
N. A. Aavrovskiy. Gymnasium of the Higher Sciences Prince. Bezborodko in Nyzhin 1820-1832.
Kiev 1879
This time, as it was, was not particularly benevolent for the "higher sciences." The reaction against the directing of the first half of the kingdom of Alexander, which dominated in the twenties, was very difficult to reflect on the fate of the school, especially the highest. The arrears and suspicion, predominant in the ruling spheres, were exploited by various dark personalities of the “protective” camp for a very low nature. Hence, a number of gonnii to science, a number of so -called “university history”, which, in the result, did not lower the general level of teaching, but also deprived of a school, not at all rich in the whole forces, many beneficial fighters. Nyzhinskaya "Gymnasium of the Higher Sciences" did not overtake the common fate. Already in the first periode of the existence, we are wearing with the so -called history "On free -thinking." This, by its own character, is completely homogeneous with the sizes of the St. Petersburg and Kharkov Universities, so that, according to the fair deputy of Lavrovskago, it can only be considered a departure of the general university history about the notorious voluntary of the professors, denounced Enlightenment of Magnitskago, Runich and others.
Until now, “Nyzhinskaya Istoria” was very few of the way, and only in the book of Lavrovskago all the circumstances of this history appear on the Svate. So as the facts reported by the city of Lavrovsky. Until now, they are still interested in the most important historical, then we will allow us to introduce readers to them, how much the possibility of the premises of the bibliographic deputy are given.
The essence of the "history" is very simple. Professors of the Nyzhin gymnasium were undressed into many groups, which were far from friendly to a friend. One of these groups, which was distinguished by “protective” tendencies, finally launched a denunciation and accusation of “free -thinking” and harmful explorers on students. Discharge began, which did not get out of the stream of establishment; The highest power was being embedded, and it ended the dismissal and expelled four professors who were suspected in “free -thoughts”. The main thing in all this history by the accusations is the Austrian native of Bilevich, the professor of political science, and from the accused - Bralusov, the professor of the natural law and the inspector of the gymnasium Pansіon. Upon -in -law of “free -thinking” extended to three more teachers: Zinger (Nemetsk literature), Landrazhin (French literature) and Shapalinskago (mathematics). G. Lavrovskiy is generally quite stingy with the characteristics of the individuals who speak to his cries, but, apparently, the “free -thoughts” did not belong far from the extreme even for that time. So, for example, Bralusov, most incorporated from all of them, considered it even reprehensible for the students to be Pushkin: when determined by the inspector, complaining of conference on the disclosure of the Panceners, he indicated, among other things, that the students were reading books that were indecent for their age. Hold the composition of Alexander Pushkin and other similar ones. ” As it were, in May 1827, Bilevich filed in a conference, in which he explained that he "took the foundations of the foundation of freedom, which took place in the foundation of the right of natural The trustee is not read according to the de-Martini systems, but by the foundation of the philosophy of Kant and Shada ”(p. 95). Bralusov rejected that the accusation is false and exposed only Bilevich’s unwillingness, but the proof that his course does not back down from the leadership, presented the discipline of the notes compiled with his words. Bilevich, on his part, also presented two copies of the notes, explaining that the notes filed by Bralousov, not genuine, but fixed by him after. And the other notes were transmitted at the conference by the law teacher of the gymnasium of Volynsky for the discharge, whether they were not in them a disgusting Orthodox.
From. The proto -reinforcing was found in the notes of the poison. According to his many, many instructions, taught by Bilevich “in the classical science of natural law”, are “the purpose of the young man’s inconsistent and with the most pious”, moreover, adds from. Volynskiy - “that in the one, awarded to the I was revised between the rules, there was no teaching about the positions of God, to the parents, to the mentor, to the authorities and in general, even to the very Seba”. G. Lavrovskiy Details to introduce us to the essence of the deed of Volynskago: for the most part, this is a simple nit-picking and biased interpretation of a very innocent nature.
A long polemic arose: Ballusov and Bilevich filed in turn reports to the conference. About six months, during the fixing duties of Shapalinsky, holding the side of Bralousov, it did not get out of conference, but with the arrival of the new director of the Yasnovskoye, it received more serious turnover. According to the prescription of the trustee, the students were selected by the notebooks of the natural law and the conference was put into the conference by the all the students of Bralousov, he would find out how much the notebooks were written with his words and what was added by the audience themselves. Showing the students were generally pleased to be good for Bralousov. In a number of others, the shows of Gogol and Kukolnik, who were at that time in the senior classes of gymnasiums, have been preserved. Gogol shows very short and only confirms the Odin item in the shows of Kukolnik; The puppeteer played a prominent role in all the history. Obviously, wanting to fragrance Bralousov, he showed that his chosen notebooks are the essence of mother for dissertation by natural law and only partially compiled by him according to lectures, mainly on the basis of various books they read, between which he called Russo, Volter, Volter, Volter, Volter, Volter. Montesquieu, Comte, etc. Interrogation of the students was interrupted for a while and was adopted by the highest authorities. But the history was played more. The new director of Yasnovskiy clearly became to the side of the enemies of Bralousov. The edge of the accusations of “free -thinking”, against Bralousov, was put forward even more and more - in the licentiousness of the Panesion, which he was the main leader. The accusation of this found strong support from the new director. At the conference, the question was excited about the Morah K “Pancion City Crouping”. Bilevich and the director were proposed at the same time. Whether the Upcromeland and as it were unknown, but, as it were, the students, in the features of the exams, were not enough to retreat from the original, well -frying for Bralouses showed. The puppeteer and the puppeteer refused to do, the departure of his brother of his Plato, the former teacher of the Latin language in the Nyzhin gymnasium [1] . Such a remorse, however, did not help, and the puppeteer paid dearly for his hobby. Despite the brilliantly restrained exam and the presentation of conference, the Minister of People's Enlightenment deprived the puppeteer who had a puppet for him at the end of the rank of rank; He was simply given a witness that he studied such a science.
"Domestic Notes", 1879, No. 9 September, Dep. II, p. 191-194
[1] It is curious that this Plato Puppeteer, who has now directed his brother on the path of truth, himself was accused of free -thought. In the book of Lavrovskago, we find, by the way (p. 15), an extract from the report of the trustee, with a complaint against the puppeteer, that he, “entering the gym of the pupils in the morning, in the morning of the time, when they, according to the established procedure, after the established order Half of the 8th hour from the new leader, they were preparing to go to the liturge, taking the Book of the Communist Party, began to recite with all acting gestures, daring even to the political explanation for texts, which is completely prohibited and in simple meaning teachers. "