Date
Author
Ирина Андрианова
Preserved copy
Translated material
Double accounting and double dachas
On the shore of Lake Pionersky they are going to build 192 cottages, but on the site of the units that the developer has already been selling, other people's cottages have been located for 20 years.
Right now, when the shore, forest and adjacent dachas were inside a huge section of 35 hectares, which acquired the group of companies “Fact”, information about existing copyright holders from Rosreestr cards disappeared.
On the website of the Fact Group of Companies, customers are offered a real paradise: in the village of Sosnovy Beach they are waiting for their own coastal line with the beach, pier and slip for boats, but the most important thing is “centuries -old pines” and “large ancient boulders that will create a unique landing landscape”. The marketers who wrote this penetrating text were not aware that thereby they confirmed the fact of violation of the law: there is no information about the transfer of the plot to Cape Cherny from the forest fund to agricultural land. As in Soviet times, agricultural vehicles could be located here, if the “centuries -old” pines and the stone boulders managed to grow since then, it is also incomprehensible.
Version
It can only be assumed that until the mid-90s there was a practice of consolidating agricultural enterprises (not far from here were the lands of the former state farm "Ryabovsky") of the forest fund "for the needs of harvesting wood". At the same time, these sites were never withdrawn from the forest fund, and in the mid-2000s, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev ordered to determine the boundaries of rural forests and put on cadastral registration as areas of the forest fund.
Photo from the site of the cottage village
The order was not fulfilled, and more than 900 thousand hectares of the forests of our region were without protection. Formally, they still entered the forest register, employees of the local forestry received a salary allegedly for looking after them. Allegedly - because parallel to the successors of the state farms transformed in the CJSC made out the ownership of the former lands, cutting rural forests to them. The district administrations actively helped this: the plots were often located in very attractive places - on the shores of picturesque lakes. When the coast suitable for the development near the city ended, the stolen forests were used.
Activists of the “against the capture of lakes”, understanding the seizure mechanism of the “rural” forests of the former state farm, found that mass cottage clusters appeared on the banks of the lakes of Nakhimovskoye and Volochaevskoye, which were still listed on forest tablets as sections of the forest fund. They even managed to force the Committee on Natural Resources to file an application with the court on the demand for 14 such sites, but then the committee leaked the process, stopping appearing at the meeting, and the case was lost.
In total, 924 thousand hectares of forest were stolen in the Leningrad region - about a fifth of the entire forest fund of the region. In the Vyborg district, in addition to CJSC Zvelodubovo, the alienation of the forest was engaged in the successors of the Schestakovsky, Roshchinsky and Ryabovsky state farms. Judging by the location of the site on Lake Pionerskoye, this is the work of the last. Well, some circumstances boldly indicate that the design of the site as a “agricultural” did not even occur in 2006, as the public cadastral map says, but recently.
Photo from the site of the cottage village
Firstly, such a fantastic beauty cape from St. Petersburg would hardly have survived the period of the oil boom in 2006-2008. And the appearance of a crowd of wealthy buyers. In addition, according to Rosreestr, the site was put on the cadastral registration on May 22, 2006 - just 11 days before the amendment to the Land Code was forbidden to privatize the coastal strip. And what an amazing coincidence: the owners managed to arrange the cape with the coastal strip.
But finally disperses all doubts, the sale put on the sale along with other people's sites. The interlocutor of the “New”, whose cottage is near the turn of the road to Cape, was amazed to find that according to the plan of the “Fact” Group, on the site of its section, the checkpoint of the cottage village and “Guest parking” were already indicated. In a panic, rushing into the Office of Rosreestr, she did not find information about her cottage there. She and her neighbors for many years unsuccessfully tried to issue their ownership of their ownership. And then it turned out that the “fact” did it for them. True, in your favor.
In addition to those residents whose sections were absorbed in the cottage village of a pine beach, at least 120 people living in the neighborhood actively act against construction - who came last Saturday, August 19, for a folk gathering. The developer timed the beginning of construction work by the time the summer residents are separated.
According to local residents, equipment has already been brought to the site. The inhabitants tried to turn directly to the “Fact” Group of Companies, but they did not allow them to be the leadership, offering to send questions by mail. “Our connection is one -sided,” the correspondent of “New” explained in the “fact”. We sent a request to the company, but have not yet received an answer.
We propose to consider this publication an appeal to the environmental prosecutor's office and to forest supervision authorities. Now is the very situation when you need to intervene immediately.