Mikhail Matveev (Samara)

The answer is Lyudmila Kuzmina

Incredible dispute turned around on the narrow expanses of the blogosphere (http://www.svoboda.org/content/article/25142587.html) in connection with the support of the Committee on Health, Demography and Social Policy of the Samara Gubdum of the deputy of the deputy Sivirkin for the cessation of budget financing abortions without medical and social indicators - the so -called "abortion on demand" of a woman.

Behind all these conversations, in fact, none of the people who raised the whores bothering, apparently, even to listen to my speech about the Sivirkin bill. What did I actually say about him?

In short, I said that I do not think that a simple ban on abortion can be solved, although Sivirkin’s merit was that he attracted attention to a really acute problem- 20 thousand abortions per year in the region only officially, and something needs to be done. What? I said - and made specific proposals - that it is necessary to concentrate efforts on the prevention of abortion, in particular, it is necessary to introduce special psychologists into all female consultations and abortion clinics, making a consultation with them for mandatory abortion.

Statistics in the regions where such a program works shows a reduction in abortion by several times (according to the Samara Ministry of Health - by 40%). These psychologists should not be subordinates to the head physician, often interested in money from abortion, but working under their program as part of the demography program. For the Samara region, 60 such bets need such rates. It takes 12-15 million rubles for this. per year.

The second thing I suggested is to ban abortion in private clinics by concentrating them in state medical institutions, because the state cannot control what and how they say to a woman in private clinics. The proposal is controversial, so I suggested sending it for study.

I also said that abortions became a huge business where they earn money on the abortion itself, and on the placenta and abortion material and therefore there was a large market that was not interested in narrowing. Therefore, the fight against his lobbyists will have to be difficult, but it is necessary to start with the propaganda of family values.

It seemed to me that my position was quite balanced, which Professor Zolotarev, and Renz, and many representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church, who spoke after me, noted after me, noted, among which, by the way, not everyone divides the cavalry approach to the case of Yesaul Sivirkin. But who will notice such subtleties.

Remember, there was such a party with the stupid name "Party of Life." But if you think about it, having returned to the explanation of Sivirkin about Satan, then, in general, all people on Earth are divided into two such large parties: one - a “party of life”, those that contribute to freely, or involuntarily the growth of the population, and the “party of death”, those that are a population on the planet “Earth” reduce.

In terms of Gumilyov’s terms: “system” and “antisystem”.

God and the devil.

All this decadence and performance, which revolves more and stronger around Russia, Europe and planets and simple old "traditional values".

It has long been clear to me that only one thing is the measure of the work of any government - the population is growing, or is it declining?

If it grows, if women want to give birth to children, then they believe in the boobs that there will be shelter, there will be work, there will be bread, places in kindergartens, school, there will be peace.

If it falls, and demography becomes the destiny of the migration service - at least from morning to evening, screaming about successes about success - there are no success.

Life is the birth of children. This is not gays, not frozen chicken in the vagina, and not the right to abortion. All this is an antisystem. In the terms of Esaul Sivirkin - Satan.

And life is God.

Mikhail Matveev, independent deputy of the Samara Provincial Duma