This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

The impossibility of discussion

Igor Yakovenko: Their goals are to promote the “spiral of silence”, create the appearance of 86% of Putin’s support, destroy the space of dialogue

Update: 05/22/2015 (03:12)

From the site "Kasparov.ru".

The title of the first chapter of the great Bulgakov novel: “Never talk with unknown”, it would be worth including social networks in a memo for a novice user, which would help a newcomer to preserve a fair amount of health, nerves and faith in people. Since the situation today is such that with the probability of 90%, this unknown will be a bot, grown in the Olgino Laboratory, on the outskirts of St. Petersburg, where hundreds of young people, clogging each other, are scribbled by tens of thousands of posts and comments on alien posts, glorifying Putin, scolding Poroshenko and accusing Obama of all the troubles of humanity.
The main goal is to promote the “spiral of silence”, to create this visibility of 86% of Putin’s support, which will then be stamped by VTsIOM, giving this imaginary unanimity the status of a “scientific fact”.
Another, no less important goal is to destroy the space of dialogue in the Russian -speaking world, to discourage the hunt to enter into discussion, to constantly interfere with people to talk. The Olginsky bots solve these problems on the network, and on the body, this function takes on shouts like Solovyov, Tolstoy and Norkin, who put on the stream the production of pseudo-discussias, in which one or two sincere people trying to think on the air against the packs of etheric bots. An experienced showman immediately sees a clown cap on such a sincere person, and pointing at him with a finger, GOD: "No, you look at this clown - he came to think on the air - found a place!".
However, in the Russian TV there is an experimental platform on which the forces of people and bots are almost equalized. In the program of Valery Fadeev, the "structure of the moment", which comes out on Channel One, sometimes three bots are released against three people. “Almost” is equal because the host always plays on the side of the bots. But, despite this relative equality of forces, the discussion is still impossible, since the bots are incapable of it, since they are programmed to destroy the discussion, and not on its conduct.
In the "structure of the moment" from 05/19/2015, people were journalist Stanislav Kucher, Deputy Director of INION Tatyana Parkhalina and American journalist Michael Bom. The BOTS team has a communist State Duma deputy Leonid Kalashnikov, PR and political strategist Konstantin Kostin and State Duma deputy Leonid Slutsky. They talked, of course, about the United States (they discussed what it suddenly came to Kerry and Nuland) and about Ukraine (Poroshenko was constantly hiccuping).
Fadeev set the tone for the conversation by calling Victoria Nuland a lover of Muchny. From the bots team, the first to attack, as befits the Communists, deputy Kalashnikov. He explained that America understood his failure, saw that the whole world supports Russia and, afraid to stay away, came to the center of adoption of world decisions, that is, to Russia. Having praised the United States for quick wits, the communist deputy Kalashnikov was immediately indignant at Poroshenko’s behavior, who was sitting in the Norman four (here the deputy Kalashnikov folded his hands on the table and gave his face a stupid expression, showing how outrageously, stupidly and hypocritically the president of Ukraine sits in this very Norman four) while he should negotiate with the leaders with the leaders "DPR" and "LPR".
In order for President Poroshenko to be equal to someone, the communist deputy Kalashnikov brought as an example of Azerbaijan President Heydar Aliyev, who did not hesitate to enter into negotiations with the rebellious opposition, and the result of these negotiations, as Kalashnikov explained, the rebellious opposition was disarmed, and then generally liquidated.
It is strange that the deputy Kalashnikov sent the president of Ukraine to adopt the distant Azerbaijani experience when there are more than enough of their experience with the separatists in Russia. The presidents of Chechnya Johar Dudaev and Aslan Maskhadov could tell a lot about this diplomatic negotiation art if each of them had not been destroyed during very long diplomatic negotiations.
If the main speaker was the deputy Kalashnikov from the bots, then on the other hand the burden of leadership was taken by journalist Stanislav Kucher, who, unlike opponents, tried to think on the air all the time. And since thinking is a rather troublesome and long process, despite the good Russian oral, professional TV presenter Stanislav Kucher could not argue his opponents who constantly threw short shock phrases from the manuals into it.
Journalist Kucher is trying to formulate his position, recalling how he opposed the cumulative worship of the United States in the early 90s in Komsomolskaya Pravda, and now he is opposed to the United States to consider the main evil on Earth. “America is not a single Kremlin tower,” Stanislav Kucher continues to think on the air, and asks the question - “Why are we talking and thinking about America all the time, how should we say and think about ourselves, how is the same America? Why are we looking for all the time of an external enemy?”
In response to the thoughts of the coachman, addressed to the left hemisphere of the brain of viewers, to where the logic should houses, Kalashnikov’s restless response in the right hemisphere, including emotions and images: “We tried to win us for thousands of years, so we always opposed external aggression, and ourselves did not attack anyone.” In the television show, it is impossible to go into a historical excursion and explain how it turned out that an ever -humble and non -exciting Russia became the owner of the largest territory in the world. Therefore, in this exchange of replicas, the word remains with the team of bots.
A person who thinks outwardly always loses the bot, as a person trying to play checkers will certainly lose to an opponent who plays the same board in Chapaeva. A thoughtful person is trying to look for the truth, so he is not always sure of his innocence and ask questions more. The bot has ready -made answers to all questions, since he is looking not for these answers in real life, where these answers are as a result of a painful search, but in the manual, where these answers are formulated briefly and clearly.
Journalist Kucher wonders why, if the truth on our side and the interests of the Ukrainian people are defended by Russia, and not the USA and Europe, why in this case our special services and our diplomacy could not replay the special services and diplomacy of the West and lost their influence on Ukraine.
In response from the bots team, an instant quote from the manual, voiced by a political strategist Kostin, arrives: "because I have no habit of twisting hands and get into other people's affairs." Since even the simple enumeration of the peoples, which our country has only “twisted hands” and the transfer of countries in whose affairs our country “climbed” would take time, would take the time comparable to the duration of the entire program, apparently, therefore, this quote from the methodica remained unanswered, which could quite make the impression that bots and people again win the bots.
The bot is never mistaken, since everything that he says is outside the logic and does not correlate in reality. A thoughtful person is mistaken regularly and often speaks strange and amazing things. The same journalist Stanislav Kucher, who was constantly trying to think on the air, shared his thoughts about the multipolar world that would, in his opinion, would be correct and useful for humanity. In this world, according to Stanislav Kucher, there should be three poles: the USA, China and Russia as a leader of the United Europe. If the journalist Kucher added that this is the world of his patriotic dream, then this outlandish design would become clear. Since it was not about an imaginary city of Kitezh, but about reality, the hypothesis that Russia should be headed by Europe looks approximately the same as possible how the perspective of the journalist Stanislav Kuchera is likely to the papal throne.
During the transfer, there was a moment when it seemed that the journalist Kucher managed to create a real space of discussion. When he was able to impose a conversation not about how terrible the United States is and how bad Poroshenko, but about what Russia should have done to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. But it was precisely a moment, since the bots quickly recovered and began to quote manuals again, and Vladimir Solovyov suddenly woke up in the leading Valeria Fadeev and said that “we have very good tanks and missiles, and they are a guarantee of the resolving Ukrainian conflict.
After these words, it became clear that there was nothing to discuss about, since the discussion is a place for the search for truth, or at worst, the place of publication of their opinion, and for bots this is a special operation in which bots, that is, soldiers of information troops, coordinate their actions with tankers and rackets. What kind of discussion can be here.