Why rewrite the population?

Blogger Fritz Moiseevich Morgen, on the eve of the All -Russian census of the population, was puzzled by the question of its need and addressed him to his readers. In the comments, they discussed the opportunity not to discover the door to the scenes, not to declare existing children, to come up with a nationality, religion and hide sexual orientation.

Slowly, I got to us on October 14. In Russia, the census of the population begins. Millions of doors are reluctant to open to let state spies: scribes. How the official website of the census scares us, "everyone is important for Russia."

It would seem: what is so terrible here? Causions are not sorcerers? In the Antidogma community, for example, such soothing words (source) write:

“If you sincerely believe that your data is going to be used against you, you are flattering yourself. Personally, your data, with a binding on your last name, name, patronymic, no one needs. Rosstat requires generalized, quantitative statistics. In other words, the state does not give a damn how much money, Ivan Petrovich receives Sidorov (for example), with whom he sleeps and where he lives. The state is about how many people work for hiring, how many people hold their business, how many people live in a particular region, how many people have good living conditions, and how many are bad. There is no matter to your royal person separately. Enough to suffer from paranoia and mania greatness, my friends. ”

Tell me, why don't I trust these soothing words, even though the agitator calls me a “friend”? Maybe because I received a very curious letter from one of my readers, in which he talks about a real census? I will quote a piece:

“... I am worried about the upcoming census of the population. And that's why. The fact is that I took part in the 2002 census as a scribe, and later communicated with systems from the State Statistics Service and have an idea of ​​how the data is processed.

My specialization engineer-mathematician. I can responsibly say that statistics with details are more accurate than the city (in districts, districts) obviously incorrect (if it is interesting, I can write about it separately, but I will return to the reasons).

The nature of the data collection does not imply their anonymity. Moreover, the local administration is very actively interested in both the information collected and its falsification in a profitable key to itself.

For example, a friend from the administration was constantly spinning at our collection point. He confidentially told us that money is allocated for every person from the hunchback for a variety of holidays, repairs, etc. And the administration is not at all interested in the small number of rewritten. Since our engineering soul is not able to come up with a couple of hundreds of profiles, it was sent at a well -known address. But it appeared later, with the lists of passport data of people who, from his words, live in apartments and hide from the census. He offered to make a questionnaire on them. Our audit (we were still altruist students) showed that these are just guests, who were the Muscovites, which Muscovites registered at home.

We also found one apartment, whose socially active mistress did not know what kind of people they were. Having copied our list, she said that she would write a statement to the prosecutor's office (hello to the registration trade). ”

In short, if it is possible to use an administrative resource for a noise for their own purposes - officials will definitely use it. For example, the census results can be useful to identify children who live not at the address of registration. I will say more. I will never be surprised if in some regions scribes directly ask to pay attention to dysfunctional families with children ...

Do you think I'm paranoid?

May be. However, sorry, official bases of officials are easily accessible to all curious. For example, in a slanderous article about me on Lurkmore for public display, my home address, taken from some state base, was brazenly posted. I would show an extreme degree of naivety if I seriously relied on the secret of the census.

Therefore, colleagues, I propose to think a little how we can reduce the danger from the census to zero. The opinion of the scribes is especially interesting: please write what instructions give you, what unusual wishes officials say. Be sure to indicate the city/region.

And for now, I will give a few tips from the same experienced scribble for seeding:

1. Capes on the phone or take a walk to the point yourself.

2. A good idea is to “forget” to indicate the child.

3. If you correspond to at home, then the child is just a nephew visiting. Excessively curious scribes can be explained that the child will certainly be rewritten. Only at his house.

I look forward to in the comments of new ideas/advice/tricks.

PS in the questionnaire I am going to indicate nationality as Hikki. Do not ask why.

Source: Newsland