Ryab on the water

Interested persons from competent youth, and in Russia there is one, begin to read pre -revolutionary Lenin. For our part, we, in order not to lag behind, re -read or simply remember, because the main thing is driven into the head literally and inappropriately. Create the organization of professional revolutionaries - and you will turn the world. In which direction and which world, it does not matter, you can in any and anyone. Today, the guys are talking about the "Russian world" - about taking him to the opposite side of Lenin. It seems far from the advent of such an organization. They still have to learn properly, which means, for example, a professional revolutionary. It is noteworthy, however, the very direction of the search. What it is called is not necessary to guess: bitterness, impatience and disappointment. Young hearts are hardened at the sight of everything at home. Impatience is born from acquaintance with how they live somewhere, and they are disappointed in themselves, as they should be, liberals are treated as a Vaska cat. He really needs your comments and calls!

In this regard, at a new corner, they look at how many pre -revolutionary escales, ssers, etc. were busy with internal showdowns. On their parties, in sheets and brochures, they often interpreted no longer about royal or even folk affairs, but about their own, inter -party and intra -party. So the well -known ideology was developed, and with it - strategy and tactics. Getting to the Leninist words: “We will go the other way”, they understand that there was not just a rejection of individual terror, but the emphasis on the planned, systematic, deeply echelonated destructive activity. We do not exhort you, the powers of this world, do not bring our opinions to you, but undermine your foundations with specific affairs, so one day we will touch them with a finger - and they will collapse.

The element may be worse than all Pavlovsky with Putin and Kadyrov, combined, but it is one thing to cut in the face of the revolution so as not to do troubles, and another - to continue to steal freely

“The Newsmaker was not tsarism for us,” the voice of Lenin came, “but we ourselves. The agenda did not dictate the gendarmes to us, but we are the first question with which we woke up: what is happening with us, in our ranks, in our movement, and then - what they have in power, that they still rewned.” It can be expected that it will begin, rearranging stresses in Russian speeches objectionable to the government. People are about to bother to expose the Kremlin in front of each other. Will focus on absolutely specific urgent and long -term matters of a revolutionary nature.

The weak harbinger of such opposition being and life can be considered the formation and the brief existence of the after -hearted coordination council. For once, people lived with their tasks, difficulties and squabbles. The regime was as if pushed away - they won, you are interested in only one point of view: in what place and how it is more painful to hit today, in which and how - tomorrow. This advice was immediately divided, unexploded in a way as the beginning of the RSDLP: on people who are ready to blame power, and on those who would only like to influence it.

Solzhenitsyn once in a “letter from the leaders of the conscientious union” almost confidentially informed them that the study of history made him opponent of revolutions. Among the sources that had influenced him, it was easy to guess the composition of Leo Tikhomirov, already known then in Samizdat: “Why did I stop being a revolutionary” (1888). The former terrorist named Tigrych for a long time believed that the revolutionaries were a rooted force, and when he saw that it was “ripples on the water”, became a monarchist. Thanks to Solzhenitsyn, the rejection of the revolutionary path entered dissident conversations as permissible. Otherwise, Gleb Pavlovsky, who declared after the Ukrainian Maidan-1, that he intends to "give the revolution in Russia in the face of Putin, would find other words. Why was the answer to him the contempt of both the young forces of the future Russian revolution and husbands with a moderate reputation? The whole thing is that they, according to them, leave no choice. It is really difficult, to force yourself to agree that to make political landings and murders, to twirl millions of two -legged, like dolls, can and should be to prevent a revolutionary explosion and subsequent disorder. Yes, the element may be worse than all Pavlovsky with the Putin and Kadyrov, combined, but it is one thing to cut in the face of the revolution so that it does not do troubles, and another - to continue to steal freely. “The thieves are nicer to me than the killer” - of course, this is already a classic, but the truth is that we say so when we get tired, or even for a red word. Living moral, and in this case is political, feeling, it is not so sophisticated, not so book. The thieves are capable of - how capable is! - To cause much more disgust than the killer, especially since they are very often in one person. And then it is no longer thought whether you are rippling or not ripples.

Anatoly Striere - writer and publicist, host of the Radio Liberty program "Your Letters"

Opinions expressed under the heading "Law" may not reflect the point of view of the editorial office