Evolution of evolution

I am dual with the theory of evolution. More precisely, to its famous expositions known to me. On the one hand, the most runaway analysis leads me to the idea that this is no science.

In fact: the prognostic power of theory is zero (even it is not clear what the theory of evolution could predict). The ability to check the theory with an experiment is zero. After all, the theory of evolution operates with processes last millions of years, that is, lying outside of any experiment. Even the criterion of verification (this criterion requires that the theory could be refuted in any way, if it is even hypothetically impossible, then the theory is recognized as unbelief and unscientific) - the theory of evolution does not satisfy. At least I cannot come up with an experiment that refutes the theory of evolution.

In addition, the theory of evolution is contrary to the second law of thermodynamics (on the increase in entropy).

The methods of polemics of most adherents of evolutionism also repel rather. In intolerant, without the slightest ability to self -criticism or irony.

Despite all this, I cannot discard this theory to the landfill, to consider it something like the "theory of phlogiston" or other numerous scientific failures. Why? Because she is beautiful. The idea that from the homogeneous "something" (the world of amoeb) the whole of our heterogeneous natural world has formed (I do not touch the origin of man now) - is so fresh and unexpected that it is fascinating. Even if in fact, nothing of the kind on Earth happened. Suddenly, you can create such an environment for amoebas that they will begin to differentiate and gradually grow feathers, fins, fingers ... Biological species will arise with stable chromosomes. Suddenly, some complex system of positive and negative feedback can give a similar result?

As I already wrote, an experiment can hardly be done.

Original