Translated material
Bucha
Just a few hours, it took Russian propaganda to blame the Ukrainian side of falsification of video and photo. No matter how hard it was not to disassemble events in Buch, I will try to answer the most common stuffing
Why did so much time have passed between the release of the Russian troops and the publication of photographs of the victims?
One of the arguments of Russian propaganda is that a lot of time has passed between these two events and during this time they "decomposed all." Let's look at the dates ...
The first unconfirmed data on the exit from the city of the military appeared on March 31, while it was noted about the ceasefire and silence , and not that ZSU entered there. Everyone understands that with the onset of silence, no one will immediately force the city and no one will let reports on mined streets either
Moreover, the next day the secretary of the city Rada Buchi posted a video where he warned that the city was still occupied. There are no Russian military, but enemy DRGs are possible, so it’s too early to return
Only a day after this message (April 2), journalists were able to work in the city and it is on these dates that the first photos of reprisals appear. And on the morning of April 3, the news diverges through the world media
As you can see, there is no artificial delay and pauses for several days. All events are going on day after day (31.03 - unconfirmed data on the abandoned city, 1.04 - the entry of the first groups of the ZSU and the cleansing of the city, 2.04 - the first reporters. 3.04 - World media)
UPD. The comments showed a video with corpses and tied hands on April 1. What even more refutes the version that "there was no news for a long time and all set up"
White bandages are the corpses of Russian soldiers?
Many killed on their sleeves had white bandages. The Kremlin media began to write that these are the corpses of Russian military or collaborators who were killed by ZSU.
The truth is that the white bandages on the sleeves of civilians first became known from the news about Mariupol . It was there that the entered troops of Russia forced the population to wear them.
According to the Ukrainian side, this was done so that the city’s defenders were harder to distinguish civilians from the enemy. With a high degree of probability, it was the same approach that was used in the Kyiv region.
Raised hands, rising corpse
Enough old technique to sow the grain of doubts - this is a search for inconsistencies on the video. Even now in the world of technology there are millions of people who do not believe the landing of Americans on the moon, and the video recording with the installation of the flag is disassembled by personnel:
In the photographs and videos, demonstrating how the Apollo-11 crew sets the US flag on the moon, the “ripples” on the surface of the canvas are noticeable. Supporters of the “lunar conspiracy” believe that this ripples arose due to the gust of wind, absent in the airless space on the surface of the moon
Wikipedia
This also includes thousands of videos with a snowy man, a UFO, a Lokhn monster, "travelers in time" in old photographs, ghosts in VHS cassettes, etc.
It is quite easy for such people to discard the fact of dozens of lying corpses, because "look, at 30 seconds in a video with a quality of 240p in the rear -view of the rear -view of a shaking machine you can see how ....". And here it is foolish to talk about compression artifacts, dirty windshield or any other logical arguments.
UPD. And a video with his hands raised and in better quality already dismantled the mediazone
So psychology is arranged that a person will take into account only those facts that arrange him. And even if hundreds of specialists from Human Rights Watch, the Red Cross and other non -governmental organizations, having analyzed the video, confirm its truthfulness and the presence of hundreds of corpses, then a new argument will have a new argument
This is all a conspiracy
There is a so -called principle of razor Occam , which in a simple sense sounds like
If there are several logically consistent explanations of any phenomenon that explain it equally well, then it should, ceteris paribus, prefer the simplest of them.
In other words, the simplest explanation is often and is correct. If on one side of the scales there is an option:
- The Russian army killed the population during the occupation to protect itself from possible sabotage
And on the other ...
- Ukraine wanted to substitute Russia, posting even more sanctions, while the “special operation” bribed foreign journalists, blocked the city for several days after the enemy’s retreat, hired the actors, made them up with blood, part of the corpses were taken from other villages, forced the local population, and some texts were distributed for interviews on the camera
It is logical to make a choice in the direction of the first option. In addition, in alternative history, there should have simply existed thousands of participants, starting from Zelensky and Minister of Foreign Affairs, and ending with hundreds of actors, military, journalists, the leadership of Reuters and Assosiated Press, who, negotiating with the Ukrainian government, sent their employees to remove everything ... It is simply impossible so that someone would not fly out of this chain and not betrayed “all of it” Truth ", which would be immediately smashed by the Prochrevsky media.
Instead of one logical version of the refutation, we begin to see a dozen stuffing:
- Railed hand, all alive there
- These are the corpses of the Russian military, there are dressings on them
- These are fresh corpses of the locals who were killed yesterday ZSU
The approach almost completely copies the story with Boeing, satellite pictures of the Ukrainian fighter, Ukrainian beech, etc. And the goal here is not to force to believe in an alternative version (with so much evidence this is not possible), but to sow doubt in the main one. "If everyone is lying, then perhaps these are also hiding something too?"
No, they do not hide. The killers have names, command. Actions are performed by specific people and here pluralism "not everything is so unambiguous" cannot be.
* * *I understand that the bulk of the audience has no gray areas and uncertainty regarding the atrocities of the Russian army. Nobody needs to prove anything. But it so happened that this is almost the only place in Runet where you can write, without the administration has not removed everything within 30 minutes.