DRENED people

One faithful statesman wondered: why is everything constantly improving in our country (as far as I remember, it has always improved), but nevertheless there is still permanently not enough? And the living standards are growing, and the discipline is getting stronger, and the industry has risen (in the sense of the feet), and again we are the first to produce Kalashnikov machine guns, and for some reason the people do not love the police, nor the prosecutor’s office, and even more so the courts. And how to do so to fall in love? Obviously, in the thesis of this fair percentage of observation and realism made from it. After all, our statesman noticed that the people did not like the people, the prosecutor’s office, the courts did not like (he even used the expression “hates” in a burning expression), and at the same time, ask him, for some reason, for some reason, is sure that the people and the patriot who loves the foundations of their life, and the God-bearer, believes that these are the foundations from a special god. Not Catholic, not Hindu, not Jewish and not Chukchic, but Orthodox ...

So I think: does he understand, our statesman, that thereby discovered the prospect of the "damned" from the "damned Russian issues" - but do we have a good people? For there can be bad grounds for a good life, otherwise someone turns out to be wrong. Either we think wrong about the grounds, or we have, frankly, crazy, but not at all a God -bearer.

* * *

Moreover, the problem turned out to be not simple, but two -level, with a dialectical harden. For each level, the response is positive, but in total in level - it seems like a negative one. Follow ...

Our people cannot be bad, because, firstly, no people are especially bad. But at the same time, he is also a source of power, which is not just good, but the best in the last thousand years (with an emphasis on the last seven), since for the first time we have developed a civilized democracy. And he speaks our people with a great and powerful, language of truth and friendship, but not at all hatred and enmity, like others, ordinary peoples. What was noticed by the president. And this is the first level.

The second level: our people - if the population is considered a people - cannot be bad, because it is eighty percent of Russian nationality. And the Russians are known, it is known, the best people in the world, it is enough to read the press.

After the Russians, according to mainstream journalism, only lower races go. crests - they come to arrange "marches of disagreements." Baltic states - kinship do not remember and demolish monuments. Poles - drive rotten meat. As for the Western Europeans in Internet forums, a metaphor is often used: "We will never sit with these Europeans in the same field." The Americans are the fascination of Hell is unambiguous. So, by the second level, the answer is “yes”.

And together, oddly enough, the answer is still “no”, since the basis of Russian life is the police -police, and if we take it in a historical perspective, then the oprichnina (not so long ago, the patriots demonstratively went to the demonstration under the banner of the Glory of the Army) - the people are hated by the people. Everything is crumbling because there is a clear contradiction. It turns out that the people - as a kind of aggregate state, which make up which, each individually, do not deserve confidence - refuses trust and with all their derivatives.

What to crush this people according to ideological strata - the commies and liberals are obtained, that according to the political ones, demryzes and nationalists are obtained.

That in the way of life and professional activity. Since the intelligentsia here is demons. The capitalists are bloodsuckers. Officials are bureaucrats. Bureaucrats are corrupt officials. Traffic cops are bribe takers. Justice is criminal. The opposition is corrupt. The elections are fused. Disagent - enemies. The consonants are fools. Parliament is a unanimous. Parties - do not reflect the interests of voters. NPO - chemicals on grants. All grants are from the CIA. Estrem - Serduchka. Doctors - killers. Nazide is fun. Love is blood. Customs - takes good.

Everything crumbles literally into dust. But how does everyone get into balance again, if we agree that the people are rubbish, which is why the rod is rubbish, the plans are rubbish and the results are also rubbish.

* * *

I would not bother on this topic, but for some time I decided to lead the dossier, in particular, according to law enforcement officers of the existing remarkable order. And then he threw it. Because conducting such a dossier, it turned out, is very easy. Click once - and there will be a hundred links, click two - and there will be two hundred links. But what to do next with them is not clear. As I once wrote, the idea of ​​such a dossier has outlived itself after a television port that ended in the words: "Policeers often go into the gangs of killers." After that, what dossier? About what?

But I myself witnessed the episodes of almost an epic. Once I met my acquaintance scientist with a policeman in a not yet dark forest park. And he, when he called out to check the documents, suddenly grabbed his cell phone and quickly fled, thereby creating a symbolic performance worthy of the pen of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, Shukshin and Solzhenitsyn. Since run after a policeman with a cry "Hold the thief!" - It will turn out very fantastic. Well, how will both then turn around and run in the opposite direction, and the policeman will also grab a hat? And after all, these two characters of Russian history, back and forth, run to infinity. Sisyphs are a citizen and gendarme. "Where are you running, Rus'? There is no answer."

Presenting all this to himself and opening his mouth in amazement, my friend remained to stand a pillar, tearing the circle of fate. And in vain. Because the fate of the people is a derivative from their collective unconscious, and even more - from the collective conscious, and an individual can not tear anything away. And it’s not that the way of thinking was somehow especially cruel, although it was hard too, but specifically always for some reason is empty, they can’t get happiness from them.

* * *

You can look for epoch -making examples. It is possible - domestic and small, in which, as in a drop of water, the ocean is reflected. Here, for example, a discussion of homeless dogs, which "can bite off the pen", is being started in LiveJournal. " The proposals come in a variety of sentences - from "catch" to "eliminate" - I have the stupidity of homeless dogs to regret. And then I get a thousand mails in my mailbox with the proposal of "the author to feed these dogs."

And not that I would not really agree, but I was amazed that the solution to the issue, in general, is typical for a given area and people. Immediately move from the idea of ​​reducing the number of homeless dogs to the idea of ​​their constant growth, so that all authors are enough. Which, in turn, in no way, in meaning, is not different from the proposals to drive an aspen stake into the coffin to the deceased President Yeltsin, of which I also heard in a huge amount. It’s not that it is not that ethical (ethics is related to social consensus, and if there is a consensus, then it is ethical), and the emphasized unrealizability of the plan (well, where, for example, you will take a stake, how will you get into the cemetery, how will you drive it into a marble pedestal?). And the emphasized inconspicuity of the plan born to the inflamed consciousness with a public good (well, have a stake - the well -being improved?)

By the way, the dogs surfaced again - at the parliament level. There is such a best representative of the people - deputy Abelsev. Russian, higher education, graduated from the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School named after the Supreme Council of the RSFSR, and beliefs - military. He does not like the opposition - this is his right. Suppose that our opposition is vile. However, what does the deputy of the people of Abelsev offer?

“The man comes out three hundred and four and begins to dictate to the whole of Russia, Bl ..,” says the military deputy Abelsev with the language of truth and friendship, but not at all hatred and enmity. “After all, Moscow is full of frantic dogs. I propose to catch these frantic dogs, b ...., and release on this crowd, b ....”.

Not a matter of vocabulary. We will not find fault with the words, and we do not want to stroke the deputy Abeltsev. But let's mentally implement his proposal. There will be no happiness, but there will be a problem that he has not thought about. Just as Khrushchev did not think about communism at one time, and some of the latter are about nanotechnology. Where to get so many frantic dogs?

Moreover, it is not at all a fact that Moscow homeless dogs are crazy. According to my observations, they evolve in the direction of public progress, use public transport (metro) and cross the road exclusively along the pedestrian paths to the green traffic light. But, for example, Abeltsev has the opportunity to infect these good homeless Moscow dogs with rabies - in horror films this option is regularly rolled up ... But then a complete absurdity is to bring frantic dogs to Pushkin Square (not far from the Kremlin), where lovers meet, where mothers and children walk, where foreigners look with a critical look, and ... let them out.

Christmas trees, firing, they will have a bite of all without analysis, and then scatter!

And even if they have a snack exclusively the opposition, as planned, there will be a frantic opposition, is this the purpose of the unanimous parliament?

In general, from this parliament, such uninvited proposals often come.

* * *

Okay, I'm finishing. The text turned out a little Russophobic. But he described how I saw how I felt, and I myself am Russian, and the Russians, as I have already noticed, the people of the crappy.