Alexander Zaitsev. Ufland writes prose

This thesis, with which these days, somehow I don’t really want to argue. "Make your legend yourself, because nobody, by the way you, needs it." But after all, there is, with an interpretation, Vladimir Ufland. Against the backdrop of tirelessly inventive Self -Made Men and Women, persistently convincing us that they are like the same “religious personalities”, fenoma is a phenomenon. Because I have never been engaged in what we call a self -scenes. And yet it became legendary. And all the legends of him were used by such outstanding people as Joseph Brodsky, Sepaee Dovlatov, Konstantin Kuzminsky, Lev Losev ... Here are a few haping quotes on this score.

"I love the ufland very much. And no matter how much the lifting is about him, everything seems to me enough. Because the ufland is unique ... Ufland, in my opinion, is the only person who responds positively about," wrote K. Kuzminsky, the poet and frantic Kpik, the unique "latest Pusian poetry has blue. Lagons ". "Uflanda is famous for its phenomenal aspenses, cast -iron coils, family DPAMs, a sense of swords and the deposits of memories," Brodsky wrote. Lev Losev (Lifshits): "He is the most famous of these sensitive poets. He is always remembered by Brodsky ... Ufland is a person who knows everything. He woven tapestry." Dovlatov owes: "... it is an elegant costume for his own work on the jacket ... He worked in the geogfichek museum with an exhibit ... I learned to play on the harpsichord ... I will exhibit on an epitage ...".

With this way, the legend of Ufland appeared. But, of course, she would have been one of the legends about intense and unusual people, which there are always enough poets, if not for something more significant: Ufland is one of the best poets of modernity. By itself, without legends.

And so he released a score book. But it does not consist of poems. These, for the most part, can be called an essay for unnecessary clarity, for unnecessary clarity.

The Books of Ufland are very playful, and all of them are small. Sunny, this is the very feeling of the swords that Brodsky pointed out. And in this case, the “deposits of the reconsids” have become a compact election of lungs, laconic articles mainly about the author and acquaintances of the author - Petitical poets and, wider, “figures of unofficial art”: from the already mentioned BPD, Dovlatov and Losev to Sepgey Kulla, Alexander Kondatov, Mikhail Epemin, Mikhail Epemin, Mikhail Epemin Vladlena Gavpilchik and many DIG. All this is used to the pen of the book - "Textollites (texts about the people of the literary attitude)." The second part is called "textollas (texts about people, the tsars and the on -and -and -youth of truth)", and here it is no longer necessary to be surprised, making the names of not only Shemyakin or Kpasovitsky, but also Mannepheim, Fpanko, Wallenbear or Sakhaov. Because if the overflow is a scope of “what I saw myself, I heard from the people to whom I have a trust” , as the autop on the beginning of the book, then the second is like that, “what I thought about, looking back at my life and my sophisticated” .

It seems that literary memories are always something thorough and monumental. Memoirs. But Ufland lives far from the literature. The lively, which he always “had a” poetry, is not a narrow literary appropriate, as often happens, but an inseparable part of his poetics. And this living speech is in his notes. After all, when in the case with the Drinks, you remember the fucker - these are also memories.

Even the most lightweight poets often become unbearably heavy and unreasonable in their literary and near -faced articles. But the Ufland is also a subcontract integrity. Maybe even he is alone and quenches this integrity in our vysema. With the one, these texts are far from that surprising um of uniqueness and persuasiveness, which is characteristic of his poems. You read articles as if you know that the author is an extraordinary poet and a person.

But the Ufland is not executed. This is also a very important feature. "If God sends this book of readers, Autop hopes that the reader will understand: the writer does not know how to write a good, seetime, science -free." This is not a pose, apparently, what is known about Vladimir Uflande. This is a scope style, shaken in unobtrust.

His notes remind us, who have traveled in a certain seariness, which to say with your language is not only a person, but also his duty. The book has no way for universality, the total coverage, in it, the one, there is a subsidized - but without “pedaling” - an individual, personal attitude.

And there is also humor in it. Because the Ufland, as it were, consists of humor and IPONION, even if these words are covered strongly. It seems to me that he always lies to people who will be able to smile. This quality greatly facilitates the understanding of the book, and not only Uflandovskaya, by the way. And in general - not only books. And the humor of these texts - it could be spit as soft, rethily, even - it - in the sense - unenvalued. These words have a haraptage generally the whole book of Ufland, because humor is based on it.

To make the kpitiki just, the autopher decided to sprinkle the most important things for understanding of their priorities. Here, the topim. "But still being as a ridiculous sockess as sad. Even a little more often - funny."