
This is a personal blog. The text could be written in the interests of the author or third parties. The 7x7 editors are not involved in its creation and may not share the author’s opinion. The registration of blogs on 7x7 is open for authors of various views.
I watched here the news of Russian television channels. This is a straight holiday of campaigns and some kind of sacrifice. It seems that our official information channels are some ancient deities, reveling in human deaths. In general, a well -known fact - the more corpses, the more views - Tanatos attracts human attention even stronger than Eros. But Tanaos not only attracts attention, he dulls him. It is one thing when they show a tragedy with a sunken ferry, it is simply sorry for people. Another thing is when they show the burned house of trade unions, simultaneously answering the damned Russian questions: who is to blame and what to do. “Listen to me, Banderalogs,” as if the native zombie addresses the audience.
However, there is one more question that we know from all detectives - who is beneficial? Russian official media, if they make attempts to answer, then attract these answers by the ears. And these ears stick out from all sides. True, as I already said, when the attention of the looking and listener is paralyzed by a demonstration of corpses and stories about how brutally killed people, no longer thought, solid emotions.
Our official media are valiantly and selflessly boiling the Ukrainian authorities from all sides, from which they can. And the audience watches in enjoyed. There is a simple thing: when it comes to total captivation, and nothing else our news channels will seem to us, there can be no talk of objectivity, just no, and when we needed our official media, well, remember it yourself. At the same time, I would like to threw up with my hands from tenderness when these hares (remember about ears sticking out from everywhere) from blue television screens and on a blue eye they talk about how the Western and Ukrainian mass media “lie” and in general everything except ours. Come on, guys, how is your log in your eye?
Well, one at least the moment, completely obvious. For example, I clearly understand that there were almost no Odessa residents in the tent town of anti -Maidan. Well, this is illogical - to live in a tent in the square in the city where you have an apartment. It’s easier in the morning to get up, wash and come. However, not for our official media. They probably are easier to put on their pants over their heads.
Now let's go back to the question "who is beneficial?" Who benefits from corpses and victims beneficial? Those who want to ensure that the troops or to the one who input the troops had already asked for this two months ago in any case?
I, unlike our official media, I don’t know who actually organized riots in Odessa. And I can’t even say that the organizers had the unrest, although, I think, there were - to shoot from a firearm in a crowd of football fans - this is a frank provocation.
I do not ask you difficult questions "Who is to blame?" And "what to do?" As you know, the answers to these questions are not simple and require a long investigation (but not for official Russian media, of course!) How do you answer for yourself the question "who is beneficial?"
UPD: the necessary addition. The other day, my friend, once again, said the news, said: "Troops there [in Ukraine] must be entered." And this was softly said, after all, more stringent calls are heard - to come and put things in order with an “iron hand”, that is, to throw our media more corpses. Use of hatred.
And to make it clear: a couple of weeks ago, when I was going to go to Kyiv, I informed my friends and acquaintances, about a future trip. Those who are looking at the zombie asked if I were scared. Those who prefer to find and filter information on their own, said: class! There now chestnuts will begin to bloom! Of course, the second were much closer to reality.