When the rafters fall

The social system, which has developed in the Russian Federation by the beginning of the tenths of the twenty -first century, is increasingly called "feudalism." It may seem that this is an undeserved insult. In fact, this is an undeserved compliment.

Classical feudalism is ultimately the “division of labor”: the peasant plows the earth, and war, politics, international relations, science, art and other troublesome classes are the lot of the feudal lord. The feudal lords are killed on the battlefield and as a result of conspiracies, they lose their destinies, get married not for love, etc. All these “natural encumbrances” give the feudal lord the moral right to a privileged position, and the peasant to recognize him. The harder it lives, the easier it is for the peasant to take the hardships of their position. And vice versa, the emancipation of the master deprives him of moral right to dominance ...

“The latest aristocracy” (“Elite”), which has taken shape in modern Russia, has, in general, of any moral right to privilege. And never had. In the current “elite”, not merits to the Fatherland and not even the antiquity of the genus, but money, lead. Moreover, money purchased dishonorable . Moreover, if previously it was about the pantas of fate or dexterous scammers, now the lion's share of the “elite” is bribes, dashingly, embezzlers and other knowing crooks.

As Sergei Polonsky correctly noted, "who does not have a billion - goes to the ass." He fully experienced the justice of this aphorism. Indeed, the powers of the "latest Russian aristocrat" expire exactly at the moment when he loses the coveted billion. As in a fairy tale about Cinderella. So, to destroy the “latest Russian aristocracy”, Napalm is not needed. It is enough to reset the bills ...

The "grave of" classical feudalism is the bourgeois. In the world, the aristocracy decomposes and turns into a class of parasites. On the other hand, there is a class of economically independent commoners capable of raising the question of "terminating the contract unilaterally." When the critical mass of such people accumulates, the country's social system is brought into line with new realities.

Let's get back to our country. Our "aristocracy" was born dead, from the dead mother. Her rights are worse than birds. An immodest question arises by itself: why are they still not overthrown? The answer is obvious: because in Russia there is no bourgeois . And who is? “Middle class” - that is, a layer of people “bourgeois -consuming”. But as a banana eaten at breakfast does not turn a person into a monkey, so bought on a Kashkai credit or diving into a charm al-Sheikh does not turn him into a bourgeois. There is no economic independence - there is nothing. The bourgeois cannot be fired. You cannot deprive livelihood. The bourgeois is one who stands tight on his feet.

In the Russian Federation, this class did not work out. The microscopic small business itself today is almost one hundred percent of the services (and a little construction). Property in the modern Russian Federation is such a “artistic convention”: it is “as it were”, but at any moment it can “stop being”. Other, “middle class” - and at all on a salary. So, an honestly earned piece should be put in the mouth as soon as possible and swallowed without wasting time to grind and moisten with saliva. Hence the evidence of the signs of imaginary Russian "prosperity". Therefore, the Russians drink in their OL-Eli-Wheel, as the last time. And they change one good car to another, so that in six months, God will give, change to the third.

The degeneration of the classical aristocracy is always associated with the advent of lackeys - a service personnel living in master's life. Not quite master, of course. But the perfume is smelled, to convey a vest behind the barin - always please. The tragedy of people who make up the Russian “middle class” is that they are involuntarily lackeys . Young people, full of strength, energy, talents, grabbing, active, curious, with a wide horizons and developed intelligence are doomed to a humiliating role of “lamps” and “scimiters of the heels”. And on the humiliating nickname "Office Plankton".

The current “protest poet”, which has covered the Russian “middle class”, has mainly “psychotherapeutic” reasons. Therefore, the phrase "self -esteem" sounds so often. "Lackei involuntarily" painfully looking for an occasion for elementary self -esteem . And nothing more. But while the current level of consumption will remain, the “middle class” will inevitably return to the “office stall”. Not because he got hooked on the "consumer needle". He just has nowhere else to go ...

The "elite" and the "middle class" associated with it, by and large, do not need the rest of the country. And the country is in them. There are few people working in super -profitable industries. The rest: either “live on their own”, or state employees - that is, a burden. By and large, no one exploits the population today. The main sources of crazy money were created in the USSR. At present, this is the same as presented by a wizard from a blue helicopter. All the outrages surrounding us are only derivatives from the country's parasitic immoral structure. So to speak, a side effect.

Nobody shits to specially people, even “care” - “maternity capital”, “raising pensions” and other moderate blessings. People sincerely do not understand: what kind of change to wish them and therefore do not want anything.

All this ugly structure rests on a swell to the foundation of high prices for raw materials. While the foundation is intact, no real changes in the country are impossible. Because, in fact, nobody needs them. The illusions that have arisen in this electoral cycle are associated exclusively with a godlessly high assessment of the role of Comrade Putin in the history of mankind. In the best case, they will change portraits on the walls. But everything will change overnight when the raw materials are flooded. Then the harmless “Office Plankton” will give odds to the Bolsheviks.

The exile from the Office Paradise is an almost instant immersion in poverty. On the other hand, there is a thirst for revenge for the mediocre profanated best years. With the third - the skills of the exchange of information and self -organization, worked out by the current hot winter. The only weak place is ideological hunger . And this is very dangerous on steep turns of history. Because we skip them quickly, and then we rejoice that “Putin's feudalism” is still not as bloody as “Stalin”.

The only way to once again not return to the previous place is the “bourgeois revolution”, in which the bourgeoisie is not a means, but a goal . In the twentieth century, such revolutions occurred three times. All three times “from above”. The first two ended with the death of their initiators - Stolypin and Lenin (NEP). The third - Gorbachev began and betrayed Yeltsin. Like everything that comes out from above, these revolutions were loose, half -hearted, timid. All three with a bang failed.

The only example was when it was done “from below” - “revolution of roses” in Georgia. And this revolution was a success! At least she lasts the 9th year and her fruits are impressive ...

Our starting conditions so far look much more preferable. In the end, we have a whole class that has exhausted without a real case! So, the personnel hunger of our revolution definitely does not threaten. We will agree on the rest. The main thing is to start quickly. To know: where to run and what to do when the rafters fall.