In the range from despondency to gloating

Analysis of a non -free fall by observation method

A rally on Trubnaya Square 07/16/2019 In support of independent candidates in the Moscow City Duma, he was called "for the right to choose." It was attended by Gudkov, Yashin, Galyamin and other candidates who refused to register, as well as about 300 more people.

Independent candidates performed and spoke very well and convincingly. At least those who gathered on Trubnaya Square were completely agreed with them and periodically chanted: “Shame!” (at the address of the authorities, not the speakers), "So far we are one - we are invincible!" etc. Dmitry Gudkov had a very vivid performance, who in 10 minutes gave a detailed analysis of what happened in the country over 19 years of the Putin regime and explained that the reason for what happened was the reluctance of citizens to defend their rights, including on the street.

The correctness of Dmitry Gudkov was so obvious that the 300 people gathered on Trubnaya immediately agreed and began to chant, turning to 140 million Russians who were absent in an area: “Come! Come! ”...

Ahead of a few more protests related to the elections on 09/08/2019, but for now you can summarize intermediate results. After the attack of the do not care about the Moscow government in the municipal elections, when Muscovites allowed several dozen deputies to the local government, at least outwardly similar to people, and not to traditional juggles, the authorities woke up. And, having observed the election landscape, it decided that the metropolitan residents were completely unworthy of allowing them to choose a representative office at the city level. Having recorded that the pendulum in the municipal elections deviated towards Freedom more, the authorities decided to confuse this pendulum to the level of Turkmenistan to the elections on 09/08/2019.

According to preliminary data, 57 candidates, including Mitrokhin, Dmitry Gudkov and Gennady, Yashin, Sobol, Yankauskas, Rusakova, Babushkin, were refused to all the most famous independent candidates who had the chances of winning the election. About how hundreds of signatures of living and famous people, the “experts” of the election commission recognized as invalid, is written and said so much that it makes no sense to repeat.

The next crime, committed by an organized criminal group under the leadership of the head of the Mosgorisburkom Valentin Gorbunov, was distinguished by amazing and unprecedented cynicism and impudence.

Intelligent people in the face of such impudence is characterized by disclosure and indulge in despair. Here is one of the samples of such a mood from political scientist Alexei Malashenko : “Do you want to change something? Where - with us, in Russia? Yes, not a horseradish will work. The kings tried - from Alexei Mikhailovich to Alexander II, Kerensky Alexander Fedorovich, Kosygin Alexei Nikolaevich, tried, Gorbachev tried. Under Mikhal Sergeich, the last chance happened. For this chance, he is now hated - both the current government and its television and its own. And many miserable inhabitants ... As Pushkin said, we are a lazy people. We pay for this laziness and we will pay. What kind of Stalin, what kind of Putin. We are not able to change something in our state. Although what ours is, this is their state, where they are fattening, transfer money for the cordon and laugh at us. We endured and will endure what got from the medieval '' Eurasian yoke '', i.e. Love for the king and fear of changes. No matter how it is called - tsarism, Soviet power, or 'Eternal Putin' '(see the well -known but stupid text of Surkov). All this has already costed it and will cost very expensive. I haven’t been going to the demonstration for a long time. Useless. The world is changing. We are not. As a country we live. I don’t want to see its ending. ” The end of the quote.

Another common type of reaction to what is happening is gloating. A sample of corporate gloating from Arkady Babchenko : “Here the planet allocated a slave for slaves on its surface. Slave - live. Svobodny - leave. What a fool to fall. I'm free. I left. I live in a free country. And I feel great. Well? Russia will be a beggar - this is another matter. So that there was enough strength only to obtain food, and to climb a hobby, and they forgot to think. That's why I'm still ready to compete. And free ... on@uya? ”

One could support the struggle of the famous humanist Babchenko for further impoverishment of Russia, if not one unpleasant circumstance. In world and domestic history, there is no direct correlation between the poverty of the country and the peace of power. Let me remind you to Arkady Babchenko how, during the famine in Russia, her authorities called to the world fire and took energetic actions to incite it. For example, the text of the order of Mikhail Tukhachevsky of July 2, 1920: “Fighters of the working revolution. Turn your eyes to the west. In the West, the fate of the world revolution is decided. Through the corpse of white Poland lies the way to the world fire. On bayonets we will suffer happiness and the world to the working humanity. To the west! To decisive battles, to thundering victories! ”... Examples when the poverty of the people gets along well with the aggressiveness of the state, you can find in the present, it is enough to recall the DPRK ...

Among the other part of the thinking and writing in Russian the public, the amazement of the stupidity of power prevails, which, in their opinion, itself "grows the grave." Here is an example from Viktor Shenderovich: “The Kremlin is ruled by the inertia of its own political past, which has long been incompatible not only with law and morality, but also with common sense. It seems that it was easier: to allow several people who collected the required signatures? Well, there would be several opposition candidates in Moscow - it’s not in the Kremlin, and not even in the State Duma ... But what a return of protest in the legitimate field, what a sweeping, in front of the world, a step towards democracy! What PR cream could be collected on this! ” The end of the quote.

As for the incompatibility of the actions of the authorities with common sense, Viktor Anatolyevich is clearly mistaken, since in their situation these actions are more than reasonable and logical. The hit of any of the elections in the Moscow City Duma, not to mention the very real perspective, in the case of honest elections, elections to the MDD of several deputies defending the interests of Muscovites, would create a lot of troubles for the capital's organized crime group that has settled in the mayor's office. The use of the Tribune of the MGD for endless requests, the exposure of theft from the budget, political statements and other disgrace, which would undoubtedly be made by the Gudkov, Sobol, Yashin or Mitrokhin, would violate the current well -bearing and comfort, which Sobyanin and his accomplices managed to get used to.

So to blame power of illogicality is unfair, and it is pointless to scold it. This power must first be changed, and then judged. A little about the technique of this business. On points.

1. 1. Why did the participants of the action 07/14/2019 not blocked Tverskaya?

When we stood at the city hall and shouted “admit!”, “Sobyanin, come out!” And other correct words addressed to the silent building, in which on Sunday there was no authority, my colleague Ilona Sokolova dreamily said: “If Tverskaya is blocked, then after half an hour there will be Sobyanin.” Instead, Yashin’s proposal was implemented so that each of the participants in the action tapped the city hall door.

There were about two and a half thousand in the Novopushkinsky square. The city hall reached a thousand. A thousand people can block Tverskaya only if in this thousand at least half are ready to resist the police physically, which in the conditions of the capital's protest is absolutely unrealistic. Therefore, the organizers of the action did not have such an idea. The overlap of Tverskaya would take place spontaneously, without any initiative on the part of the organizers, if the city hall had more than a thousand protesters, but at least 20 thousand, that is, every fifth of the Muscovites whose signatures were stolen.

The difference between the protest, which overlaps the main street of Moscow, and the protest, which is scraped into the closed door of the city hall, is obvious. Therefore, the main question is the same: why the city hall had so few of us. A detailed answer to this question requires a separate conversation, therefore, a thesis.

1. 2. Why is the “smart voting machine” so “stupid”.

Alexey Navalny in an interview with Echo: “I really hope, of course, that hundreds of thousands will participate in the same“ smart vote ”in order to just avenge the United Russia, to do everything to be chosen as few as possible.” The end of the quote. That is, the main goal is to “take revenge on United Russia.” The end of the quote.

Navalny for 10 years now has the status of a Russian protest leader. What is the contribution to this status of his own political talents and achievements (they are undoubtedly) and what is the share of the efforts of the liberal party, in which consensus is practically reached, that “the protest is a bulk and those whom it supports,” it is difficult to say. When actually the sole leader of the protest puts forward a completely false target, the protest is doomed to failure. And “revenge of United Russia” is an absolutely false goal. Since United Russia is one of the many instruments of the Putin regime. Moreover, this tool is quite technical and easily replaceable.

Initially, this false target was set by Navalny in 2011 and then was formulated as a call to vote for any batch, except for a batch of crooks and thieves. The only result of that campaign of Navalny is the strengthening of the party of the demoniac clown Zh., the Orthodox Stalinists Zyuganov and the frenzied Plainites of the "Seryoga Paratrooper". Recently, the candidate of Zh., the “Institute of World Civilizations”, was transferred to a 14-story building with an area of ​​10,900 square meters. meters at the address: Leninsky Prospekt, ½, selected from the wounds. So the leader of United Russia Medvedev thanked the leader of the LDPR for the use of votes in the interests of the authorities. Alexey Navalny may be proud that in the capitalization of a commercial enterprise called “LDPR” there is his modest contribution.

What is a “smart vote”, the author himself explains best of all, Alexei Navalny: “September 8 - attention! “The following thing awaits you.” You go to the Smart Voting website and write your address. And the system gives you the surname for which you need to vote. It will be directly on September 8th. We hope that this will work through the messenger. It is clear that this site will be blocked, but, nevertheless, we will find a way when you say your address, give you a last name, for whom you need to vote in order to maximize the chances of rolling united Russia. ” The end of the quote.

That is, to make a decision, you do not need to think, study the candidate’s program, and look for his views with your own. For you, this will be done by a “smart vote”, created by Alexei Navalny. The attitude towards citizens as the wooden soldiers of Urfin Jus is a rather effective way to manage the masses, characteristic of authoritarian and totalitarian regimes. How useful is the change of one authoritarianism by another and where, by the guarantees that, having broken our heads the wall, we, as hedgehogs said, will not find ourselves in the next chamber - a question that it makes sense to ask ourselves now, and not when this scenario becomes a reality.

1. 3. What are the problems of the formation of the political elite similar to the problems of the male Fazan Argus

In his work, “eight sins of civilized humanity”, Ethologist Konrad Lorenz reveals one of the problems of our time on the example of the male Fazan of Bolshoi Argus. The fact is that in the struggle for the attention of females, these birds compete, growing themselves in the fly feathers of such an incredible length that makes them almost incapable of flight. And only the threat emanating from terrestrial predators does not allow the males of Argus to turn into non -lethal birds.

That is, the requirements of intraspecific competition are conflicting with the requirements of competition between species. The same can be seen in politics. And this is largely explained by the abundance of that absolutely illiquid political product, which is presented by the voter and the party of power, and, alas, in some cases the opposition.

The qualities that help increase the status within the batch or political party are significantly different from those that increase the competitiveness of the elections. In the first case, this is a demonstrative loyalty to the leader and the possession of the technique of intra -party intrigue, in the second - leadership qualities, an attractive program and the ability to submit it correctly. The development of the qualities of the qualities necessary for intra -party (intra -bubble) competition leads to the fact that in the elections in Russia there are increasingly “non -lethal pheasants” both from the authorities and the opposition. The fact that such a situation is not only in Russia and the same horses are suffered by the oldest parties in the USA and in Europe, for us a little comfort.

Nevertheless, parties to Russian protest are needed. And not later, but now. And all the conversations that now we will drop the regime, relying on authoritarian methods, blindly following a single leader, and only then we will build a “beautiful Russia of the future”, which, with some fright, will become better than Putin’s, are complete nonsense. And many Russian citizens understand that this is nonsense. And therefore, the protest is so powerless. Since this protest declares false goals, does not have a clear picture of the desired future of the country and the road map of movement to this future.

Since it is impossible to register any batch of protest in Putin's Russia, it should be a wide democratic movement with very wide value borders, outside which only Putinism, Nazism and Leninism-Stalinism should be. As for the historically slave predestination of Russia, perhaps political scientist Malashenko and humanist Babchenko will convince the experience of many countries and peoples, whose history of the centuries of the wildest slavery, and today these peoples have embarked on the path of freedom and democracy. And there are no imperial and slave genes in the body of Russians. Unless the excess of the territory and the presence of nuclear weapons are pressed on the brains through the Ostankino needle. It will be necessary to get rid of these three components of Russia, and then there will be no “imperial genes”.

Politics is a rather hard work. And it does not come down to the chanting of the right slogans. Supporters of democracy and liberalism often and rightly make fun of the stupidity of power. Only when it reaches the fight against her, for some reason they do not let their competitive advantages do. Such as intelligence and education. We can and must “change your mind” of power if we want to change something in the country.