The results of the week. On galleys with Freud

The week turned out to be noble. The public favorites have gone out (I propose to replace Putin’s “disguised” with this verb) in full. The leader of the nation hit NATO for attempts to eliminate Gaddafi, at the same time explaining the unreasonable Danes of the African state system: “Look at the map of this region of the world. There is a monarchy around. ... This generally meets the mentality of the population and the practice that has developed there. Mr. Gaddafi invented a new monarchy, just as Napoleon once after he came in the wake of the revolution to power and declared himself an emperor. The comparison may not be entirely correct, but in general the parallel is appropriate. Well, yes, this is the monarchy in essence. Crooked, oblique, any, abnormal, but such. ”

Meanwhile, the Locumstore held a meeting on modernization, visited the advanced rain, broadcasting through the Internet, and, relaxing, talked about what he would like to do when the real owner would return to the Kremlin: “There is no doubt about Skoliko, if by that time everything would work fine there, I would like to teach there. I would like to do this and not only in Skolkovo, but also in other places, because, it seems to me, for any politician who headed the state, just MUST, so that he would definitely talk about some kind of experience, and negative and positive, so that he does it in his country and in other places. This is interesting to a large number of people. ”

Finally, the Belarusian Old Man was terribly offended by the Chairman of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroza set a condition for his participation in the Chernobyl conference on this Alexander Grigoryevich. Lukashenko told who Barrosa himself was, and who went on his Ukrainian authorities: “Ask this question to Yanukovych, why the Belarusian president is not present at events. Unfortunately, the current leadership of Ukraine has enough licens ... As for the goats such as Barroso, and others ... Well, who is Barroso? There was some kind of Barroz in Portugal, but they kicked him out and arranged it in the European Commission. ”

With the apparent difference in the subjects of the statements (I am not talking about a different emotional glow), there is something uniting something of them. Namely, the shadow of old man Freud, who seems to be not only present on state galleys, but also steer them.

Each of the bosses, not wanting it himself, speaks about what puts pressure on his subconscious. Not about Gaddafi was discussed by Vladimir Vladimirovich. About yourself to your beloved. “A curve, obliquely, any kind, abnormal, but such” - the power vertical built by Putin’s near Putin’s built by Putin describes something like that. The famous intellectual and theorist of state construction Boris Gryzlov recently introduced a new term: “autocratic democracy or, if you translate it from the Russian language into a foreign language - sovereign democracy is the most historically common thing for Russia.” This, they say, they have all sorts of landtags there and the House of Commons self -identified in the confrontation of the monarch. Our national specificity lies in the touching unity of the Boyar Duma with an autocrat. Starting with Ivan the Terrible ...

The subtext is the same as in the premiere discussions about Gaddafi. Take us with black, let us rule our underdeveloped people as we can, according to the national tradition. It seems that the omnipotent national leader, observing the Big Blood in the Greater East, is relentlessly gnawing at the thought of the insidiousness of Western leaders and the unenviable fate of all these Gaddafi and Mubaraks. How so, more recently, they looked into the eyes, they looked for the soul, they sting their hand, opened the accounts. And now the deposits acquired by overwhelming gallery labor are frozen. And the ultimatum-either go in a good way, or leave you in a bad way. At the same time, they say that the bastards are hypocritical, which follow folk aspirations. As if not our good people themselves with all sorts of Goles and Facebooks will be hollowed. "Who took this right - to execute a person, whatever he is?" This is just some kind of cry of the soul. With such passion, certainly not about Gaddafi ...

Lukashenko, in fact, about the same. Here was Barrozu Prime Minister in Portugal. Well, just a goat: he occupied the highest post in the country, the army at hand, the police, and the fool away left his post. But at the same time, for some reason, no one tore his head. He occupied a warm place in the European Commission. And to me, the poor, if they trample from the galleys, a direct road behind bars. And this is at best.

Medvedev has the biggest chances to leave the hard place of service in the near future. Therefore, he quite practically tries to himself the fate of foreign presidents and prime ministers: lectures, teaching, scientific work. But a timid phrase gives out that all this creativity should be "interesting to a large number of people." So I see an announcement of the Medvedev lecture in Stanford: "How I dreamed of modernization." And then in Harvard: "How I praised freedom." And finally, in the London School of Economics: "Four years with an iPhone." I suspect, this will not be interesting not too many people. Especially if by that time Putin and Gryzlov realize his collective unconscious and establish this most “full autocratic democracy” in Russia. And it will not work adequately to translate this term to the “foreign”. Unless put in a row with the indistinguishable "Chuchha" and "Jamahiria." And only if Jamachiri survives.