
Ilya Milstein, 10/16/2015
From the magazine "Branch".
Dmitry Marinichev, a hero of yesterday, made a refutation . However, he did not renounce his suffered thoughts, but complained that they were delivered to the wrong address. “The meaning of my words,” the Internet Ombudsman said almost in Russian, “was directed exclusively at those representatives of science and their opinions who were in the hall, but no way for the media.”
There was still a curious discussion between him and Alexander Chernykh, the author of the report from the Public Chamber, which immortalized the Ombudsman. And the man, similar to Mikhail Dvorkovich, the younger brother of the Russian Deputy Prime Minister, appeared in the comments, and convicted Marinichev as a “irresponsible person” who, “in fact, substitutes the president and the state with similar words and discredit government bodies,” and this sounded almost like a sentence. Severe, but partly fair.
The fact is that the speeches of Putin’s relations with the Internet, whatever they did, turned into mockery of the shrines. Regardless of whether he was learning, with a clever look, he spoke stupidly or relying his bosses. Marinicheva’s warlike cry was indistinguishable from trolling.
Thinking out loud that the “military presence” is necessary to promote our technologies to world markets, he brought to the absurdity, that is, to the logical conclusion, the main postulates of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation. Calling not to harm the country and not “invest in the preparation of IT specialists in the Russian Federation” who will “pray” to Western companies and first of all will try to leave here, ”revealed the secrets of the internal policy. Aimed at compulsory wildness of society. Secrets are long known, but still shaking hearts, when a state building is pulled out.
Such is the power to the place and to the time of the irresponsibly spoken word. Words are essentially frank and honest. Words seeking truth.
Well, however, it is impossible to “do something or import only within the framework of our country”, as the Ombudsman expresses, indicating the Americans who entrusted the whole world with their web. So it’s pointless to establish the “serial production” of Russian microprocessors and other technologies, no one will buy them anyway. But if you introduce tanks into the territory of potential customers, having previously bombed them with front -line aviation or firing from the "beech", then there will be no end to buyers. And although in the Crimea, in the Donbass, as well as in Syria, there is still no excitement demand for Russian smartphones and laptops, but this is perhaps a temporary phenomenon. Just these goods have not yet been brought, because they have not been launched into production. Obama interferes.
For the same reason, programmers should not be prepared in the territory of the Russian Federation. Why teach them if the IT -Schools are leaving “from here”, where “the United States has a monopoly right throughout the market”? Now, we add from ourselves, having familiarized themselves with the point of view of the Ombudsman, they will run in crowds. So it is not clear who will produce smart iron in Russia and generally carry out cheap chipization when we win, but these are details. It is not yet too late to close all universities, companies and other harmful enterprises in order to prevent brain leaks by eliminating them.
Dmitry Marinicheva will be punished or not punished now - a purely academic issue, for experts. It is possible or impossible today to persons close to the president, to speak out like this, with the heart, with the last directness, or we must somehow restrain themselves, from the last forces - this is all for narrow specialists. Most likely, journalists will stop letting go to where the Commissioner makes speeches, and the Ombudsman himself will be allowed to communicate only with his own kind. Temporarily, of course, because if you plug the mouth of Marinichev, then what needs to be done with Astakhov, not to mention Zhirinovsky?
The answer to another question is much more important, very practical. About what is happening in the heads of individual representatives of the ruling class and the speakers close to them. Why don't they need anyone? Pensioners, for example, are definitely not needed. Neither small nor medium -sized businesses are needed, which the most feeded banker - Kostin told the most disguised recently. Yesterday ITishnikov added to them. In short, whoever you grab - no one is in demand.
There is only one answer - a crisis, but if the state has less and less money that was exterminated during the victorious wars, and the head of VTB simply wants to take the grandmas to himself, then with high -tech production the picture is different. Marinichev was surrounded, with a clever look he spoke stupidly or enlightened his bosses, he expressed his nervousness and impatience, characteristic of people educated at the present stage. He talked about the catastrophe of the tenths, programmed during a political experiment. The fact that it is impossible to fight with the whole world and dream of some high technologies there. We must choose: either fight or cooperate.
In Ombudsmen Russian, this sounded like this: "Russia inside the global market or outside?" If we fight, then you should switch to self -service, and promote the goods to foreign markets with fire support for sub -bargaining grenade launchers. And in general, Vladimir Vladimirovich, may you finally enter the troops in Washington, it is impossible to work, the ITSHNIKS scatter! If from the third world we are going to dodge and want to live like people, then we must "play" according to the rules of competition of companies in the global market, not countries. " However, "we, citizens of the Russian Federation, can not" come to terms with the subordinate state due to historical realities ", like the Americans. This is also called a dilemma.
Such is the political testament of Marinichev - in case, if he is still fired. "For what substitutes and discredits." Moreover, there is nothing special to discuss here: to decide how to go further in Russia, it is still not for us and not to him. And it is worthwhile to take note. At the same time, trying to comprehend another question: who, in fact, who sets up and why discredit? It is not necessary to answer aloud, still few will believe today. The correct answer should be kept secret, encrypting in the computer’s memory, and convey to the descendants who will still have a cordially thank the ingenuous and talkative ombudsman - a hero of yesterday.
A pair of phrases (on a pair of phrases ) 10.10.2015
I know for sure that the power of Kyiv there in (Crimea. - Ed.), The majority, the vast majority of people recall as a nightmare, believe me. This is so.
(Daria Peshchikova) Nevertheless, initiatives are now appearing ... to allow people who live in the Crimea ... to preserve Ukrainian citizenship with Russian citizenship ...
Whose initiatives are these? .. Yes, this is not no initiative, Dash, this is an opinion that for some reason you make me discuss ... Most people are crooked from this, seeing this blue passport with a yellow trident, understand? ..
Here are the listeners suggest that Aksenov himself suggested maintaining Ukrainian passports in the Crimea.
Well, if this is Aksenov, it should be said - Aksenov suggested, the head of the Crimea ... Of course, it is important because it is the most important political decision, if it offers Aksenov ... therefore, this is the discovery of a gate for dialogue with Mustafa Dzhemilev and with the leadership of the Majlis (*) ... If this is Aksenov, then this must be completely politically understood - as a strategic solution that opens up with such a strategic solution that opens up with such enough A wide gate for generally dialogue with Kyiv and with Ukraine as such.
Maxim Shevchenko, journalist, member of the Human Rights Council
- ... whose dog? I will not leave this like that. I will show you how to dissolve dogs! .. How to finish him, a bastard, he will know from me what the dog and other vagabonds mean! I will show him Kuzkin’s mother! .. Etdyrin, - the overseer turns to the city, - find out whose dog it is, and make up the protocol! And the dog needs to be exterminated. Immediately! She is probably mad ... whose dog it is, I ask?
- This, it seems, General Zhigalov! - says someone from the crowd.
- General Zhigalov? Um! .. Take away, Elderin, a coat from me ... I just don’t understand: how could she bite you? .. You ... Famous people! I know you, devils! .. She may be dear, and if every pig will poke her cigarette in her nose, how long to spoil it for a long time. The dog is a delicate creature ... And you, a blank, lower your hand! There is nothing to put your stupid finger! It’s to blame! .. So this is their dog? Very glad ... The little dog is wow ... such a nimble ... DACTION OF THIS FING! Ha ha ha ... angry, shelma ... tsutsyk like ...
Anton Chekhov. " Hameleon "
A pair of phrases (on a pair of phrases ) 10.10.2015
In the spiritually healthy times of Rus', the state was guided by the Christian Orthodox truth. Under Peter, a “Protestant bias” began, that is, a distortion of Russian statehood in resolving not only private, but even big issues. The contradiction was not corrected ... Many are now in the imitative "St. Petersburg cycle" ... The adherence of foreign structures to universities was conceived to destroy the sphere of domestic folk education.
The West did not leave and leaves no plans to dismember or at least weaken Russia. The activities of these funds were subordinated to this ... America gave money to those who agreed to follow its attitudes to distract scientific forces to projects related to the study of far -fetched, or even false problems. For example, the study of how Western philosophy influenced the Russian. The question, as you see, is posed in such a way that the identity of Russian philosophical thought is already initially denied ... The department specialized in Russian thought was closed. And the pro -Western oriented department actually gained a monopoly. In the circle of her interests, even the notorious Hannah Arendt, who in the late 1940s equalized Stalin with Hitler in her book by the origins of "totalitarianism."
Vladimir Shulgin, former professor of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant
- Ah, reset foreigners? So this is not the only one that you are upset?
It meant to be replaced everywhere in the text “Laue proved” by the scientists to prove ”or“ as Langmühur convincingly showed ”on“ as shown ”. If some is not only Russian, but the German or Danish in the Russian service distinguished himself at least small-it was necessary to fully indicate his name-patronymic, to shade his implacable patriotism and immortal merits to science ...
- Say thank you for at least changing in advance. It is worse. There ... On the Litfac, one defended the dissertation about Cweig four years ago, has already been awarded for a long time. Suddenly they found three times in her dissertation that "Cweig is cosmopolitan", and that the dissertation approves. So she was called to the Higher Attestation Commission and the diploma was selected. Horror!
- Fu, still get up in chemistry! - Dasha answered. - Well then, to us, political officers? Climb into the loop? Nothing, breathing. Here, the rifle-Olyabyshkin, thanks, helped out!
Indeed, everyone knew that Dasha had already received the third topic for the dissertation ... Good people were numb, and Dasha remembered for herself: "The Russian Political Epo of the 19th century was the rifle-Olyabyshkin."
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. " In the first circle "
- Is that, the formula of Sabaneyev? - asked Skvortsov. He was not very strong in theory, but he remembered some surnames and, on occasion, could show off.
- No, not Sabaneyev.
- Yours?
- Right, I don't know. This formula has always been.
- As always?
- This is what they say to us. When they really began to pester the priority of Russian and Soviet scientists ...
- Understand.
I. Grekova. " Testing "
*Majlis - an extremist organization banned in the territory of the Russian Federation