Return Taganrog

Boris Sokolov, 06/29/2015

From the magazine "Branch".

The Prosecutor General’s Office recognized the unconstitutional transfer of Crimea from the RSFSR to Ukraine in 1954. It is funny that the prosecutors took up the verification of the constitutionality of legal acts adopted several decades ago in the state no longer existing today. In addition, in fact, the issues of compliance with the regulatory acts of the Constitution are resolved by us, as if not a prosecutor’s office, but a constitutional court. However, it would not be a matter for him: if they order, he recognizes anything appropriate or not corresponding to the constitution, at least the sale of Alaska America.

But even if the decision was made by the Constitutional Court, it would have no more relation to international law than the current decision of the Prosecutor General. After all, the belonging of Crimea to Ukraine was unconditionally recognized in a number of agreements between Russia and Ukraine, in particular, in the friendship, cooperation and partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine in 1997 and in the agreement concluded in the same year on the status and conditions of the stay of the Black Sea Fleet of Russia in Ukraine.

That part of the decision of the Prosecutor General’s Office, which claims that after the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine, Sevastopol retained the status of a city of union subordination, is refuted elementary - by a simple appeal to the corresponding to the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. It says black and white there that Sevastopol has the status of a city of republican subordination in the Ukrainian SSR.

The Prosecutor General’s Office also believes that the Constitution of the USSR of 1936 “The issues of approving the changes in borders between the Union republics attributed to the jurisdiction of the USSR in the person of its highest bodies of state power and government bodies and did not provide for the powers of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on changing the territories of the Union republics.” Accordingly, such powers did not seem to have the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR. And therefore, they say, decrees of the Presidiums of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR and the Supreme Council of the RSFSR on the transfer of the Crimean region from Russia to Ukraine are unconstitutional.

However, otherwise, by the decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR (and earlier, while the Constitution of the USSR was in force, the decrees of the Presidium of the CEC of the USSR) were not made by changes in borders between the republics. Although the 1924 Constitution also attributed such actions to the exceptional leadership of the Union CEC. Another thing is that all decisions of the Presidium of the CEC and decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Council were mandatory approved by the next sessions of the CEC and the Supreme Council. However, the Prosecutor General’s Office preferred not to pay attention to this circumstance.

Meanwhile, for example, by the Decree of the Presidium of the CEC of the USSR of October 16, 1925, a number of regions of the Taganrog and Shakhty districts with the cities of Taganrog and Mine were transferred from Ukraine. In return, Ukraine received a number of territories of the Pochep and Sevsky districts of the Bryansk province, Putivl district (with Putillem) and units of the Gravoron, Belgorod and Sudzhansky districts of the Kursk province, as well as part of the Valuysky district of the Voronezh province. If you follow the logic of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office, it is also necessary to cancel the corresponding CEC resolution and return to the borders that existed until October 16, 1925. But then Russia will definitely lose. She will have to return the mines with 237 thousand people and Taganrog with 253 thousand people, having received back in only 17 thousand inhabitants.

In the same way, almost all changes in the territories of the Union republics carried out in Soviet times will have to be recognized as illegal. For example, on the same basis as the transfer of Crimea to Ukraine, we can recognize the transformation of the Kazakh Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic into the Allied Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic and its exit from the RSFSR. This was done by the simple adoption of the new Constitution of the USSR on December 5, 1936, but no decisions of the CEC of the USSR and the RSFSR on the withdrawal of Kazakhstan from the Russian Federation were previously accepted.

Or here is the COLLECTION between the Soviet Union and Iran on the settlement of border and financial issues, concluded on December 2, 1954 and ratified by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on April 25, 1955. According to this agreement, Iran refused claims to the Firuz area, which was part of the Soviet Turkmenistan, and in return received the territory of Soviet Azerbaijan equal in area. If we recognize the change in the borders of Azerbaijan illegal by this decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Council, then a territorial dispute may arise between Iran and Azerbaijan.

The application of the principles used by the Russian Prosecutor General in the decision on the Crimea to other legal acts related to the change in borders between the Union republics can lead to this geographical chaos in the post -Soviet space. But Putin is quite happy with this. He, like an experienced shuler, has another trump card in his sleeve. Parliamentarians from United Russia turned to the Prosecutor General’s Office with a request to verify the legality of the creation of the USSR State Council in 1991, which recognized the independence of the Baltic countries. There is no doubt that, if necessary, the Prosecutor General’s Office will declare the State Council an illegitimate body at the right time, and therefore the recognition of the independence of the Baltic states will be considered illegal. And the Kremlin will receive the pretext "to meet the aspirations of the Russian -speaking population" and start a hybrid war against Latvia or Estonia.

Of course, all exercises of the Prosecutor General’s Office with the Crimea, and in the future, are not excluded, and with other territories of the post -Soviet states are propaganda in nature and are intended primarily for the use of within the country. However, they are also addressed to “useful idiots” in the West who will repeat that since the Soviet Union was not quite legitimate, then Putin’s politics has its own reasons. And, even more dangerous, decisions of this kind can serve as a pretext for new Russian aggression not only against Ukraine, but also against other post -Soviet states.

Infection from Israel

A couple of phrases (on a pair of phrases ) 06/30/2015

I consider the political practice of the state of Israel the extreme right, covered by the values of democracy, and in fact based on the ideology of racial and religious superiority, xenophobia and hatred of neighboring and other nations.
Israel is closely connected with the information, political and economic spaces of the Russian Federation.
The ideas of xenophobia, racism, radical nationalism, usual for Israeli society ... are translated into Russia, destroying and destroying its federal and democratic structure.
Therefore, the struggle against fascism in Israel and Palestine is a struggle against fascism in Russia.

Maxim Shevchenko, journalist, member of the Human Rights Council

Zionism proves to the right and left that if the Jews manage to form an independent state in Palestine, then this will be all that Jews need as a nation. But in reality, this is only a impudent lies, again aimed at deceiving stupid "goy". The Jewish state in Palestine does not need Jews at all in order to really live there, but only in order to create a well -known independent base there, not subordinate to any control of other states, so that from there it was possible to continue the policy of world fraud even more unclear. Palestine should become a shelter for a particularly important group of villains and university for younger scammers.

Adolf Hitler. " My struggle "

SHOS and SOS

A pair of phrases (on a pair of phrases ) 06/29/2015

Russian foreign policy enters into a new, Eurasian period of its development. In order for this period to become a history of success, we must be attentive to existing formats of international cooperation in the region ... And most importantly, to understand from which bricks we can build what has already received the name "Eurasia of General Fate" in official statements.
July 8-10 in Ufa will be a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) ...

Timofey Bordachev, political scientist, director of the Eurasian program MDK "Valdai"

They began to discuss a plan for the quick creation of a mass party. There are a lot of supporters of common fate on the island in all segments of the population ... There is no doubt that when SOS arises - this is the abbreviation, the union of common fate, it sounds magnetically, her, this word is already the key to success, so when SOS arises, other parties will thin. It is necessary to declare a new batch as soon as possible and do it with an open shot.

Vasily Aksenov. " Island of Crimea "