Is it a Russian march?

It so happened that I was born in Uzbekistan, in the city of Navoi. When the Soviet Union left Russia (excuse me, the language for a different wording does not turn), my loved ones and I felt all the charms of nationalism. Nationalism of Uzbek. I will not paint the details of how people become "forced immigrants". This is not about that, but about to whom some citizens of our country want to become like.

There is one interesting tribe in Africa. When trouble happens in it, the natives perform a series of the same actions. First, they go to the sorcerers and ask if anyone had spoiled. If the answer is negative, they send messengers to neighboring tribes, whether the neighbors cursed them. If there is a mistake here, then the natives begin to make sacrifices to their gods. If this does not help, then they make a large bonfire and dance around it, beating themselves with whips. At the same time, they ask for forgiveness from the Supreme God for the fact that they were too versed, that their people have forgotten how to be alive.

As for the "Russian march", here we see the natives who are firmly entrenched in the second stage, when someone else, roughly speaking, is to blame for all troubles. The only problem is that the tribe is not neighboring, it is to some extent ours. He lives on our land, and according to our laws it should. But something still does not glue. It is not glued because some of our tribe does not put its other part of it. This is, according to the "offended" part. Why is such injustice? Or maybe because the tribe is no longer there? Any people, if this is not a crowd, is based on national identity. On a certain norm that each of the members of this people follows. But do we have this norm? Rather, not even so: do we follow her? Or are we trying to cross the blame for our carelessness on the shoulders of others?

So, if we formulate the problem that our "marching" want to solve, then it sounds like this: "We have everything shitty, someone is to blame for this. And we even know who. This is they!" In principle, the beginning of this formulation is familiar to everyone. Indeed, life in Russia is far from ideal. But let's be extremely honest, the standard of living has become better than in the nineties. When was the last time you heard about the strikes of miners, teachers, doctors? Nobody introduced the police regime in the country, therefore, they really stopped going far off. So, the standard of living has increased. And, apparently, although slowly, with costs, but the quality of life will increase further.

But then a group of comrades suddenly appears who begin to scream that this is all not true. That in fact we live poorly, that the Jews (khachi, chocks, etc.) are to blame for everything. And then follows such a simple concept of patriotism from the "Russian marching": "We need to regain Russia." In the sense that it is necessary to free her from the dominance and power of non -Russian ones. And here we are faced with one creepy chimera. The fact that at first glance even adequate people seems to be wild, but patriotism, is actually a completely anti -Russian and anti -Russian phenomenon.

Let's figure out why. Who is marching with us? Gentiles, "Orthodox gonfalons" and fascists. For the former, Russia has been under the yoke of the "Journal of Orthodox Church" for more than a thousand years. For the "Borensers" the main enemy who oppresses Russia is a Jimsoon conspiracy. (The first Masons, by the way, appear in Russia under Catherine II.) For the Nazis, the main enemy - the Jewish communities. That is, since 1917, Russia has not belonged to itself. A logical conclusion arises: for representatives of these organizations, the Russian people are cattle. These are the people of born slaves. The people who only expect that he will be captured, subordinate and trampled. Not a people, but a herd of sheep, in a word. If this is patriotism, then you can write me down in Masons. I am about the Russian people a few best opinions.

Let's go on. There is such an organization of DPNI. Judging by the name, everything seems to be decorous, noble. Illegal immigration is, of course, it is not good. But only sees the main enemies of Russia, Mr. Potkin (Aka Belov) in Moldovan builders? You are a good opinion about the people, I can not say anything. I have one friend, he proposed a cheerful method of ideological struggle with DPNI. You can create a "movement of illegal immigrants" and release a booklet "Labor and Days", in which to place all the objects that built illegal immigrants. Do not understand the wrong thing, this is not the fact that illegal immigration is a useful and necessary matter. Just the opposite. But you need to deal with this phenomenon differently.

No need to cut off some national minorities and look for a "universal conspiracy." It is necessary to begin to cultivate their national self -awareness ourselves. Why break someone else's, if it is more logical (though harder) to build your own? In the position "these are national minorities, and we are the great Russian people" is already a defeat. Never Russian national consciousness has been antidiasporal. If other peoples came to the territory of Russia, then very soon they became part of the Russian people. It’s just that then the Russian people had a kind of spiritual rod. And the Russian people respect themselves. The rest, seeing this firmness and this self -esteem, themselves tried to resemble the Russians. But times are changing. Apparently, now to create something, and especially in yourself, has become too difficult. It is easier to walk a march. Better if with a face.

In general, some kind of strange logic, don't you find? To "return Russia to Russians", we will go marching. For that matter, Russia is already for the Russians, we are here a dominant nation. The only problem is that what are the Russians, such is Russia.

Imagine the situation: you wanted to build a house on your land. What will you do? That's right, buy building materials, pour the foundation, begin to build, in general. And what do the dpnishniki offer us and others like them? That's right, march! To build a house on your site, you need to mint a step around the perimeter of your territory. So that, God forbid, the neighbors did not think that this earth could be taken from you. Yes, do not forget to run with a club for everyone who came to visit you. As a result of such a "construction" you or "ambulance" will be called, or simply beat the whole world.

So is it really a Russian march? What is his "Russianness"? That we recognize ourselves as a pathological slave cattle? Or is that we sign in the absence of national identity? After all, only a crowd, but not the people unite at the moment when there is an external enemy. Or maybe in our own mental inferiority, if we believe that the future of Russia can be built by standing in a column of three?

No. Something does not look like a national idea. Rather, it is some kind of anti-national. Let's look at others, let's see how strong, scary and bad and? We brush with grief. For more, we, "slaves from birth", are not enough for the mind.

He always considered himself Russian, although he never took part in the marches against "non -Russian" participation. The only march in which I always take part is the procession on Easter. He is not against "someone else's." He is for everyone, for love and brotherhood, for the unity that external enemies are not needed. There is simply no Jew, nor Hellenic, or circumcised, or uncircumcised in his kingdom, but everything is in all love. And excuse me, for me this supposedly Russian march is a wild phenomenon. Against whom is he? Apparently, against the Russians.