The presidency of the failure

When the decree was released, people read the following words in it: “Everyone will gather to participate in the elections, make up the punishers, writing them in notebooks, and hand them to their representatives”; France seemed to hit electric shock ....

…………………

“He who collects the people pushes him to a riot,” said Cardinal de Retz.

Alexander Dumas, "Volunteer ninety -second year"

God sees, I am far from the thought, in order to always say about Putin that his bees are wrong and that his honey is wrong. I rather liked his article on the problems of democracy and the state. Moreover, my idea about the revival of the Institute of Judicial Reporters fell into it in some ways. "It is necessary to revive" judicial "journalism, which will allow more broadly and deeper to discuss the legal problems of society, to increase the level of legal awareness of citizens." In any case, I did not read about this to anyone (except myself and Putin) - not in the key to the development of freedoms of the media, but in the key of the necessary element of the judicial reform and in the paragraph “On the development of the judicial system”, in the subparagraph “four”.

I write about this, of course, swelling with pride. However, I also experience some irritation. Well, well, we - I and Putin - understand that we need such an institution that would illuminate the whole judicial floodlight, would pull the judges into public space, and we would look at them, what kind of people they would compose the base of their decisions throughout the country, etc., and then what? I have no money for myself, not like some serious institution. It is understood that we should ask for money from the oligarchs, from crime? But what will happen then? How and when will this wise idea crawl to implementation?

Or here again, Putin’s plot about district police officers. What you need, they say, to establish a connection with them and put under the public. That's right, you need to start from below! In particular, Putin was worried about that "citizens most often cannot learn about his district police officer on the Internet at all." And you need to notice that recently a certain need forced me to go to my district police officer. I can even name his last name - Egorov, because it is written on the doors, which it was not a problem to find out without the Internet. However, the problem arose in a completely different way. I came to him in one day - but he is not there. He came to the second - he is not there again. He came to the third - he still is not there.

I ask a certain old man - a veteran of law enforcement agencies (and near the Road of the Council of Veterans, and the old man is here as if for everyone on the Atas), and where is the district police officer? The old man answers like politely, but starting to be angry. Type “all sorts of”, distracting, and the district police officer works! Where does it work? On the site! The district police officer, according to his version, works at night, sits in ambush, catches bandits, and therefore he cannot serve you during the day. And the reception clock, by the way, day.

“Good,” I ask, “but what will it happen, how to find a district police officer?” At least you can call him a cell phone? " “No,” the malicious old man replies, “they don’t allocate money for us for a cell phone, but he will not give you your personal number, therefore, you cannot call him in any way. Leave the note, I will ever give it to him. ” These are the relations with the district police officers - through the hollow, as in the time of Dubrovsky.

So the question is, so that the district police officer at the place of reception is at the place of reception, for this, do you need some inconceivable reform, twelve years of continuous state building, some kind of superficial plan of Putin, Putin himself, his strategy 2020 and public advice on the side? No, only the regulations and its honest implementation! The fulfillment by the state of the obligations already paid by the budget, enshrined in the laws.

What would Putin not trace how his vertical works in reality?

***

Smart people have already read the article by Putin for the words used in it. The word "is needed" jumped out. That is, he got an article about the abstract obligation of certain socially useful actions. “It would be nice if ...” and it is clear why it happened ...

The fact is that experts wrote an article for Putin, and they could not turn to a large boss with the words that “he should.” Impolite, and the big boss in Russian tradition owes nothing to anyone. To think that a big boss should you something is either a sin, or even worse, "the excitement of hatred or enmity, as well as the humiliation of human dignity."

The large boss does not even participate in the debate, because (attention, explanation!) He is with everyone in "incompetent political categories." It couldn’t occur to anyone that debates are organized not only for him, so that he would be convenient, but also for voters, so that they can look at his spontaneous reactions - suddenly they will begin to bite. However, as I have already noticed, there is no question of you in this situation.

Relations with the country have Lapidar Big Boss. The country asks the great boss: will we do this and so? The big boss replies: you know, I thought for a long time, shoveled a thousand -year history, appealed to the spirits of Russian philosophers and decided, no, we will not do that. And all - the question is closed. The country on the knees crawls to the exit. That is why the experts wrote for Putin the Putin text in an impersonal form: they must. Bearing in mind that, in fact, the authorities must, but in the hope that the big boss will somehow extend this to himself. They issued an examination in the form of a petition. Rather, the petition was hidden in the examination.

Further, however, the text goes to the addressee, and the addressee likes it. The big boss corrects a couple of commas, puts his signature, not really understanding who the petition is from and to whom. Everything is finally confused because the intonation has not changed. Now it turns out that we owe him, and he demands. Or someone owes him, and he is waiting.

He waited twelve years, and this is what he needed, what he was waiting for, they would not bring anyway. But now, in the next four years, he will definitely be on being brought.

***

It is noted that political reforms have recently rained down like a cornucopia.

Then they were not there, otherwise they suddenly went - about publicity, and about democratization, and about acceleration in the economy. And although the word "perestroika" is prohibited with us, it was precisely that a hundred percent restructuring came out. But here is what I would like to ask - both rhetorically and at the expert community. And if not for the unfortunate need for elections, which, by the grace of Medvedev, had become more rare than before, Putin would think about the "Putin's program?" Of course, no! Why does he need this? After all, six months ago, he and his ruling party simply glistened with pleasure, as they have everything well.

We will ask the second question: and if there were no monstrous fall in the popularity of the tandem and the December speeches of the "angry townspeople", would novels about democratic transformations fall into this program? And again we will answer: no! Because no common sense can explain why it was necessary to sleep for two and a half years, especially after the article “Russia, forward!”, Then, in the end, in a fire order to dump a whole package, and turn into Putin into a publicist.

And it turns out that all these reforms ... are forced, and the political results of the tandem are failure. We counted on one, but it turned out another. Hence the conclusion: being forced - these reforms were terribly late, and this is already irreversibly. After all, if you were late on the plane, and your ticket disappeared, then it is too late to jump on one leg and offer to build a new airport. The plane flew away, there will be no other. Now they will put pressure on this power, and it will fight back - the situation for the future is thought of.

An even greater failure is as follows. For the entire time of his presidency, Putin did not ensure the transit of the political system from the authoritarian model to institutional. “Thinking a lot”, he did not set such a task for himself, closing control on himself and his surname. So he liked, so it seemed successful, so much liked his environment, and this given was praised by the servile expert community.

As a result, when the love of the people has passed, there was not a single institution that would be able to catch the banner of power from his weakening hands. We turned out to be on the ruins. Until now, they comforted themselves with a historical memory and a continuous millennium history, and suddenly it turned out that here the horse did not lie, and there, as if we had just come to this world. And the judicial system is only to start and build. And corruption - here we will put up the sleeves and push. And there are no political parties - we must urgently invite. And again to revive the elected traditions that we canceled. From somewhere again the pre-revolutionary word "zemstvo" jumped out again. It seems that the problems that had crowded at the door for a hundred years squeezed into the hall at once, and the third term of Putin’s presidency, not yet begun, becomes the presidency of the national disaster.