The nature of people

Thinking on the topic of sociotypes and their self -awareness.

For example, there are different modern currents that urge people to express themselves.

There are metalworkers, goths, emo, rape, party -minded people, etc. They all have similar characteristics that determine their belonging to one or another course.

This is the style of clothing, and the musical direction, lifestyle, philosophy in the end. And each of them is aware of this and identifies himself with the most interesting with him.

But one sociotype, which also has its characteristic features, but! - It does not have self -consciousness.

These are my dear, those who go for the eyes for the eyes!

Yes, possessing characteristic clothes, appearance, manner of speech and behavior, life values ​​(the cherished “4b” (women, loot, boxing and boomer)) and even philosophy, along with concepts, they will not ask themselves as a sociotype ...

Paradoxically, the cattle does not know that it is cattle ...

For them, they do not even know such a word, because no one says to them in the face, and they themselves, being incapable of somehow identifying themselves relative to others, do not understand their community and do not perceive themselves as a separate species.

They divide the rest into “real boys” and “P*Dorov”.

But, despite the obvious inability to analyze, nevertheless some of these individuals have reason and ingenuity.

This is most amazing at me.

In case of obvious inevitability in many issues, the survivability and the trick of some representatives is simply incredible!

And how so? Do some representatives of the human race really develop so unevenly?

Or how to explain this?

After all, it turns out that the point is not in stupidity, but in underdevelopment ... And how does it happen that only certain skills can develop without affecting others? After all, the ability to analyze should develop comprehensively.

Perhaps you will help me figure it out?