The question is by the edge

Torpedoing the organization of the International Tribunal and the disgusting clowning with that speaking, or not talking Kovtun (in London affairs on the murder of Litvinenko) are two frank attempts by the Russian administration to prevent international justice. Here, even to come up with other versions, frankly, it doesn’t work ...

These attempts directly indicate the involvement of the Russian administration in both crimes - the latter is also clear now, and soon it will be proven officially.

What next? It is easy to foresee. The Kremlin’s refusal to recognize the obvious, further isolation, strengthening of sanctions, dangerous approximation of military confrontation ...

I well understand the logic of people involved in these crimes. I understand Putin and people from the leadership of the FSB and the Ministry of Defense, who gave the go -ahead to kill Litvinenko, directly responsible for the outbreak of war in Ukraine, for the supply of fatal weapons to the separatists who killed the Boeing passengers ... Criminals delay the time of retribution and try to leave it. Everyone would have done in their place; No questions about the chosen tactics.

But I do not understand the logic of the Russians who allowed themselves to make themselves mental hostages of the killers and, joyfully closing their eyes, marching with friendly columns to meet hell. Hell-at least socio-economic ...

And well, it would really be discussed only about the Orwell's “spans”, hugged by propaganda (they are just right to regret), but people who are fully owned by a computer “mouse” take part in the promotion of hell, which means that have easy access to real information.

And it seems that not idiots, so as not to see a step forward ...

What makes them do this?

The answer is banal: cowardice. And already as a result of cowardice - "Stockholm syndrome." Mental surrender to the bandit, riding a person from existential personal choice.

This syndrome reduces the chances of hostages to collective liberation - and, ultimately, is dangerous, not to mention the moral side of the issue. For it is good to die in peace with you, but it’s a shame to die in peace with a bandit ...

All totalitarian regimes are stuffed from the inside with this diagnosis. And the more dangerous the regime, the, as a rule, the expression of joy about the fact that your life is in the hands of the bandit is more shameless. In North Korea, millions of people are hysterically screaming at the sight of the third Kim in a row ...

They scream to drown out their fear.

We still do not screech, but fear is already sitting in the subcortex.

This is not about the corrupt Putin elite, who has long been “entered into a share” and is afraid to lose this share (everything is clear without immersion in the abyss of the psyche) - I am talking about “normal” people connecting their life and the life of their children with Russian culture and Russian landscape, and not with the cut of the bins of the homeland. I am talking about those who, as a result, the already close future will hit the most painful.

And I am forced to catch a word that characterizes the normality of this part of the Putin electorate: if it is a “norm”, then it is very far from not only from dignity, but also from self -preservation.

In my opinion, it is time for Russian inhabitants to estimate something to the nose (well, at least the transcript of future international resolutions)-and understand the difference between their own interest and the interests of the Kremlin administration.

The perpetrators in mass killings have no prospects outside of absolute power in Russia; No sanctions will be scared of them and no blood will stop: worse than they deserve, they will no longer be.

And to us?



Photo by hedgehog