In the opposition

Crossroads

July 9, 2010 Natella Boltyanskaya

On Khodorkovsky readings from the mouth of a sociologist Alexei Levinson, a sad but sober thought sounded: we proceed from the fact that there was no way out. And it is proposed to live in these conditions. How to live? Claring the smaller of the evils, which, according to some quite simple conclusions, is the current president. Look.

The recent rigid acceleration of the demonstration in Moscow took place before the eyes of the whole of two Commissioners for Human Rights - Moscow and All -Russian. I can’t help but assume that their appearance on the triumphal was not just not accidental, but they specifically received a “tip”. From whom? Yes, not from the one who gives the command to accelerate. The aiming was designed that in front of the two authorized comrades, law enforcement officers would behave decently. They did not. And moreover, Lukin, who sharply reacted to what was happening, was criticized from all official parties. Criticism turning into grass. According to his activity, only the lazy did not go, even the video on the Internet was launched about how he was not not parking his car on the sidewalk. Those of you who have a car with a driver someday are soaring the question of exactly where your driver is parking? And Lukin was caught here and here. And this despite the fact that neither Lukin nor the musician tried to cover with their bodies those who were dragged along the asphalt to the buses, contrary to the very 31st article of the constitution. It was enough that the authorized ones were present. And were recorded by media correspondents.

But now I’m not talking about authorized, not about those whose rights have violated, and not about those who violated these rights. I'm talking about those who gave orders. I hope that you did not have a question, what kind of eagle head what orders gave? For in the tandem, President-Prime Minister Liberal is rather the president. I do not want to go into his motivation. Perhaps he really just likes to be the first person. Very relatively first. For very many of his initiatives come across resistance. As it was, for example, with the Magnitsky case. Medvedev on November 24, 2009 instructed to conduct a check of the quality of medical care provided in the institutions of the Federal Penitentiary Service. In addition, the president instructed to analyze the practice of applying a measure of detention in relation to persons who first committed economic crimes, as well as submit proposals for improving legislation in this area. By and large, it would be necessary to give a personal assignment to the Minister Nurgaliev ... But who knows, and suddenly Medvedev generally demanded the resignation of Nurgaliev. But Nurgaliev yourself know whose. And for once, the prime minister granted the president for once, they sat for several hours, and Nurgaliev remained at his post, and the punishment for the death of Magnitsky was limited to the severely shifted eyebrows of the president.

No, of course, these are all my fantasies ... But does a video that walks in the public domain requires an answer? For me, so he demands from the Minister of Internal Affairs a shot of honor on his own forehead. Or an evidence -based explanation that this is all a lie from the first to the last word. But this is not a royal thing - to give all citizens to give explanations. And as for the shot - to hell with you guys. Do not wait, as old man Rabinovich answered the question of well -being. So, what we have been observed recently: the prime minister in Davos, and the president - immediately give an interview to the opposition press; then the law on house arrest, the first on which Lebedev with Khodorkovsky should go home, but they are still taken from "sailor silence" to Hamsud; That cautious comrade Jurgens suddenly take and blurt out something very pro-presidential, but anti-Prime Minister ... No, I do not exclude that all these are their own games, as you know, the dear are scolding-they are only amused, and in reality there is no internal conflict, but there is only a staging for others. And every day they throw a coin: today, says one, I am liberals for w ... I’ll bite (not with my teeth, there is someone to lie), and tomorrow you will stand in the pose of the offended. And then I will voice some kind of populist garbage, and you will disavow it from an economic point of view. And strictly instruct the departments to figure it out. We will always agree with you? .. What if not always?

I understand naivety and, possibly, the predictability of my own position. Perhaps they expect this from me. But look, in a situation where the Internet has remained the only relatively invulnerable space for the disagreement, maybe go to rapprochement with the vegetarian wing of the Powder Party? I am writing, and most disgusting. Since everything is as dreamed, and the heads of our eagle are indeed not in the wretches, then the real power is more at the worst head, and there is very little chance of giving the other head such support that she stomped and asked: Tsar Il is not the king? And if everything is as afraid, and there is a bad vaudeville with a complete understanding of the sides, it turns out that I generously pour water on their mill. And it remains only to vicious everything on the same, not yet combed Internet space and plan the entry into the society of amateur volcanologists. And I have already chosen a volcano - this one . And I will willingly accept the accusations that such methods are allowed to operate on some butterfly from the “Nashists”. Methods, you know, tested. Especially in conditions when there is no way out and you need to live in the proposed situation.

Photos of RIA Novosti