Translated material
Feomonas words
In society
Feomonas words
February 16, 2010 Julia Latynina
A couple of days ago I sat in a restaurant with my friend, who began with Chubais and Gaidar, but, by the way, now in good ranks.
“How could Illarionov write about Gaidar?” - my friend was indignant.
“But this is true,” she answered, “to say that Gaidar saved the country from hunger is not very correct.”
- This may be true, but talking so shamelessly.
We, out of habit, believe that the phrases that we pronounce must report some information. However, not all phrases report the information. Some phrases are phrases-famers, phrases-mundi: they simply signal the belonging of the pronunciation of the pronunciation to one or another social group.
A huge number of such phrases are pronounced by the ruling elite. Here is a typical example: "The West does not love us." Question: "And where is the evidence?" He will stumble upon the answer: "Well, this is obvious!"
And if you ask a question for a second time, then a person convinced that the West does not love us, will look at you suspiciously and depart: the stump is clear, if he demands evidence, then he was bought by the West.
Or one more thing: "Putin saved Russia, which rolled into the abyss." How Putin saved Russia, which rolled into the abyss if, under Putin, the country was rolled out of the "big eight", and the cops began to shoot at people right on the streets - it is not reported. This is not a phrase-information, this is a phrasomon phrase. Pronounce - means your own.
Or here: "The USA imposes a new world order to everyone." This phrase is loved to pronounce not only in Russia. It is equally loved to pronounce European parliamentarians, Latin American dictators, African cannibals and Islamic terrorists. Already, in fact, one number of regimes and politicians pronouncing this phrase shows that it is a complete nonsense: a new world order is good, against which such a wide coalition protests - from Ben Laden to Eurobenocracy. But this is again the phrase-Feromon. She does not make any sense but information: “I am mine! I don't like America either! "
As I said, phrase-famers in Russia most often sound on official TV. "Putin built a vertical of power." "Putin saved the country that fell into the abyss." "The United States imposes a new world order to everyone."
But it is no less important that phrase-famers are very often found in liberal public opinion. The phrase “Gaidar saved the country from hunger and civil war” is one of them. When approaching, it does not decay into facts, but into meaningless sounds. There were 15 republics in the USSR, in no one, with the exception of the Baltic, there were no normal reforms, no hunger happened in any and civil wars occurred in all. In addition, as Andrei Illarionov rightly noted, in Russia there was just a civil war: after all, Chechnya is part of Russia. Gaidar protested against this war - but he did not save from her. The phrase “Gaidar saved the country from hunger and civil war” is built on the same principle that the phrase “Putin saved the country that rolled into the abyss”. This is the phrase-Feromon. It does not mean anything but the next: "I respect Gaidar."
Liberal public opinion also has other phrase-famers. For example: "Putin blew up at home in Moscow." Large -scale terrorist attacks that are arranged throughout Russia last over 10 years - from the explosion in the market in Vladikavkaz on March 19, 1999 (long before Putin's appointment to the prime minister) to the explosion of the Nevsky Express this year.
The easiest question is: how did Putin blow everyone? And in Samara, and in Essentuki, and in Nevinnomyssk, and in Astrakhan, and in Vladikavkaz, and in Avtozavodskaya, and in Riga? The phrase “Putin blown up at home” is a phrase-Feromon, which means: “I do not like Putin.” And an attempt to find out what is behind this phrase, leads to instant hysteria and statements like: “Once he (she) doubts that Putin exploded at home, it means that he (she) is an agent of the bloody regime!”
The carrier of this phrase argues something like this: "Once Putin is a bastard, we must say that he exploded at home, so I will manifest the independence of judgments and once again spit into a bloody regime." The carrier of this phrase usually does not suspect the independence of judgments, and not in pronouncing the phrase phrases.
And here is another one: “The cops in the Caucasus are killed, because the cops got peaceful Wahhabis, who simply pray differently.” This is the phrase that the human rights activists and the Wahhabis pronounce the same pathos, and which simply does not correspond to the facts. No matter how many times I tried to understand the biography of the “offended” Wahhabit, Rasul Makasharipov or Vadim Butdaev, so many times everything turned out to be exactly the opposite: at first a person becomes a whirlwind, says that there is a defensive jihad in the Caucasus, says: “Kill the cops - you’ll go to heaven”, “Kill the Russian - you will go to heaven,” and then they begin to get it.
Or: "The cause of terrorist attacks in Russia is the massacre arranged by our troops in Chechnya." About 2 thousand people died in the attacks in Russia, in Chechnya the Russian army destroyed at least 250 thousand people, but, paradoxically, the atrocities of our troops in Chechnya and the terrorist attacks arranged by the Wahhabis are not directly connected.
The houses in Moscow were blown up by two Karachais (Gostiyev and his son -in -law Abaev) and Bashkir with Tatar - Saytakov and Akhmyarov. Neither in Karachay-Cherkessia, nor in Bashkiria, nor in Tatarstan, Russian troops did not suit the massacre. The house in Buinaksk was blown up by the Avars from the Wahhabi village of New Kudali: Russian troops did not cut Avartsev. One of the leaders of the “Imrat Caucasus” is now Sheikh Said Buryatsky-he is Alexander Tikhomirov, who came to the Caucasus to fight against the infidels from his native Buryatia: there were no cleanings in Ulan-Uda.
We cleaned the Samashki and the New Aldes, and the natives of Jordan and the city of Karachayevsk exploded Russia. The most remarkable thing is that the phrase-Feromon: “Putin exploded at home” and phrase-Feromon: “The Wahhabitov terror is a response to the atrocities of the Russian troops” contradict each other. But the carriers of these phrases do not notice this.
But the phrase “the atrocities of the cops in Chechnya led to the atrocities of cops throughout Russia” - completely fair. The cops tried human, cleaning the new Aldes. Then they began to eat people throughout Russia.
However, there is a big difference between phrases-famers that the authorities pronounces, and phrases-Feromons, which guide liberal public opinion. This difference, in my opinion, lies in the fact that the Putin government building itself is so rotten, it itself is built on such a marshy foundation of such unfit and plundered materials that Putin’s defenders have no remaining but a lie. “Putin built a vertical of power!”, “Putin saved the country from disaster!”, “They do not love us!” - All this sounds ridiculous and sorry in the country, captured by offshores, with cops that kill people right on the streets. If you cross out the accusations against Putin’s regime, the point on the explosion of the houses, then taking into account Beslan, where the order was given to destroy the hostages along with the terrorists, and taking into account the Nord-Ost, where, according to Putin, no one died from gas-this list will not really shorten.
The regime needs lies, because besides lies, it has no other resource. I don’t understand why liberal public opinion needs a lie. Why say that “Gaidar saved the country from hunger” - he has enough other merits. Why take the side of Islamic terrorists and repeat with them fairy tales about bad cops that pursue everyone who prays. Why swallow Berezovsky's bait and say that "Putin blew up at home."
There are no lies in salvation. Any lies - only in destruction. Words should not play the role of pheromones.