
Excuse me, soar. Yesterday I read the scream of the soul of responsible parents.
They have three children. They are a family that can be considered the future of the country. I do not end, so the president said that such families are the future. They educate and grow children in the best traditions of the Russian and Russian intelligentsia - circles, additional classes, art schools, sections, all that.
And this family is outraged: only more than 12 thousand rubles are spent per month for the school of art, and the benefit as poor is half the minimum subsistence minimum for the child. Not even three quarters, but only half is appointed.
And they ask them how to live when they have a mortgage (necessary), a loan on a car (a car also needs), children need to relax, children need fruits - they need clothes - they need to study, children need a cultural program - they need money, and the state gives money with Gulkin ... Nose. Well, or the cat cried.
Honestly, I always protect large families. Because most of those that I know personally are people who plow (some - in the literal sense of the word) from dawn to dawn. They do not receive any benefits, since white income has very impressive, do not cry that they are “not enough”, and the children “need”, they simply work. Because children are exclusively their decision, and not their contribution for the benefit of demography and development of the state, which the state is obliged to immediately compensate for them.
But here it turned out that to protect ... No way.
Although you can add: there are a lot of such families not only among large, but also among “single -child” parents. There are especially many in Zen. What are the authors, what is in the comments.
Having tightened the aria “give me, give me”, they poke their parenthood in the nose, demand that “the government turn to face them” and “to pay normal benefits.” The suggestions to moderate the requirements - answer:
- This may be enough for you, but we need to. - Then there is a list of what is needed.
And, in principle, in the “necessary” - quite adequate Wishlist. Good food, clothes, education.
- Why should we refuse this to our children? - Ask.
Yes, they should not refuse that you. No one should deny anything at all. Just in order not to refuse, you need to earn money for this, and not sing "give me, give it." Even if children are the future, when they talk about it, do not imply that those who give birth to children will be kept in full.
And from where the equality of such concepts as “state support” and “life is completely at the expense of the state” came from in their heads.
And you?