Freebie

Bisystemicity of the economy - body and cancer tumor

(Economics as an antagonism of “Presonomy” and “Flyavonomiki” - a functional system and dysfunctional antisystem)

A freebie is a colloquial name for the good (profit, income, annuity, interest, margins, taxes, excise taxes, loans, loans, credit, benefits, pensions, gifts, treats, bribes, donations, dottsia, etc.), which is obtained from functionality. Otherwise: a freebie is a good, alienated from benefit, one of the derivatives of the alienation society. The alienation begins with the alienation of the values ​​of culture (culture is a functional system of relations based on a system of values) and then switches to everything, including the economic, aspects of society. The etymology of the word is multidimensional, the “freebie”, possibly, from the Hindu “halave” - a ritual dish distributed by passers -by for free; and from the Russian adversary "free" - mouth, mouth, pharynx; and from the obsolete name of the boot of the boot and cheap “frozen books”, which were worn behind the boot; And from the Hebrew “free”-milk, supposedly once distributed to Jewish children in the Hosivas of Odessa for free.

All economic theories from A. Smith to K. Marx and J. Keins, to one degree or another, work in the area of ​​the culture in which they were created, and where the factors that are adopted as the basis for these theories are significant. With a radical change in conditions, going beyond this culture, these theories do not work, or work for some time with artificial power planting, which ends with their deafening collapse. This happened with the theory of K. Marx and its fate in the USSR. This suggests that these theories do not satisfy the criteria of scientificity: the scientific theory is objective and should ensure the repeatability of the experiment under any conditions that are naturally not part of the experiment itself. And since economic theories do not provide this, it would be more correct to call them not to call them theories, but doctrines.

Actually, the economy is generally not a science in the strict sense. No one has nevertheless yet formulated the subject and method of the economy. The prediction of the economy hardly significantly exceeds the prediction of, say, astrology, and yet science is called to engage in - predictions. Either it predicts the results of natural and artificial experiments, or it is unknown what she does and is devoid of any meaning, except for the local moile of some conjuncture.
Apparently, the factors defining the economy lie outside the economy itself. There are some underwater parts of the icebergs, and the economy is engaged only in their small visible parts, because it really cannot predict anything. But where is the main influential mass, where the main intrigue occurs, which discards the shadow in the form of economic phenomena?

To understand the system, you often need to go beyond it. It is probably time to introduce a systematic view into the economy, that is, to talk about systems in themselves, in which communities live, states, in the business of which both the economy and all other aspects of human life falls. And here you can not do without a dialectical approach: you cannot consider the structure of human communities one -items, but only as a struggle of opposites, antagonism of systems and anti -systems.

What is the human system? This is a system of relations. Let's say a person’s personality is a system of relations. Family is also a system of relations. All these are subsystems of a large system of relations - culture. Moreover, culture is not a faceless system of relations, it has a basic support, a sample of relations is a unique, mobile system (scale) of values. Actually, “culture” can be deciphered as “the cultivation of values”. These values ​​are born from the specific living conditions of this culture, at the junction of man and nature, the development of production, interaction with neighboring cultures, that is, values ​​are due to functionality, benefit. The values ​​of a unique culture are known, except for real life, at first in fairy tales - the religion of children. Then, more complex examples of relations and values ​​are taught in an adult religion, literature, art ...

The opposite type of human self -organization is an antisystem . If the system is a coexistence in relations, then the antisystem is cohabitation in alienation. If the system is a culture, a system of relations based on a system of values, then the antisystem is an anti -culture united by general needs. If the culture system is always unique, no “universal values” exist (different systems are not added and not averaged), then anti-system-antics is universal, almost all needs-“universal”. If the system is functional and self -sufficient, then the antisystem is dysfunctional and parasitizes on systems.

A visual demonstration of the coexistence of the system and antisystems at the biological level is cancer. The body is a system, and a cancerous tumor is an antisystem parasitizing on it (see an article on the anti -system theory of cancer). How, during invasion, the same cells from cells of a healthy system turn into a cancer antisystem? They are alienated, come out of functional connections. The cancer cage seems to say healthy: “Look, I don’t do anything, I don’t bring any benefit, I have no duties, and I eat better than you! Throw a job, join the free! .. "

Exactly the same logic in antisystems of other levels. Say, at the state level of dysfunctional, parasitic, focused on the free antisystem, the empire (Art. "Camperocracy" - about the imperial structure of Russia). It also sterilizes the differences in the values ​​of many cultures (for example, in Russia - up to one and a half hundred) and instead of them “universal” needs are advanced forward. The dynamic variety of relations of cultures is replaced by a single static example of relations for the alienated (from culture) of persons - with non -intellectual relations of subordination, hierarchy, cholegia, reflected in the formula “I am a boss, you are a fool - I am a fool”, in fact - slavery . A single imperial “vertical of power” arises, which in the economic sense is the vertical of the seizure and distribution of freebies and nothing more. Therefore, let's say, all the Vertical Business Flags in the real sector suffer unchanged collapse. This does not exclude the effectiveness of the “vertical” in crisis, catastrophic situations, in the war. Therefore, the “vertical” for its self-preservation of the Force Majora itself provokes (for example, war-see the article “We lost in the Great Patriotic War” ).

Most likely, in the future, and the tendency is to that, in Russia there will be a dynamic state system, mobile, excluding provocation, inadequacy, destructiveness in the peaceful conditions of a static imperial antisystem. In a peaceful, calm, comfortable time, it will not be a “vertical”, but a confederate system according to the type of pre -imperial Kievan Rus, where every nation lived according to its “truth” - a law corresponding to the values ​​of its culture, its understanding of justice. Well, in force majeure situations, in catastrophic, pain points, the system will be transformed into a military-imperial, administrative-command “vertical of power”. Such a system once existed in the Pskov and Novgorod democracy-in peacetime, the rule of veche, democracy, and the prince was called to the military. That is why with such difficulty and later all the enslavement of the empire Pskov and Novgorod ( more about the dynamic system) took place.

The imperial antisystem in enslavement, colonization of new territories applies not only to military intervention, much more serious, economic and cultural intervention. For example, if it was not possible to defeat Chechnya in the war, then weapons are more powerful - a freebie. Moscow floods the republic and in general the Caucasus with money torn off from other colonized territories. The freebie destroys natural functional ties, useful economic activity and instead the same “vertical” arises for anything that are not capable of freebies, eager for handouts from above and paying a Kholuy devotion to the halavod.

It should be emphasized that economic anti -system intervention is only part of the general anti -cultural intervention designed to collaborate the local elite, destroy the local culture as a functional system of relations and a value system. To understand how this acts, it is useful to look at the fact that, say, any artists who have come into contact with the “vertical of power” are losing their talents. This demonstrates, say, the degradation of the talented director and actor N. Mikhalkov, who was pissing into the monster in behavior and creativity, which, under the amphor of the Russian government, turned into pseudo -creation, the racial metastase of culture under the amphor of the Russian government. If a normal director puts on a form of an idea, content, then N. Mikhalkov, like all representatives of imperial anti-culture, go the other way around-the content is adjusted to the pictures. Sometimes this molding is called “glamor”, “poppy”. Form (matter, mechanical vanity) is an antisystem’s horse, and content (idea, relationship) is the prerogative of the system ...

So, if at the biological and state, cultural levels we observe the confrontation of the system and antisystems, then why do theorists always try to present the economy one -time as one radiant economic system? The well -known quote is indicative in this sense, which K. Marx refers to its “capital”, where the systemic functional profit and antisystemic dysfunctional freebie refers to one vinaigrette and systemic functional profit: “Provide 10 percent, and capital agrees for all use, at 20 percent it becomes lively, with 50 percent, it is positively ready to break its head, with 100 percentage it breaks everything. Human laws, with 300 percent there is no such crime on which he would not risk, at least under pain of gallows ... "

This is how the qualitative difference (“breaking your head” and “committing a crime”) is translated into quantitative - the eternal effort of materialists who, by definition of quality that do not see and do not recognize the world - the world, their properties and laws, and therefore turning the basis and superstructure, cause and investigation - culture and economy. In fact, the same interest of profit can cause the completely opposite behavior of the capitalists. The point is precisely in the cultivation, that is, the functionality of the business, in a high -quality, essential, systemic, ideological characteristic, and not in numbers. A freebie gives rise to the destructiveness of all actors of the economy.

People since ancient times understood the destructiveness of freebies, and how they could hold it, for example, a struggle of religions with usury.

Islam prohibits the collection of interest (Riba), considering this one of the most grave sins: “And those who earned bread with their usury will stand from the graves similar to those whom Satan struck with madness, because they said:“ After all, the sale is akin to usure to usure. ” But Allah allowed the sale, and made the usury forbidden! .. " (Koran 2: 275) And further often, the same ban in other suras of the Qur'an.

Judaism, which prohibits both money in growth and occupying at interest, is also irreconcilable to usure. Chapter 65 of the book “Kitsur Shulkhan Arukh” (a set of laws of Judaism) says: “A loanist on interest violates the ban formulated in six different verses (Torah) and loses the resurrection from the dead, as it is said:“ He lended to debt, and will be a profit - and will come to life? Will not come to life! " The borrowing at interest violates the ban formulated in three different verses. ”

Today, such a struggle with freebies looks pretty sorry - modern methods of extracting freebies have become incomparably more diverse, captured all sectors of the economy, not only lending. Cancer is omnivorous. The freebie became an elusive werewolf. Even such a thing as the “real sector” does not save - it can also be planted on a free needle. And credit interest is not always destructive, but can work with a locomotive of really useful activities. So what then is the qualitative difference between the functional economy and dysfunctional, if we cannot clearly outline their sectors? And the difference is in the vector, direction - a procedural system characteristic. It is one thing when the body is cured and the tumor is reduced, the antisystem is reduced, or at least not increasing, cancer stands in place - “in situ”, and a completely different thing when the tumor metastasizes, takes more and more areas from the functional system of the body, until it exhausts and kills it.

This is the reason for economic crises: as soon as the anti -systemic freebits will grow to such sizes that the functional system economy can withstand it, it can no longer provide freebies, this is the case of a collapse. At first, a healthy part dies - a system that can no longer cope with the feeding of an anti -system parasite, which then dies itself. The economy begins from scratch, with real conditions. The construction of its functional sectors, the birth of a system, and the parallel development of a parasitic anti -system, striving to subjugate a functional economy to itself, transfer to a free orientation, that is, to destroy and turn into an antisystem, that is, again lead to a crisis. Hence the cyclicality of crises, the nature of which some economists can not understand, since they always try to build economic theory bypassing its dysfunctional part, avoiding touching free. Such economists do the same as if doctors began to study cancer, describing only a healthy organism and avoiding the tumor itself with all its properties.

A similar picture develops with the inability to understand economists with the nature of such a popular modern nightmare as stagflation , when a decrease in demand for some reason does not affect the increase in prices, when no economic laws work. Meanwhile, there is just an unbridled freebie - a roasting cancer tumor of the economy, which is no longer affected by any immune mechanisms of self -regulation. Economists are at a dead end when stagflation occurs, since stagnation and inflation are corrected by mutually exclusive actions (increase and reduction of money supply). If we understand the bissystemic nature of the economy, then it is clear how to get out of stagflation, as a self -proper bubble of halavonomics - to increase the functionality of the economy. This includes not only the actual economics of action, but also an ideology. If the authorities do not do this, then this will make a crisis ...

It is interesting that in the revelation of John the Theologian, the economy is represented in the image of a “great harlot” - one of the main defendants in the Apocalypse: “And the kings of the earthly in any activity with it, and the merchants of earthly rich from its great luxury.” (Rev. 18: 3) But how colorful in the Apocalypse is written about the collapse of the economy - “the great harlot”: “For that one day executions, death and crying and hunger will come to it, and will be burned with fire, because the Lord God, judging it ... and the kings of earthly, fornication and luxurious with it will be transferred about it. Her, when they see the smoke from the fire ... and the merits of the earth will succeed and pour out about it, because no one buys their goods ... For such wealth died in one hour! And all the helmsman, and all those who float on ships, and all shipwriters, and all trading in the sea became in the distance. ” (Rev. 18: 8-17)

The script of the crisis is the same for both the capitalist and the collapse of the socialist economy, which included the USSR. Attempts to reduce the reasons for the correctness of the market (western) and incorrectness of the planned (Soviet) economy are led to the side. There is nothing wrong with planning. It's all about free. All the formations of Russia as an empire, from the Golden Horde to the USSR and the Russian Federation - this is a change of forms of extraction of freebies after the next crisis caused by the fact that the previous freebie ended. The Soviet period of Russia began with the “expropriation of the improvisers” - “robbery of the loot”, military communism. Then the dispossession, inception of labor and the robbery of the property appointed by the “enemies of the people”, the enslavement of peasants in the form of collectivization, the alienation of the results of labor, the means of production in favor of the system, the command-administrative, which is actually the anti-system, gives freely freebie, and not functional manufacturers. A man was even alienated from his own desires, aspirations, talents - in the USSR, as a result, almost no one worked in the specialty received during his education ...

A logical result - the source of the freebie has dried up, the system had to provoke perestroika, reform, and the change of rhetoric. The “command and administrative system”, now already called the “vertical of power”, began to develop a new freebie, mainly oil-gas, and resource trade in the foreign market. And for the internal, even before, monetarism was chosen as the next Bolshevism (E.T. Gaidar - a hereditary conductor of this ideology), but with a lap in the form of money.

This in functional systems money is a stimulant, and in the conditions of the Russian antisystem it is a means of subordination, coercion, manipulation, management, control, in general - human enslavement. Наивно ожидать, что рынок сам отрегулирует и отсеет всё вредное. Это то же самое, что засадить поле пшеницей с бурьяном и ждать, что пшеница сама собой погубит сорняк и даст урожай. Естественно, что казино (бизнес халявы) всегда окажется в выигрыше в соревновании с шитьем ботинок. Святая вера монетаристов в то, что для разворачивания производства достаточно построить магазины, оказалась несостоятельной. Одни и те же факторы в условиях системы и в условиях антисистемы дают противоположный эффект. Монетаризм только добил остатки функциональной промышленности и сельского хозяйства, переориентировал страну на внешнего производителя, плоды труда которого и оказались в российских магазинах. Халява при помощи монетаризма метастазировала во все части организма России и вышла за ее пределы: теперь российская раковая опухоль паразитирует и на внешних здоровых экономиках, получая их продукты в обмен на отобранные у московских колоний природные ресурсы. Срок наступления неизбежного кризиса теперь зависит от того, сколько выдержат здоровые функциональные мировые экономики не только своих, но и российского паразита.

Рыночники и монетаристы совершенно слепо верят в то, что если дать зеленую улицу паразиту, то он вынужден будет растить и развивать организм, на котором паразитирует, и превратится в «эффективного менеджера». This is far from the case. Паразит-халявщик принадлежит к другой системе (антисистеме) и мышление, поведение унего совсем другое, нежели диктует функциональная логика. Откачав максимум халявы в одном месте, он не будет заморачиваться восстановлением иссякнувшего источника халявы, а уйдет искать другой, благо в мире здоровых организмов хватает.

Многие не могут понять: откуда такой парадокс — обнищание населения и на этом фоне рекордный рост числа российских миллиардеров? На самом деле никакого парадокса тут нет: раковая опухоль может разрастись до громадных размеров, и чем больше она, тем слабее и истощенннее организм, на котором она паразитирует. Эту российскую «противофазу» заметил еще В.О.Ключевский: «Государство пухло, народ хирел...» Чем больше халявы — тем больше халявщиков. Чем больше халявщиков — тем сильнее грабёж функционального производителя. В итоге, чем богаче государство — тем беднее народ в России.

Показателен казус, что основным показателем эффективности работы различных структур, что в СССР, что в рыночной России остается количество «освоенных средств», т. е. способность переварить халяву. В функциональной экономике не так — эффективность означает эконономию средств, а не их трату. В антисистеме всё наоборот: что хорошо — то плохо, что плохо — то хорошо.

Если прорехи в функционально необходимых секторах плановой экономики СССР затыкались студенческими стройотрядами, шумными пропагандистскими кампаниями с целью привлечения легковерных, принудительным трудом заключенных, десантами инженеров и ученых на картошку в колхозы и овощебазы, то в рыночной России, где главным регулятором являются деньги, эти сектора занимают иммигранты. Суть дисфункциональной антисистемы не изменилась, она с еще большим успехом адаптировалась к новым условиям.

И где теперь рассуждения о соревновании плановой и рыночной экономик? Россия еще быстрее приведет к краху и рынок, поскольку определяющим фактором российской экономики является одна и та же неизменная халява — наивысшая ценность антисистемы. Закон антисистемы: любая халява рано или поздно заканчивается. Но в антисистеме кризис — это не беда, а скорее благо. Она кризис (катастрофу, голод, войну) провоцирует, она же его и утилизует на свою пользу, как спровоцированный такой же антисистемой кризис 1933 г. в Германии, привел к запредельному укреплению и беснованию антисистемы — фашизму .

И в России сейчас к такому сценарию всё готово. Общество проходит фазу отчуждения — распада всех систем отношений (культуры) и становления вместо них антисистемы — пирамиды, иерархии, «вертикали власти» в которую аффилируются все ветви власти, все политики (в том числе «оппозиционные» — их «оппозиционность» формальна, не затрагивает саму систему), бизнес, СМИ, церкви, искусство, наука. Что бы ни делала «пирамида» — она неизбежно сформирует кризис, просто ввиду своей неадекватности и халяво-ориентированности. Возможно, кризис будет с такой же угрозой голода, как в Германии и СССР 1933 года, и результат будет тот же — народ, запуганный голодом, припадет к ногам очередного фюрера и даст ему карт-бланш на мобилизационную экономику и репрессии, как средство обеспечения этой экономики средствами и дешевой рабочей силой. Вот тут-то «пирамида», будучи милитаристским порождением, станет адекватна — мобилизация ее стихия. Будут опять «успехи первых пятилеток», но на них долго не продержаться, нужна новая мобилизация, и ее даст опять провокация большой войны.

Кстати, объяснение того, что война является универсальным выходом из кризиса: она просто утилизует, приспосабливает разбушевавшуюся антисистему, делает ее адекватной и эффективной.

Кто будет на этот раз «вероломным» врагом? Вероятнее всего, такая же империя, в которой правит антисистема — Китай, которому Россия сейчас относится чрезывычайно трепетно, как когда-то к гитлеровской Германии, стараясь холить и лелеять будущего благословенного врага и не допустить ни одного преждевременного мелочного скандала.

Любая антисистема ходит по кругу между крахами и взлетами. В Китае эта цикличность отчетливо видна на протяжении тысячелетий: хаос «воюющих царств» — «малое процветание» государства — «великое единение» метрополии империи и периферии — опять крах и хаос. Сейчас Китай в стадии «малого процветания», причем упор делается на сохранение культурной идентичности — раковая опухоль чует, как надо сохранить функциональный организм. Функциональность экономики определяет именно культура. Если антисистемную дисфункциональную часть экономики мы называть халявономикой, то системную функциональную экономику можно назвать культурономикой. В этом смысле Китай значительно впереди России, почти полностью выполовшей в XX веке культуры, особенно русскую, и, в связи с удачной разработкой новой халявы, к культуре так и не развернувшейся. Именно это обеспечит Китаю победу в войне с Россией. Теперь Россия будет в роли фашистской Германии, что обеспечит в будущем россиским народам процветание, как процветают немцы, освободившиеся от своего рейха семьюдесятью годами раньше таким же формальным «поражением». Ведь в антисистеме всё наоборот: что хорошо — то плохо, что плохо — то хорошо.

Так и закончится очередной круг фашизма — прощального, как в Германии, взлета антисистемы. А дальше всё сначала — строительство новой, уже системной, естественной, функциональной экономики, на основе динамической, неимперской государственной системы , опирающееся на культуры, на их уникальные системы ценностей. Какая она будет – рыночной, плановой или смешанной многоукладной – это абсолютно не важно. Любая экономика в условиях функциональной системы получится и заживёт благополучно…

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

В качестве художественной иллюстрации фильм «Миллион для чайников»:

Заставляют деградировать людей не деньги, а халява...

Original