Civil Society

He returned from the lecture of Peter Ryabov about sovereign myths and propaganda. He was satisfied: the protruding was least resembled the agitator (to see the agitator by the famous dream book - to a headache). Soft, intelligent, he tried to help the listeners to develop his own critical position, pointed out orientes independent of state propaganda for moral judgments.

It was pleasant to be in the circle of thinking people, and the spirit of sectarianism was felt among young anarchists less than at many liberal events.

However, Peter Ryabov himself, a history teacher at a Moscow university is no longer young, rather my peer.

Personally, I learned a little new from the content of his speech. After all, in the late 70s I read samizdat, a teenager carried him with suitcases to Syktyvkar and vice versa. Then much was printed in the light, in the 80s.

What took more than 20 years? To the gradual return of Chervonopisky (there was such a deputy who scolded Sakharov at the congress during it). In my replica after Ryabov’s performance, I touched this.

I am glad to get acquainted with an interesting lecturer and author of books, consecrating the topics of anarchism. It was nice to see the audience: they were people who realized that they were not only spectators of the performance that history gives us.

Original