Wild field

From the editorial office. After the massacres of Kushchevskaya, who threated throughout Russia, new curious facts about the life of Sergei Tsapk, the leader of the gang, who had committed cruel reprisal, began to open. In particular, it turned out that shortly before that, the Tsapok defended his thesis, which analyzed various models of society management. The Russian Journal decided to return to this story again and publish new hitherto unknown details about the “young scientist” and its scientific successes.

* * *

“ It seems that by implanting any value system, one can force the world to change according to the logic of this system. The results of our studies make us doubt this. The valuable values, as brought to the collective farm yard of synchrofazatron, are adapted to arrange a chicken coop, which in the absence of nuclear physicists in the village of nuclear -nuclear people, ”Sergei Tsapok thinks in his dissertation, who had been holding the sadly famous village of Kushchevskaya for many years.

Tsapok turned out to be ambiguous. In the intervals between dashing raids on farmers and a street robbery, Tsapok wrote a candidate dissertation. The dissertation is thorough, the list of primary sources is impressive. What did the fierce bandit look for in the writings of the philosopher Mamardashvili, the sociologist of Chesnokova and the methodologist of Shchedrovitsky?

Many believe that Tsapok simply bought his dissertation and the research of such scientists as Shchedrovitsky, Chesnokov or Mamardashvili could not be interested, most likely, he never even heard such names.

I really bought a dissertation of his Kushchevsky bandit. The attitude to his defense by the dissertation commission costs separate words. “ And he had a decent suit! ". Here is the only detail that one of the members of the commission was restored in memory. “ And after protection, he arranged a banquet for us in an ordinary eatery, so -so cafe, and the table was poor ,” another member of the commission echoes him. And not a word about the work itself! It seems that the comrades of scientists themselves set the tone for young applicants. Having flicked all my friends since the students, I managed to meet with an employee of the Rostov Technological Institute of Service and Tourism, who helped Vakalka to write a dissertation or, let's say, wrote for him work. So, he claims that Tsapka cannot be called a great intellectual, but he was not a stupid frost: he was not:

“ During one of our meetings, I tried, by the way, at the initiative of Tsapk himself, to tell him about the features of building a vertical of relations in a rural team in accordance with the research of the Moscow-Tartus Semiotic school. I mean research by Yuri Lotman and Boris Uspensky. He listened to me for some time (not for long), then he said: “Here I am like you do not like. You can’t make money, wimps, you can’t break any reason. I don’t respect these, I despise. But ... I am interested in you . ”

Tsapok was really interested in philosophical scientific developments, moreover, exclusively in their direct practical application. For what? It seems that he tried to find the most rational ways to manage groups of people.

Tsapok tried to crawl into power with all his might. And after all, he succeeded! He became a district deputy, and then a member of the Council of Young Deputies of the Krasnodar Territory, actively participated in public events. The candidate dissertation on sociology was one step on the career ladder to great power.

The Tsapka treatise is largely built on real surveys of local residents. Everything is as it should be: tables, calculations ... from a survey. Former school teacher, now pensioner Andrei Vasilievich:

“ The dissertation, say, defended? Not surprised. The scumbag was with a clogging. The jokes walked around the village. His six almost to his death did not score for the nonsense of a local guy from vocational schools. So Tsapok instructed him: “The devil plays you when you do not think for sure. Beat in moderation! " Well, how do you like philosophy? "

But this phrase is not someone, but Mamardashvili himself!

“ Why does he need a dissertation? - asks another resident of the village. - He thought that since everything was seized with him, then here it was necessary to stake up. This is a step into great power, so why not get out on it until the chickens are pecking money . ”

Destroying conversations that Tsapok just grabbed pieces from other people's work on the Internet were not confirmed. Not compilation. In any case, the protection of the Tsapka was remembered by his official opponents.

“ It is impossible to say whether they helped him write a dissertation or not, but the fact is a fact - he defended himself clearly, was absolutely aware of the text, operated by complex concepts,” says Tatyana Marchenko’s opponent, the opponent of Tsapka. - He answered all questions with knowledge. In defense, it happens that people fainted from excitement, and he was very calm. No one had thoughts that it was some kind of exotic person. But still, he was unlikely to write a dissertation out of love for science. It is possible that I wanted to know deeper the environment in which it “works”. He, I think, had a practical interest . ”

Judging by the content of the dissertation, Tsapka was especially interested in two topics: the protest potential of the peasants and the Orthodox economic ethos. From the survey. Former employee of the Artex-AGRO agricultural company Leonid:

“ Seryozha was quickly fucked up that the police have nothing to fear, if someone raises his head, then only ordinary residents. So I started to reason - will we rebel or not? Yes, he only worried in vain. An hour lasted a massacre in the Ameetov house, screams were heard, but no one went out, they did not even call the police. Why were they silent for so many years? I do not know what happened to us. We thought it was so everywhere and what would you do here . ”

Tsapok thought paradoxically. Orthodoxy is customary to be attributed to unproductive cultures. Competition, success, as an elevation over others, is not included in our economic ethos. And this, it seems, is unproductive, at least some liberal economists think. However, the Orthodox economic person represents the economy as a very harmonious world, where everyone hardly plays their roles. If there is a will that can determine his role to everyone, then the Orthodox model will work like a clock, and it is much more profitable than any productive culture model, Protestant, for example. So Tsapok thought. He saw the problem only in the assimilation of the Orthodox economic model. He believed that this is due to a small degree of churching people and the weak knowledge of the foundations of faith. Tsapok was interested in the works of sociologist Valentina Chesnokova, who estimated the degree of churching of modern Russian society at a level of no more than forty percent.

Tsapok was interested in social design, showed interest in the works of the sociologist Shchedrovitsky.

“ Shchedrovitsky had the idea that the worldview can be changed by swing, it is enough to come up with a suitable control model, ” says Tatyana Markova, doctor of sociological sciences. - Can you imagine what a misfortune would be if the worldview really changed not evolutionarily, but at once under someone else's influence? Society of Zombies. It is good that so far such a model has not been invented, and it is unlikely that this is generally possible . ”

The fact that of all possible ways to control society, he chose supernatoly. Most of the villagers are asked from the Dsapka questionnaire, which they are currently afraid of, answered - to become a victim of a crime. Hearing such answers, Sergei probably experienced deep satisfaction, because his intimidation method worked. The village bowed to the night power.

Tsapok wanted to know whether it was possible to apply, say, the methods of Shchedrovitsky for his selfish purposes. And how does it interfere, but maybe, on the contrary, faith contributes to? The Tsapka gang already had his own ideology. At the forefront, they put sports and discipline. Tsapok vigilantly made sure that his bandits visited the church, on Easter the whole lads would be present at worship. The Tsapkovsky thought about the younger generation, arrived children from a local school, especially orphans, forbade drinking and smoking, strictly ordered in the evenings to go to the gym, where specially invited instructors from Rostov were engaged in hand -to -hand combat. The leaders were strictly monitored by the fulfillment of their instructions. For disobedience, they punished hard. In a certain circle of youth, getting to the Tsaks - it was like making a good career. Agree, Tsapok formed his gang sequentially and competently, with an sight for the future.

From conversations with the inhabitants of Kushchevka, such a moment was remembered. “ Tsapok was a demon, and you want to imagine him with an ordinary gopot. If it were not for the case of this terrible massacre, when 12 people killed his six, Seryozha would soon break into power . ” And what? After all, I would break through! And we would rule us-purely scientific.