Performers

Meanness has names and titles. Who tormented Alexei Navalny? We call it so

The torment of Alexei Navalny and his death became the result of actions/inaction and decisions of specific people. Among them are colonies who subjected him to torture in a schizo. Judges who recognized these bullying legal and rejected the complaints of the prisoner. Investigators who aroused one absurd business against him. Prosecutors who supported this lawlessness. And also all those who wrote denunciations and tried to stipulate Navalny in the investigation and in court.

It would seem that just people from just life, they have only such work. No, these are not just people. These are those who committed meanness.

The reasons found different: out of fear to be left without work, for the sake of stars and raises, I understand my duty in false.

Some of them reflected and, possibly, regrets the deed today. But only one judge Natalia Repnikova did not say nothing, replacing Navalny's conditional term in the IV Rosher case with a real one. In February 2021, she managed to write a letter to Navalny with her regret. And six months later, she died suddenly ...

Exactly four years ago, on January 17, 2021, Navalny returned to Russia from Germany, where he was treated after he was poisoned with a substance similar to a military poison. Immediately upon arrival at the Moscow Airport Sheremetyevo, he was detained and sent to the pre -trial detention center, later the court replaced him with a suspended term in the case of Yves Rocher (they allegedly found the economic composition, although the victim also denied the damage. And it was the case of Kirovles, at which the Gubernator Nikita Belykh spoke, which later turned out to be in the defense of Alexei. prison). Later, several more cases were aroused against Navalny, the courts continued to stamp the sentences and increase the term of imprisonment, and the colony officers - by order from above - created unbearable conditions for life, perfectly realizing that he had not yet recovered after poisoning, which miraculously ended in his death.

Help "New"

For which they formally persecuted Navalny

• In 2014, Navalny was sentenced to 3.5 years conditionally in the IV Rocher case about fraud, but in 2021 the court replaced his suspended term for real-allegedly due to the fact that the politician was not noted in the FSIN about the passage of the test deadline (although everyone knew that he could not noted for quite respectful reasons-he was awarded);

• In 2022, Navalny was a fine of 850 thousand rubles in the case of slander for the Veteran of the Second World War;

• After an appeal for the verdict, he was transferred to IK-2 in the Vladimir region in Pokrov;

• In 2023, Navalny was given 9 years in a maximum security colony in the case of spending donations and insulting the judge;

• In July 2022, the opposition was transferred to IK-6 in the Vladimir region in Melekhovo;

• In 2023, Navalny was sentenced to 19 years in a colony of special regime for the creation of an extremist community;

• In December 2023, he was sent to IK-3 Harp on Yamal.

So. Performers

Let's start with investigators and their assistants - "witnesses"

The case of fraud on an especially large scale (part 4 of article 159 of the Criminal Code) was initiated at the end of December 2020, when Navalny was still in Germany, where he underwent treatment after poisoning. The investigator for particularly important cases of the first investigative department of the Office for the investigation of crimes against state power and in the field of economics of the State Medical University of the SK, Roman Vidyukov accused the embezzlement of funds that sacrificed his funds and non -profit organizations. The investigation was under the leadership of the Major General of Justice and the deputy head of the Main Directorate of the IC of the Russian Federation Valery Alyshev .

According to the investigation, Navalny allegedly spent more than 356 million rubles from 588 million rubles of donations for personal goals - in particular, on the “acquisition of property, material values ​​and payment of expenses (including rest abroad).” According to Navalny's associates, a political matter, and was aimed at intimidating politics and not letting him return to Russia.

The very thing was “concocted” with the participation of “reusable” witnesses - a lawyer Ilya Rembolo and a former employee of one of the headquarters of Navalny* Vitaly Serukanov . After the guilty sentence to Navalny, both willingly distributed an interview. But then their "glory" came to naught. Now at the craft all his social activities was limited to what he writes in his telegram channel staring posts to the opposition and comments on the news in the pro-Kremlin media and other people's criminal cases. In particular, in an interview with the Komsomolskaya Pravda radio, Elena Blinovskaya predicted the “Queen of Marathons” that she would not be able to simply pay off debts and avoid court. And in 2024, the lawyer registered the trademark “Beautiful Russia of the Future” in Rospatent in his name, which was invented by Navalny.

In turn, Serukanov continues to cooperate with RT and “merge” the “compromising” to them to the Russian opposition in exile, constantly referring to anonymous sources.

The investigator Vidyukov was more fortunate - he received an increase, becoming the deputy head of the Main Investigation Department of the IC of the Russian Federation. According to media reports, he began his career in Volgograd in 2009 with the investigation of the case of the head of trade unions of the Volgograd region Vyacheslav Kobosev, later sentenced to nine years in prison. Later, the investigator was transferred to Moscow, where he participated in the investigation of cases against the former Minister of Economic Development Alexei Ulyukaev and the head of the Serpukhov district Alexander Shestun. He also led the investigation into the investigation of the case of the creation of an extremist community regarding the former head of Navalny’s headquarters in Ufa* Lilia Chanysheva. In 2021, President Putin awarded Vidyukov’s medal of the Order “For Merit to the Fatherland” of the II degree.

Judges

Navalny, recall, was detained immediately upon his arrival from Germany on January 17, 2021 in the YV-Roshe case, a conditional term for which he was accurately replaced by the real one before. The next day, the hearing was held as it is suppressed. Moreover, this action took place with a deliberately known end in the building of the second department of the police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the city of Khimki. Lawyers and the opposition himself were notified of him ... A minute before the beginning. The head of the police department, Khimki, Vitaly Senin, wrote that he was “an idea of ​​the imprisonment of Navalny in custody”, while the decision of the judge of the Khimkinsky city court of Elena Morozova said about the “extension of the detention” of Navalny for 30 days. As even the freshmen of the legal faculty know, the extension of the detention for a term of more than 72 hours is impossible.

We add that the miracle presentation of the Khimkinsky police supported this deputy city prosecutor Khimki Elena Koloskova supported this.

Well, the judge of the Moscow Regional Court Musa Musaev will leave the Khimkinsky City Court in 110 days on the “extension of Navalny’s detention for 30 days”, despite the lack of a norm in the law. Happens.

Then, the judge of the Simonovsky District Court of Moscow, Natalia Repnikova , goes to the advance. On February 2, 2021, she replaced Navalny's conditional term in the Yves Rocher case with a real one and appointed him 3.5 years in prison in a general regime colony. Although earlier the European Court of Human Rights (whose decisions Russia was still fulfilled at the time of 2021) established the fact of the unlawfulness of this sentence.

Six months later, Judge Repnikova died, according to official figures - from coronavirus. Navalny himself, already being in a colony in the Vladimir region and speaking at a meeting of the Moscow City Court on the video (considered his appeal about the verdict in the new case - about fraud and disrespect for the court), spoke about the act of Judge Repnikova. After she replaced him with a conditional term with the real one, the judge “handed over to Navalny’s acquaintances” a letter, in which she expressed regrets about her decision and called the politician “a brave man”.

“And after a while Natalya Repnikova died,” Mosgorsud Navalny reminded the judges of the Mosgorsud, noting that yes, “formally” this happened from the coronavirus. “I want to tell the court when you have a desire to pass through your friends that you participated in this process, do it carefully,” Navalny said then in May 2022.

The judges of the Moscow City Court, Ilnar Basyrov, Maria Dovzhenko and Maria Larkina, who listened to him, did not answer and upheld the 9-year sentence to Navalny in a strict regime colony in the fraud and disrespect for court.

By this time, two months earlier - in March 2022 - sentenced the judge of the Lefortovo District Court of Moscow Margarita Kotova - a valuable and proven frame of domestic modern justice. Supporters of Navalny accused her of telephone consultations right during the trial of the politician and issued a separate investigation about this. The SK did not engage in the official investigation of the stated facts. And President Vladimir Putin, by coincidence, Kotova, by his decree raised it to the post of judge of the Moscow City Court.

He approved the indictment on fraud against Navalny, by the way, the first deputy general of the prosecutor of the Russian Federation Anatoly Razinkin .

Judges of the Second Cassation Court of General Jurisdiction Ekaterina Pirozhkova , Natalia Vlasenko and Igor Chaplygin in October 2022 as part of the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Second Casserial Court of General Jurisdiction, the verdict of the signature of Judge Kotova (in the case of “fraud” and “disrespect for the court”). They also upheld the appeal ruling of the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court under the authorship of the judges Dovzhenko, Larkina and Basyrov (this trio, recall, did not find anything reprehensible in Kotova’s actions). He refused to transfer to the Supreme Court a complaint of Navalny to the sentence in the fraud case by the name of Alexander Kolyshnitsyn , judge of the Judicial Collegium of the Criminal case of the RF Armed Forces.

They still forgot to say about the judge of the Moscow City Court Dmitry Balashov -on February 20, 2021, he upheld the decision to replace a conditional deadline with a real one in the “case of Iv Rocher” with regrets, he would live and work in his place.

Another judge of the Moscow City Court, Andrei Suvorov, on August 4, 2023, sentenced Navalny already to 19 years in a colony of special regime in the criminal case of "extremism". And Mr. Suvorov, Technical Director of the Navalny Live Naval Live, sentenced Daniel to 8 years in a maximum security. Daniel was charged with extremist activity and its financing - he collected donations for the channel.

Already on September 26, 2023, the judges of the first appeal court of the general jurisdiction of Larisa Izotiev, Zoya Mikheeva and Viktor Rogov (was the chairman of the composition) approved the sentence to Navalny and cold in an “extremist case”.

The judge of the Supreme Court of Russia Oleg Borisov, the judge of the Supreme Court of Russia, scored the verdict on the “extremist” Case-on July 2, 2024, along with the judo colleagues Eduard Erdyniev and Svetlana Shmotikova, he rejected the cassation complaints of Navalny (already deceased), cold and their protection.

By the way, other judges of the Armed Forces made their contribution to the landing of Navalny even earlier. Thus, the deputy chairman of the Supreme Court Tatyana Petrova and the First Deputy Chairman of the Armed Forces, Peter Serkov, in the spring of 2018, legitimized the verdict in the IV-Roshe case, leaving him in force and ignored the resolution of the ECHR, which, as already mentioned, recognized this verdict to the wrongdoing.

And all the same Eduard Erdyniev , a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, who stuck an extremism sentence, earlier, in the spring of 2022, refused to consider Navalny’s cassation appeal to replace a conditional term with a real in the case of Yves Rocher

Now about the judges of the Vladimir region.

Here is Kirill Nikiforov , judge of the Kovrovsky city court of the Vladimir region. Under various and, something suggests, probably far-fetched pretexts, Mr. Nikiforov repeatedly refused Navalny to satisfy his claims against IK-6 in Melekhovo. The claims concerned, including the conditions of detention. In December 2024, Kirill Nikiforov went to increase - to the judges of the Vladimir Regional Court.

Other judges of the Kovrovsky City Court, Dmitry Samoilov and Irina Kim, acted in the same way - under various pretexts they regularly refused to satisfy the claims of the politician against the colony.

Judge of the Vladimir Regional Court Elena Astrovko . In April 2022, she refused to satisfy the appeal on the lawsuit of Navalny to IK-2 in Pokrov. Navalny demanded that the colony administration refuse to take into account the funds on the personal account of the convicted person as earned during the period of stay in the IR. Then Navalny was transferred from IK-2 in Pokrov to IK-6 to Melekhovo. And in April 2023, Judge Astrovko refused Navalny to satisfy his complaint on the claim already against the IK-6 administration-this time the convict complained about the non-giving winter shoes.

Ivan Yazev , the judge of the Petushinsky District Court of the Vladimir Region, in turn, on February 1, 2022, rejected Navalny’s lawsuit to IK-2 in Pokrov about his registration as an extremist.

Prosecutors

Now a little about prosecutors. Nadezhda Tikhonova , prosecutor of the department of the General Prosecutor's Office. She, as an impression, is a special prosecutor in all affairs against the politician. Follow the calendar. In March 2022, Tikhonova supported in court a charges against Navalny in the case of fraud and “disrespect for the court”, asks to recognize the opposition guilty and appoint him 13 years of colony and two years of restriction of freedom with a fine of 1.2 million rubles. A year and a half, in September 2023, she also intercedes the court of appeal to leave 19-year sentence to Alexei Navalny in an “extremist case”.

Or here the prosecutor of the criminal administration of the Moscow prosecutor's office Ekaterina Frolova . On February 2, 2021, she supported in court a replacement of a conditional term with the real in the Yiv Rocher case and on February 5, 2021, that is, three days later, Frolov supported the charges against Alexei Navalny in the case of “slander for a veteran”.

Rudgers

Long before Navalny, they began to constantly lock in the penalty area (schizo), in the IK-2 of the Intercession of the Vladimir Region he created unbearable conditions of existence. As the former prisoners of this colony told reporters, they specially created the “Politics” detachment in the IR - and the prisoners in it were instructed: not to talk and write down every step with Navalny.

In the spring of 2021, in the IK-2 of the Vladimir Region, he was not allowed to sleep normally in Pokrov. Then the opposition was recognized as “prone to escape” and put on preventive accounting. Therefore, at night, every hour, the FSIN officer shone in his face with a flashlight and loudly reported that the prisoner was on the spot. Because of this, the politician sued with the colony: “I want to get out of the register and sleep normally,” he said in court.

At the end of March, Navalny announced a hunger strike in the colony due to the fact that a doctor was not allowed to go to him. Then he complained of severe back pain, numbness of his legs, because of the pain he could not step on his leg. But, according to the lawyer Olga Mikhailova, only two Ibuprofen tablets brought him from the prison medical unit. The jailers arranged provocations: they put a man who constantly made different sounds on a neighboring bunk to Navalny, spat and masturbated. Another prisoner was allegedly sick with open tuberculosis (which later turned out to be untrue). Navalny in every possible way provoked the manifestation of aggression, but he did not give in to provocations. All these bullying took place under the head of IK-2, Alexander Mukhanov .

A series of deadlines in the schizu at Navalny began in the Vladimir IK-6 in Melekhovo when he announced the creation of the Promzone Prison Trade Union. The colony administration issued a policy of official warning that he "cannot violate the laws on rallies and processions."

“The first award was the wild eyes of the administration’s employees. They thought I was joking when I was talking about the trade union. And now they call it exclusively "illegal." Then they began to call me daily to the disciplinary commission and give me reprimands, ”said Navalny.

Then, on August 12, 2022, for the first time he was sent to a schizo for three days under the pretext of an unfastened button. Since then, Navalny almost did not leave the penalty insulator. According to the law, a prisoner cannot be sent to a schizo for more than 15 days. But the colonies administration easily bypass this restriction: they release the prisoner after the end of the term, on the same day they find a violation - and the next is again sent to the insulator. So, Navalny was put in a schizo 27 times. In total, from the beginning of his conclusion, he stayed in the penalty area of ​​308 days.

SHISO is a single camera in which you can’t take personal items and order food from a prison stall. Often Navalny was in the insulator to patients: with temperature, fever and cough. In a schizo you can’t lie in the afternoon - the bed is fastened to the wall.

Help "New"

For which Navalny put in a schizo

• Three days were given for an unbuttoned button

• пять суток — не сразу убрал руки за спину

• семь суток за то, что цитировал решение ЕСПЧ

• потом еще 15 суток за чтение решения ЕСПЧ

• 14 суток — за отказ мыть забор

• 11 суток за то, что «плохо убирал двор» и назвал сотрудника «лейтенантом».

Кто ухудшал условия содержания Навальному

Автором большинства рапортов на Навального стал рядовой сотрудник колонии Михаил Неймович . Руководство ИК буквально приставило его к заключенному, чтобы тот следил за каждым его шагом. На одном из заседаний, когда Навальный судился с колонией, Неймович хвастался, что за месяц составил «около семи» жалоб на политика, когда всего за этот же период написал 10 рапортов. Так, оппозиционера отправили в ШИЗО в седьмой раз из-за того, что он обратился к Неймовичу по фамилии, не назвав имя и отчество.

Как выяснила команда Навального и журналисты, руководитель колонии ИК-6 Дмитрий Ножкин вероятно мог получать указания из Москвы от вышестоящих начальников и проводил регулярные совещания со своими подчиненными в Мелехово. Все решения об отправке Навального в ШИЗО принимала комиссия, в которую входили девять сотрудников колонии в ИК-6:

1. Анатолий Горшков ( повышен до начальника центра трудовой адаптации осужденных при ИК-6 );

2. Дмитрий Макорин ( стал одним из заместителей начальника колонии );

3. Роман Вуколов;

4. Vladimir Polishchuk;

5. Светлана Балашова;

6. Данила Синюхин;

7. Николай Морковкин;

8. Артем Маркеев;

9. Дарья Швецова ( во «ВКонтакте» стоит статус: «Вы искали сокровище не там, где нужно. Только жизнь имеет ценность и каждое ее мгновение» ).

Навальный несколько десятков раз судился с двумя колониями во Владимирской области. Ни один из исков не был удовлетворен судом. Многие из этих заявлений касались попыток Навального оспорить его водворение в ШИЗО, а также изменить условия содержания в колонии, которые политик называл ненадлежащими.

Как правило, интересы владимирской ИК-6 в суде переставлял юрист-консультант Артем Крылов . Он доказывал в суде, что политика справедливо водворяли в ШИЗО, в частности, за умывание на полчаса раньше положенного срока. Утверждал в суде, что видеозаписи из колонии, которые политзаключенный просил представить в доказательство своих слов, исчезли из-за технических неполадок.

Также интересы колонии в суде представлял старший юрист консультант Илья Круглышев ( с 2018 года занимал должность начальника юридической службы управления ФСИН по Владимирской области. — Ред. ). В СМИ всплыла якобы его переписка, согласно которой сотрудники колонии будто бы сознательно создавали для политика невыносимые условия, а также придумывали разные версии событий, происходивших с ним в колонии.

Например, в октябре 2023 года появляется письмо от «неизвестного сотрудника ИК-6» с темой «Прогулка 22.09.2023. Версии на согласование». К письму были приложены файлы с двумя версиями, объясняющими поведение сотрудников колонии, в рамках одного и того же дела, заведенного по иску Навального. В этом иске политик утверждал, что в день очередного помещения в ШИЗО его незаконно лишили прогулки. В первой версии отказ в прогулке объяснялся «исключительно соблюдением распорядка дня». Во втором варианте — это уже было «исключительно волеизъявление осужденного Навального».

Кроме того, материалы этой переписки дают основания предположить, что администрация ИК-6 обратила внимание на посты Навального, которые выходили в соцсетях, пока он сидел в тюрьме, и пыталась выяснить, как именно он передавал информацию своим соратникам. Для этого цензоры изучили его переписку с близкими и друзьями — 462 письма и 45 телеграмм, отправленных политику, а также 31 письмо, которое написал он сам. Кроме того, они прослушивали разговоры Навального с матерью Людмилой Ивановной и женой Юлией и пришли к выводу, что политик не говорит об этом и во время телефонных звонков. В итоге начальник колонии Ножкин решил, что соратники могли получать сообщения политика из колонии только с помощью адвокатов.

В сентябре 2022 года в колонии было решено установить полный контроль над его коммуникацией с адвокатами. Руководство ИК-6 выпустило постановление о слежке за письмами и другими сообщениями, которыми политик обменивался со своими защитниками. Собственно, после этого и появилось уголовное дело против адвокатов Навального за участие в «экстремистском» ФБК .

Следователи, отказавшиеся возбуждать дело по факту смерти Навального

О смерти Навального 16 февраля 2024 года сообщило управление ФСИН России по Ямало-Ненецкому автономному округу. По утверждению ведомства, политик «после прогулки почувствовал себя плохо, практически сразу потеряв сознание», а реанимационные мероприятия результатов не дали. Следователь отдела по расследованию особо важных дел СУ СК России по ЯНАО Александр Варапаев отказался возбуждать уголовное дело по факту смерти Навального.

При этом тот же следователь издевался над матерью Алексея и дал разрешение на захоронение тела сына только спустя неделю — 24 февраля. Перед этим он поставил ряд условий Людмиле Ивановне относительно того, где, когда и как должны пройти похороны, и угрожал ей, что если она не согласится на тайные похороны, то «они что-то сделают с телом». Мама политика категорически отказалась выполнять эти условия, и после общественного давления тело политика все-таки отдали без какого-либо ультиматума. Навального похоронили первого марта на Борисовском кладбище в Москве.

Примечательно, что спустя три дня после того, как стало известно о смерти Алексея, президент Путин подписал указ, которым повысил ряд сотрудников силовых структур, в том числе замдиректора ФСИН Валерия Бояринева , которому присвоили звание генерал-полковника внутренней службы. По информации СМИ, он курировал содержание Навального в колониях. Так, на заседании суда в июле 2023 года выяснилось, что генерал прислал в ИК-6 Владимирской области, где Навальный тогда находился в заключении, распоряжение ограничить сумму, которую тот может тратить на еду. Не остался без повышения и Варапаев. Свою карьеру следователя он начал в 2012 году в Сургуте, с 2019-го — на Ямале. Его повысили до замруководителя отдела по расследованию особо важных дел.

В августе 2024 года вдова Навального Юлия опубликовала документ за подписью Варапаева, где говорилось, что причиной смерти мужа стало «комбинированное заболевание: гипертоническая болезнь с сосудистыми и органными поражениями, диффузный миокардиосклероз, осложнившиеся развитием отека головного мозга, фибрилляции желудочков сердца, отека легких». «Смерть Навального имеет аритмогенный характер, проявившийся нарушением ритма и проводимости сердца», — отмечалось в постановлении.

Навальная заявила, что при жизни «никаких заболеваний сердца у Алексея не было». Она отметила, что врачи, к которым она обратилась, пришли к одному и тому же выводу: «вскрывали, изучали, но ничего не смогли найти — тромба нет, признаков инфаркта и инсульта тоже». Навальная не верит в ту версию, которую представили в СК.

Несколько изданий получили доступ к официальным документам, связанным с гибелью политика. Среди них — якобы две версии постановления об отказе в возбуждении уголовного дела по факту смерти. В более ранней версии документа говорится будто бы о том, что Навальный 16 февраля «начал высказывать жалобы на резкую боль в области живота, у него началось рефлекторное извержение содержимого желудка, проявились судороги, и он потерял сознание». В отредактированной версии постановления, которая впоследствии была опубликована, о боли в области живота, рвоте и судорогах не упоминается.

В сентябре прокуратура ЯНАО признала незаконным отказ следствия возбуждать уголовное дело. На том все и зависло. Однако мало кто надеется на российских правоохранителей и успешный исход расследования. Журналисты и друзья Навального уверены, что оппозиционера убили в колонии, и намереваются это доказать.

This material was released in the fifth issue of the New Gazeta. Magazine". You can buy it in the online store of our partners .

* Организация признана экстремистской и запрещена в РФ.

** included by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation in the register of "foreign Agents".