Squeezing and staggering

You can go to rallies before blue, shout “Russia without Putin”, post caricatures, talk about falsifications in the elections - this will not change anything. Moreover, people who are desperate to the thought of “die under Putin” or raise children in a criminal state - more, they will pack their suitcases or hide along the holes, which will join the opposition in its current format. Already now they are persistently asking: do you offer something, what program of action? For example, Viktor Yaroshenko writes: “We were on Pushkinskaya, as before, at all except Griboed. The atmosphere has changed. There were few of us - much less than we expected. And how much more will we be fraternizing with the Nazi, who, moving around the corner, beat journalists? How much more will we listen to these Krylov, Torah? Crisis of the genre, devaluation of protest. Speech without ideas and energy. It is necessary to think more quickly and bolder, otherwise people will disperse about their business. ”

I was not on the Pushkinskaya (I was on the clean ones) - I no longer want to listen to the Naziks, chants, and I did not cause any enthusiasm for a rally on Sakharov. “And there were even more people on the Putings, and what,” the public shrugged, which they convinced that a hundred thousand were wildly cool. Well, yes, Putings for money, but she doesn’t give a damn one hundred times: Putin - again, still, for life and posthumously (since there will be nothing left of the country soon) - the president. You focused on carousels and stuffing, and did not do it in violation of the Constitution. "Two presidential terms in a row is a constitutional limit." And the Prime Minister had to leave his post when he registered the presidential candidate. But this is according to the law, which was nowhere to defend, but the topic itself did not cut off. Honest elections? So they were originally dishonest, since the same “one of the candidates” did not allow those who did not consider it necessary: ​​Ryzhkov, Navalny, Nemtsov and who else there. If the requirements of the three rallies were not fulfilled - not one - does it make sense to repeat them as a mantra? The more rallies, the more protest movement will turn into a clowning. Well, or just a meeting (authorized!) Hundreds of friends, of which twenty will fall into the routine already a car carrier. A person “from the side” does not understand how ultralel, along with the ultra -right and liberals, act as a single political education. By the way, “United Russia” (“unity” then) was collected by the unforgettable Borisabramych in the same way, indiscriminately, with the world along the thread, for the sole purpose of making Putin the president. In France, let’s say, no one would understand such illegibility in his eyes: we are not enough, but we, with such and such a platform and program, and if we have no one, then there is nothing to talk about. It is impossible to imagine Marina Le Pen (Krylov) in one connection with Jean-Lukoka Melenshon (Udaltsov), and the microscopic Front de Gauche did not first join the current presidential campaign to a large batch of socialists (Hollande)-because of ideological discrepancies-and one went. The current 10% electoral rating of Melenshon now (elections in April)-a sensation, at first there was not one. But people respect the position. Otherwise, this is the same Putin. He, for need, will appear to be any paint of the political spectrum, if only not to give the power and natural wealth of Russia, which appeared in the hands of his friends and, possibly (in the sense that it is unprovable), his own.

When they exploded at home in 1999, they poisoned with gas in Nord-Ost (not to mention the mysterious capture itself ), when Beslan was, political murders taken “under personal control”, when the election of governors were canceled, no “mass protests” were observed. Both the previous elections were falsified, and Yukos was transferred to other hands. I always considered Khodorkovsky political prisoner (resentment, they say, personal revenge), but later realized that the main thing was to reject the business, and Mikhail Borisovich was “political” only in the sense that a stranger. It is a sin not to take away 14 billion from a “stranger” (it seems that his condition was assessed, the largest in Russia), what insults!

You can go deep into history, indicating the date of the creation of the criminal state on October 25, 1917 (although you can climb deeper), but how to get out of this story? The answer to the question: what period in the history of Russia seems to us ideal, the best or at least suitable for “falling to the roots” is the answer to the question of what to do. I personally do not know such a “consensus” period. Some have the Novgorod Republic, others have Romanovs, the others have - the USSR, and still not to say that at least a segment of history Russia was indeed a subject for nostalgia.

In Putin, I admit, the trump card is hidden in the sleeve: to restore the monarchy, to put on the throne of some “his” Romanov, who will appoint him prime minister, and there will be no more elections anymore. Neither honest nor dishonest. And the extreme case is planned: in July, they are going to raise prices for housing and communal services and much more, in general-there is nowhere to take money, and they will be taken from the "aggressive-auditive" of the majority and the aggressive-listening minority. Aggressiveness and Bolshevik intolerance, by the way, is one of the unpleasant properties of many oppositionists. The property is clear - the Bolsheviks, too, are also with despair, there were no special chances, but no one else wants Bolsheviks 2.0. No one wants anti -Putinism instead of Putinism - the same, but with other names, and the “opposition” clearly does not explain his intentions. Most likely, the plans of its different parts are different. But in the summer, the population living “imprisonment” can even rebel.

If they promise him money from oil and gas, as well as gold and diamonds to distribute differently than they are distributed now (at least in Qatar, where the per capita income is about 90 thousand dollars a year, but not 300-500 per month, as ours), it will join rallies, processions and anything. Where are the roads, infrastructure, the notorious “innovations-modelization”? Nothing was done not because “there is no money”, but because they are sorry for the country and its inhabitants. Implemented in the Kremlin, I want to take everything for myself. The population, they say, is to blame for everything: everywhere arranges garbage dumps, does not repair his homes, robs and kills. And you (the government) give them interest on which they live, just give everyone three thousand dollars a month, instead of putting them in their pocket - they will lick everything, they will feel that the earth is them, not occupied.

If we talk about which model of Russia it seemed correct to me, then this is decentralization, economic independence of the regions, confederation, and not a blurry spot, conditionally called the federation, oil and gas rent to everyone (without prejudice to business), inviolability of property, referendums on important issues. It is impossible, for example, in a self -respecting state to quickly give citizenship a million Tajiks without the consent of local residents. Or is it how Medvedev took and changed the presidential term from 4 to 6 years in the Constitution without asking anyone? This is how you can write anything for your own (Putin, in this case) benefits and declare with law. No, it should not. For centuries, serfs, of course, cannot rebuild genetic memory overnight, which all from the Soviet leaders to the current vertical ones used. The power in Russia is the master, the deity and Karabas-Barabas, quilting us, worthless dolls, the clubs of their guardsmen. I agree with Simon Cordon, that Russia is a class state, was and is, and this is its difference from class societies. Most of all billionaires in the world lives in Moscow - shameful for a country where most stupidly survives or drunk and robbing, considering survival a matter of an uninteresting business.

I do not believe in the revolution from below, such as the Pugachevsky rebellion. The robbers are powerful and independent, everyone will become even more important than now. The external (world) war and internal (civil) are very likely. I believe in the "Palace Revolution", supported by the masses. It may be that the “movement” does not cool down, and it is worth making promotions such as the “White Circle” (just not these rallies that have been sore!), But it is much more important, in my opinion, to explain the meaning and plan to people, since this is another thing - since they felt a crowded game in someone else's game, and they will no longer support someone else's game. And “the foreign warehouse will not help us”: she congratulated the chosen one even before the final results are announced, she is satisfied with the status of a Quo. But Fidel Castro - for Navalny. Of course, it is pointless to generalize. When they say that in Russia, the security forces are opposed by liberals - this is not so, in all structures their scatter and staggering, and who with whom and against whom, is not easy to understand.