 In the Kremlin Flock Russian political scientists continue to demonstrate a tendency to romantic plots. So the general director of the Institute of National Strategy, Stanislav Belkovsky, in his recent article “Boys, or Logic of Vladimir Putin,” claims that life on the upper regiments of the Russian political storyteller is built according to the laws of the criminal world sung by courtyard poets. In other words, “according to concepts”. Belkovsky directly says: “Putin is an uncle of very strict rules. More precisely, concepts. The President of the Russian Federation has an unambiguous moral code that would be correctly called “kids” (he almost copies informal trials of post -Soviet Robingid groups). ”
 Well, I don’t know ... To begin with, I don’t remember something that, for example, the Solntsevsky shared good, selected from the same workshops, with residents of nearby villages. I live quite a few acquaintances in Peredelkino, and no one has ever told that bandits came to the site with proposals for material assistance. Another thing is that, perhaps, at the dawn of early -capitalist banditry, the motive of the noble revenge was really present in the actions of the so -called guys from the outskirts that were on the sidelines of a new life. However, he was quite quickly supplanted by their crocodile inclinations and an unbridled thirst for power and profit. And the term “boys” today is only etymologically close to the original courtyard. So, and only so, the bandits call each other. (Try to call some unicellular “bull” in a conversation, for example, a “man.” In response, you will immediately hear the evil: “The men are in the field.”) And they have not lived according to the law “do not beat below the waist”. However, the devil with them, with the bandits.
But this is what the capital's political scientist saw Robingidovsky in the actions of Vladimir Putin and his closest environment, I am completely not clear to me. Perhaps the placement of shares by Rosneft Mr. Belkovsky interprets as the distribution of the looted by the poor, but then I have to disappoint him-both the goals and objectives of this event are completely different. Or maybe the story of the theft of Yukos is drawn to the charity? But then where are those humiliated and insulted, who got at least the snaps from this company?
Well, okay - we will not find fault with the words. Although personally, when describing this social phenomenon, we will call it “Putin and Ko.” - I would use a slightly different metaphorical series. They, of course, are not noble bandits. In my opinion, at the dawn of their unexpected power, these guys were most like a hungry wolf pack, scouring in the surrounding fields in search of edible. Then the short stage of digestion came. The current one can be characterized as a stage of secondary saturation, when the deed is already inside the pack. He promises to be the most ruthless. So, from my point of view, the dismissal of the Prosecutor General Ustinov is, first of all, the care of the leader of the pack, in which, if in time, completely bloody showdowns will begin in time.
As for the third term, I want to remind the respected Stanislav Aleksandrovich, who is so recklessly confident in the ambulance of the ruler in the Kremlin that there are no deadlines. The deadlines are not measured by the Constitution, but by life. With the plowmen, by the way, the same story. Alexander Ryklin All rights to materials located on the EJ.ru website are protected in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, including copyright and related rights. With any use of the site and satellite projects, hyperlink (Hyperlink) on EJ.ru is required. |