first, he will ultimately lose.
Photo by hedgehog