Do you have a plan, M. Kats?

This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.

Many probably looked at the debate between Maxim Katsa and Michael Naki. But both counterparts proceed from the fact that in the "elections" in Russia it is necessary to take part.

Briefly the content of the debate themselves.

Maxim Katz, apparently realizing that this time the FBK tactics will be the same as always - UG, which, in turn, will consist of support for quasiliberal, quasi -optical or damage to the ballot. Therefore, Katz decided to speak first in order to give a little on this.

The main theses of the debaters:

Katz: "I have a plan. Which one? We will develop later."

Naki: "No need to write FBK*. They themselves know what to do!"

This is the meaning of all the debate. If Katz has the main dogma - participation in the elections. That’s from Naki too. One difference, FBK will decide how to vote, later. The debates resembled the conversation of two deaf-blond people.

If we take the "elections" of the president, then not a single "elections" in modern Russia went honestly. We give examples from recent history.

"Elections 2000". The main favorite refused to take part in the election campaign - Evgeny Primakov, who was defeated by the Duma "elections" a couple of months before in the Duma "elections" with the help of omnipotent guest -evidence.

No one will ever prove to me that Vova won with 2% of the rating in 2000, not to appear at the election debate. However, his patron, Yeltsin, also never went to the election debate. Why do this when you manage all television in the country?

"Elections of 2004". Putin still does not go to the debate. All the media under the control of one Putin. Parties are sent as sparring partners of second persons. Everyone pretends to see that they do not see how the main competitors do not provide premises for meetings with voters, and if they are provided, they turn off the light. There are reports of some violations:

"... a serious problem noted at last year's meeting was the actions of members of a number of election commissions in the city of Moscow, containing signs of a criminal act. The prosecutor's office, based on the results of the investigation, opened a criminal case on the grounds of the crime under Article 142 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (falsification of voting results). During the investigation, it was established that the data of the combined tables of two territorial election commissions did not correspond to The first copies of the protocols of the precinct election commissions for 10 polling stations .

This is only a small part of the violations. And how many of them were all over Russia? History is silent, but it is clear that it is everywhere, since political parties, if they directed observers, did not charge them to detect falsifications.

In such conditions, Putin already receives 70% of the vote.

"Elections-2008". The year when Putin appointed Dmitry Medvedev in his place. Mikhail Kasyanov, Harry Kasparov, Vladimir Bukovsky, Boris Nemtsov, Oleg Shenin and others were not allowed to all other violations for the “elections”, and others.

"Elections-2012". Is it necessary to tell with what squat of the recorded violations this election campaign passed! Fixation of violations contributed to the widespread spread of cell phones, the Internet and social networks.

"Elections-2018". As usual with a familiar set of violations. Alexei Navalny was not allowed for the "Elections".

The author deliberately avoids the description of the violations and falsifications. Because they are well -known, and if desired, examples can be found on the Internet.

I don’t understand why Putin’s special operation to reorganize Putin? Why are we again forced to participate in falsifications?

It is significant that Putin drives to participate in the "elections" of state employees, students, military, etc. The drovers do not even ask to vote "for Putin." The falsification system is so debugged that it is not important for a long time who you have your vote for! Specially trained people will do as they should and how much they need!

It is significant that the authorities are driving to the "elections". And then Katz! Why is such a unanimity? It is important for Putin to tie people with complicity in the electoral special operation: voted, well, tolerate! So that there are no questions for the results of the "elections": "Everyone went to vote, then everyone is to blame!"

I would pay attention to the fact that in Soviet times the most terrible horror for the party celebration was: "We will not go to vote!" And then the officials found out: "What do you deign? What are the problems?"

According to the latest changes in electoral legislation, it is not necessary to demonstrate marks in ballots to observers. Only members of commissions with a decisive vote (ChRG) can check, recalculate the ballots. But parliamentary parties intentionally direct non -andal christening. With doubting ChRG, they carry out multi -level work, they are bought, intimidated, methodically looking for vulnerable places for five years. And if one of the observers is ready to show fundamentalness, honesty, they are handed the summons in the army .

Are those who call people to "elections" are ready to be responsible? Are you ready to help the victims when observing the "election"?

Most of those who call for "elections" do not even imagine what they are today! Through what pressure, bullying and temptation, the observer in the "election" has to go. If a non -fed honest observer is not seduced by kefir , then the shakuins who will be rubbed with their genitals can be exposed to the calculation. The police can easily pull out a responsible observer from the polling station as your rebellious servant on March 4, 2012.

Those who call for the "elections" should not be driven with your hand in the election headquarters, but be sure to go to the polling station and stay on the calculation. So I always did, even having in my hands, the certificate of the candidate of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, and remained in the most led area.

Of well -known politicians, there were so many units. Even Ksenia Sobchak, who is very criticized today, caught the hand of falsifiers in the 2012 presidential election. No matter how bad we relate to her, but this act of her causes me respect.

Dmitry Gudkov was not allowed to observe .

And all! I could no longer remember which of the famous politicians with a personal example showed us how to watch the "elections" correctly.

I have a question: if nothing prevents falsifiers from the candidates for many years, then what will prevent them from stealing spoiled ballots? What prevents them from shifting damaged ballots into a pack to Putin?

The spoiled ballots in the same way as everyone else is transferred to the pack to the ballots for Putin!

In addition, falsifiers are inventive people, in the “election” -2022 for the spoiled ballot was fined the voter . Who will be responsible and help the voter who spoiled the ballot and received a fine, arrest, agenda at the military registration and enlistment office?

I would still perceive the action with understanding if they were called to vote for a single opposition candidate, observe with all responsibility, then count all the ballots. And if they are not allowed to double -check, take control of all the tick in the country. But, unfortunately, even Maxim Katz fearfully calls his actions: "So that Putin is no longer president."

To take part in the "elections" of modern Russia is to legitimize them.

They tell us: "But you only want to sit on the couch!"

It is better to sit on the couch than help the enemy!

* The material mentioned the organization of the Corruption Fund, whose activity is prohibited in the Russian Federation