Surkovsky syndrome

None of the personnel changes in the last days of 10 caused deep experiences. In addition to V. Surkov. In general, it is even incomprehensible, the entire personnel scheme in the AP, government, Duma, and even in EP, is strongly blocked. Well, yes, protest activity, not to that. Moreover, there is a curly thought about them, which explains everything - this is already the government and AP is changing the personnel so that the prime minister is already the president, even if the president is not too prime minister.

Still, permutations: Surkov-volodin. Vaino to the leaders of the government apparatus, Naryshkin in the Duma speaker, and Gryzlova ... S. Ivanov instead of Naryshkin, Rogozin - to the defense industry, to monitor the fall of satellites and missiles. Pollyeva will control the apparatus of the Duma, and A. Zhukov in the Duma from the deputy prime ministers (like, vice-speaker). Many. But only Surkov hooked the feelings of observers. Moreover, somehow otherwise, not from the personnel question, but personally.

Surkov AS IS somehow grew up with the thoughts of citizens about him, and not only about him-that there is a rare luck of a creative character. And this is not because it was long. Actually, there is immediately a nuance: what does it mean? It seems that it does not go nowhere, the position is not bad, and the meadow is tasty. Apparently, the whole thing is in art-twelve-year dramatic unity of the place, time and action (a given person at that time in a certain place) and caused the feeling of the end of something. Although, based on the same dramaturgy, this is just one performance ended, but the theater works and all remained in the troupe. Is the ending performance made strong correlation with the role? (The artists do this - "a curse of one role", all that). Of course, then you can’t help but worry.

In fact, judging by the number of complaints among journalists (laconic, indirect and ambiguous, however, up to the “end of the beautiful era”), they perceive this departure as loss. Perhaps Surkov was a kind of guarantor of the Baida, which was called "internal politics" with the addition of something that vaguely resembled the words "enlightened absolutism." If so, then here, in fact, leaving for Nirvana occurred, which completely contradicts the role of personality in history-there are still full of stories, and the personality, it turns out, was exclusively for a given place. Here, even on the topic of the power that wishes evil, ah, always makes good - people were imbued with feelings.

Of course, here it may not be Stockholm syndrome in its purest form, but also a foreboding that the arrived security forces, etc. The humanitarian sides of this office are eliminated and everyone will regret the lost humanity. That is, the illusions will disappear, but they were! I wrote about the world, about Polis, there was some kind of novel, songs, then yes. Well, yes, 12 years have passed, so many years of life against the backdrop of this surname, sadness. Then, in order to dispel it, according to the points.

1. That's what will happen to rallies now? Indeed, now the theme of good-subject attitude towards rallies and other civil activity (interviewing Surkov on Saturday) has been removed from political power-no one has represented it there. At the same time, the pre- and postponement design itself squinted at the same time: the protests were not attached to Churov, belonged to the general dissatisfaction that Surkov fully personified. And now who represents her, whom to make an addressee? Not Putin really.

2. It is curious that this moment is already felt intuitively -on Facebook, a statement is already overwhelmed by Andrey Moroz, which is touching even stylistically: " Andrey Moroz Friends! All who saved posters, especially persons, all who have relatives-do-the-familiar relatives of relatives, etc., who made themselves or received from someone from someone Places for 5-10-24-next everywhere! Please do not tear them out, save them!
That is, the historical moment is felt closed - otherwise there would be no desire to proceed with its memorialization. Moreover, not in private ("they will be very useful to us", the exhibition). And why, if not for the arrangement of collective memory through the compilation of herbarium?

3. Immediately and a completely intimate moment. All these posters ... And the very fact of creatives on Watman and their demonstration at the rally, he meant who, in fact, should see them? Who exactly was shown, did they want to show? Not a scene with speakers.

4. For balance and another intimate moment. Having made statements last Saturday about the best part of society and the most productive, Surkov already knew about the imminent decision of D.A. Medvedev? Judging by a somewhat exalted statement after leaving the AP (" stabilization devours its children ") - it seems, no. Judging by the quoting of Huxley (saying that " too odious for a beautiful new world ")-after all, yes. That is, in the amount it turns out that he already knew, so he gracefully divorced everyone, saying cute words to the protesters, although for him they were no longer provided with anything. But, on the other (the Kremlin) side, he used the event of personal personnel life for the benefit of the peace of society in favor of the authorities. But there is no more sense in the study of shades of the Kremlin style - as Deputy Prime Minister, thin stylistic moves are unlikely to be formed.

5. "Our" has already positively accepted a new purpose. Because " in the government, he is even modernizing the country faster ." And they themselves promise to " work in the same mode as usually " and do not expect any changes. This, of course, is only a dungeon and Fedorenchik, but they are unlikely to broadcast their own hope. Everything will be fine with them, since they feel the need not only to speak out about his departure, but they do not perceive it as leaving.

6. The topic of development of innovation through "ours" is fun. But the topic of innovation through the deputy prime minister Surkov is another matter . Moreover, there is no state for it, which means that it is necessary (that is, you can) build it. A sort of completely clean sheet. Moreover, immediately the budget, which will clearly be-innovation, all in the opposite (that V. Surkov will not convince the future prime minister, what is it likely? Since he had to listen to his reasoning about his current place in life?)
In addition, innovation is potentially such a wonderful thing that they are even more uncertain than even domestic politics. Well, in fact - what types of activities can be tightened to innovative in the framework of their supervision with a specialized vice? That is, even like this: and which cannot be fitted? And next to both the theme of the Great Government, and other joys - in a word, you need to read the blog of Helman, there will be about all this.

7. There is still a part of a party, and this is an important topic. Maybe the most important here. This is not even about the party itself, but about culture and power. After all, Volodin is unlikely to write about Miro and Polis, and the enlightened representatives of the authorities themselves must be somewhere. Here, for example, is a "Russian pioneer", how will it be now?
This is that the theme of power and culture is implemented in this publication, which successfully corrects the option "power and culture as a certain format of the Russian hemisphere." That is, there are cultural figures special, and the power is also some kind of vaguely vague. But in total (like some kind of biathlon)-yes, this is the cultural and political elite. About the way Prokhorov wrote (playfully) in December last year: “ To write in the Russian Pioneer magazine there is no desire at all. The magazine, actually, the dumb (albeit mine)-continues the Soviet post -x traditional tradition of the technical and engineering intelligentsia to do everything (to hear a cultural person), if only a professional business .”
Well, there is also money on the side, but here the topic of this isolation is curious. "Russian pioneer" - yes, but no perone of the perone of this circle went outside this circle. Which, in fact, confirms the presence of a closed society. Although it is not simple here: does S. Minaev belong to him, for example,? It seems to be, although this must already be studied specifically, which will be a dull cultural of intimate communities.

7. And since Surkov functioned in this hemite, being his hero, does a new purpose mean that the topic goes from purely cultural-political to the instrumental zone? This, of course, is not seriously, but I approximately pretend to be on which side I could approach the topic mentioned above M. Gelman.

8. Yes, that's the matter! And then he wrote and could not understand that here the "Russian pioneer" crawls out. So it’s just about the relationship of Surkov and Prokhorov after the congress of the “right -hand business” in the summer and the statements of the MDP about the Surkov puppeteer . The publisher, in fact, against the Columnist of his publication, is lovely! Well, what will happen to the relations of these two citizens? Roizman already said yesterday that Prokhorov had achieved his own, Surkov was dismissed in fact. Another thing is that Prokhorov had the idea of ​​how to defeat Surkov - becoming his boss, and here - differently. But, in general, almost like that: what will Surkov do without the same Prokhorov as an enlightened oligarch on an innovative field?
And, in fact, why is this Surkov so Prokhorov in the summer, and even so aesthetically, in the sense - through Bogdanov -Dunaev?

Otherwise, everything will be fine. The change of career of V.Yu. Surkov is on the full basis. For example, on June 8, 2007, in the Russian Academy of Sciences, within the framework of the Days of Russian Political Culture, Vladislav Surkov gave a lecture “Russian Political Culture-a look from utopia” at the Academy of Sciences, after which he disputes with the audience (oh, Minaev was present and even expressed his approval!)

We look at the lecture on points and we find that many of them miraculously correspond to the future activities of V. Surkov as Deputy Prime Minister for innovation. Of course, then he had more about domestic policy and sovereign democracy, but also about innovation. Here is almost a row: “ But why are we plague, if we are so highly qualified and educated? ... No university has a specialization on steam and gas topics. And this is the most common technology in the world. In agricultural institutes, students are taught on a technique that has become possible in the 60s of the last century.”

So everything comes true. Everything will be fine with culture - in the version of the human person of the executive branch: “ We need a new method so that the future affects the current policy. Otherwise, we will see in the future: officials on the pipe, there are no personnel, raw materials are most important than everything else. But there is no military, some other advantage separately, there is only a cultural advantage .”

Moreover, " it is clear that the culture matters. Decisive ." And then - a key phrase for activity in a new field: “ Is the nation capable of non -violent mobilization? ”, And followed by the ontological conclusion: “ And who forced us to be slaves? Yes, themselves .”