Your letters

Boris Konstantinov from Moscow: “There are many smart, talented people who, alas, mix“ human rights ”and“ rights of a bandit ”on the radio station“ Freedom ”. And this is not the same. Bandit is not a person, he is a wolf, and he lives according to wolf laws, and“ rights ”are wolves, and not human ones.”

Imagine, Mr. Konstantinov, that you were taken away for this letter on the Radio "Freedom". I think you can easily imagine it, although our youngest listeners should already (or more) explain what the word "took" under the Soviet regime, up to the appearance of Gorbachev in the Kremlin and especially under Stalin. “They took it” - it means they were arrested for nothing: you decided that you are unreliable, the “enemy of the people”. The letter abroad in this left no doubt. Then Mr. Konstantinov, like millions of his compatriots in the past, who was as sincere as he, believed that “rights” should and should only have ours, only in the law -abiding, only in the real Soviet man - then he might have thought differently. If the “human rights” are not recognized for all two -legged, without exception, the no obficables suffer in anything most, but won the discharge. The rights of the bandit are equal to human rights just in order to protect a person from a bandit. Where these rights are divided, the state occupies the place of an ordinary bandit - it becomes a gangster state.

Markin Vladlen Nikolaevich, an old glaciologist, that is, a specialist in glaciers, writes: “The policy of Russians will never bring them victory in Chechnya. I don’t know what is depicted and written on soldiers' medals who generously distribute Russian generals in smoke breaks and between battles. On my honey, which I received a 17-year-old soldier, it was written for the defense of the defense:“ For the defense of the defense. Caucasus. "I was an ordinary of the 37th Field Army. They did not tell us under what slogans the Chechens fought against us against us. In the fall of 1942, they opened in our rear, in the mountains, the" second front. "Our troops went into the mountains, all the equipment-mortars and light guns were covered on mules and donkeys. Simple and frozen and frozen and frozen. The soldiers were taken out of the Chechen two-wheeled arches on the long-earned fourth-legged traction. With the Kalmyks, the “traitors of the homeland”, as I wrote in my diary, after a long journey through the 30 -degree frost in the calf, without stoves of the living “traitors”, we unloaded these echelons I don’t know among the frozen people, I know what the old people and women have prevailed among the frozen ones, and now we will take revenge on the Russians in the North Caucasus, in 1986, when they were in Dagestan. In Dagestan and throughout the North Caucasus.

Listeners continue to talk about the expression "wet in the toilers." Viktor Gadyatsky, Associate Professor of Philosophy, writes that this expression is a point where two environments of Russian society are in contact: criminal and police. The criminal environment, he will recall, is the environment where the most remnants of ancient, cave. “Wet in the toilet” is an expression in which a certain savage ritual, a magical action, is reflected. It’s not enough just to kill the victim. You need to urinate, spit, to erect other waste from the body. This is a rite of posthumous humiliation of the enemy. Similar rites are accepted in some modern criminal communities. Mr. Gadyatsky also recalls the "grandfather" in the Russian, and before that in the Soviet army - that the beating of the "grandfathers" "Salag" usually occurs in a waste place. The point is not only that this is the most convenient place - its choice goes back to primitiveness, Gaditsky writes.

A letter from the eagle from Mr. Ermishin: “Lenin said: every American dollar is impregnated with blood, and it’s true. You watch a film and you wonder how women and men, even children, for the center of each other, gnaw at each other. If so, what kind of wilds, barbarians. Vampires. I imagine how you will read my letter. But I am conclusions from your programs and your films.

As you write, be sure to send it, Mr. Ermishin, I will read from crusting to the crust, maybe something in front of the microphone ... It seems to me that you are positive, thorough, keep your savings in dollars, so, in any case, most Russians who can postpone something. District grandmas in the dollar has long been better versed than in the ruble, there are such that the fake dollar recognizes by smell, and there is no magic, real and fake money really smell differently, with the well-known thinness of the smell, they say, they say.

"Russia will not perish from hostilities, not from terrorists and corrupt officials, not from drug addiction and AIDS. Russia can die and already die from the all -pervasive and all -consuming" popes ". Pops becomes the norm. It becomes everywhere and in everything, and not just on the stage. The whole air is permeated today." "Pops", as this listener (and I, with him) understands it - is the initiative of the population left by the authorities, the population, who turned out to be without any care and supervision, all kinds of initiative of the Russian people, from top to bottom. These are spectacles and entertainment, public undertakings, family orders, street, school, student, office morals. "Pops" on the stage and on the screen, as can be seen from the very word, is designed to attract a large number of people. "Pops" is democracy, it is a triumph of the undemanding majority, it is the opposite of all benign, selected, chosen. "Pops" is freedom, which not everyone uses as I would like. "Pops" is that regrettable circumstance that not all people in the world are as correct as me. "Pops", finally, is the terrible circumstance that I did not create humanity, I do not lead it along my chosen path. How does such and such a singer dare to appear on the stage, if her manners are unpleasant for me? And they have long been unpleasant - she has never been married yet when I called her art art for the sellers of a vegetable store. And she sings everything, jumps on the stage and sings. I don’t know how I haven't gotten away from such a disorder.

A programmer from Moscow writes, 32 years old, the Gaidarovets calls himself "Former Liberty Radio Listener, begins the letter not in the word" Hello!, "Farewell": "Farewell, Anatoly Ivanovich!" “If you do not cut the Basayev and Hattabov, trouble will come to Russia forever,” he writes. The young man is outraged that "it is impossible to explain to the well -fed and fairly western layman that the entire population of Chechnya should suffer for bandits and, therefore, it supports them either directly or with its inaction." He asks why the West did not give Russia an exact weapon if he regrets civilians, why, together with Russian human rights activists, calls for negotiations with bandits who cut off their fingers in hostage children. He (and there are many such letters) is particularly interested in my personal opinion - does not want to believe that I finally sided with the "Chechen bandits and Russian holy legal entities", as the letter says. Well, well ... first of all: how are you with your health, Mr. Programmer? I do not ask from myself: such a question is in several letters, the authors are asking to ask it not to all warlike listeners of “freedom”, but only the youngest of them. If your health is in order, then why are you not in Chechnya with weapons in your hands? Polls (Russian) show that the majority of the majority, which for the war in Chechnya, prefer to fight there to the last drop of blood, but not their own, not their son, husband, brother ... Yes, here is the position of most of your like -minded people: "If the Basaev and Huttabs do not express - the trouble will come to Russia forever, but even if someone, not my son, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother, not my brother Husband. Meanwhile, the vast majority of killed, raped, robbed by Russians and Chechens in Chechnya both in the first war and the second, were killed, raped, robbed by Russian troops. In Russia, anyone who wants to know, but many do not want to know this, as well as the fact that the vast majority of hostages in Chechnya are Chechens themselves. Words: "It is difficult to explain to the Western layman (well -fed and quite) - this is a long -standing" patriotic "password. As you can see, today the defectors from democracy are accepted into this camp ... The position of the West is very simple. The West condemns mass military and other crimes of Russian troops in Chechnya. The West believes that these crimes are not justified by the crimes of the Chechen side. I believe that the West must condemn these crimes, otherwise they will be even more than Russian soldiers and officers in Chechnya willingly agree with: "Yes, mother-re-relive, our brother if you can’t hold your hand, not only" perfumes ", but we kill each other!" And they kill - I’ll have a fuck, I will fool around ...

The author of the next letter considers all this by the costs of the Russian Democratic Revolution. “Putin’s government,” he writes, “Va -Bank went, resorting to radical surgery in Chechnya. The rallying of the people around Putin is the defense of the Russian revolution, Anatoly Ivanovich! This revolution was far from velvet - the inheritance is too difficult, but it is necessary to protect it? If Putin’s defeat, the Makashovs and Barkashovs will come, and not Kovalev.

This is written in response to my words in the previous program, which I repeated today, that the Western call to Russia: "Wash, Tovo, quieter!" In no way can he damage the cause of the Russian democratic revolution that in this appeal there is more knowledge of Russia than in letters whose authors repeat and repeat the envious stupidity about the “well -fed and satisfied Western layman” who, they say, cannot explain anything about real life. Well, who lives a real life, who understands in it, if not he, the Western layman, who does not interfere with his satiety and contentment more than anyone else in the world - and with the greatest really!

"My husband listens to your radio station in the evenings, and since I am in the bedroom, I also have to listen to. Be my will, I would have long dispersed this vile radio station" Freedom ", which is digging in shit, from the fly made, as from Babitsky - Alexander the Great. The employees of the “Freedom” can be sold to the USA, which for a long time they want to ruin Russia. The Russian is given to this suffering people to get out of economic trouble.

I did not quite understand, Marya Petrovna, your thought about the "other countries of the former Soviet Union": have Americans who are easier than steamed turnip have already dealt with them, or will they cope in the near future? Write to me about your husband. What does he tell you about the programs of "Freedom"? Why is it listening to them? I have one more question, and I will probably ask you it, although you can decide that I find fault with your words. You write that Russia is a rich, powerful country that Americans have long wanted to ruin. Therefore, they have not yet been ruined. But then you write that the people of Russia are a suffering people, that he is in economic misfortune from which Putin will withdraw him. So, after all, they ravaged? It is probably necessary to say a few words about why I pay attention to these inconsistencies in the letter of Marya Petrovna. The folk hums does not live reliable information and connected thoughts. She lives scattered, not interconnected, inventions. The appointment of any great fiction is always one thing: to unite people, to keep the threat in the pot, prevent it from splashing. Only those inventions that her heart are mashed by the gut. The largest and most universally recognized inventions are sometimes called national ideas. Mary Petrovna is pleased to think that her country is rich and powerful. Once rich and powerful, it means that someone is sure to envy her, gets risen to her wealth and seeks to undermine her power. At the same time, Marya Petrovna wants to think that Putin is the Savior. So, there must be a people subject to salvation, the suffering people - a people who are in economic trouble. Inside each of these two inventions, everything is connected, and they are not connected among themselves. If they are compared, then they will be mutually destroyed. But Marya Petrovna is not required to compare them, it does not occur to her to take care of the coherence of her inventions. Gusha does not notice the contradictions, because he does not suspect their existence. Russian folk hums, as it turns out, is not yet ready to accept modern ideas about the world, for example, it cannot, for example, put a person above the state, but it needs to live with something, and after known hesitation, she returns to the usual, restores the tested crossbreeds, affirms her shook unity on old, rude and therefore most reliable fabrications - reliable, for the time being, for the time being.

“I live in Moscow, I’m 20 years old, I’m still a student. My parents are civil servants (a teacher and an engineer), so since I have been 14 years old, mainly with computers, until August 17 I could even classify myself as a middle class. More than a year ago, a computor weekly came out with the theme of the number:“ Damn it! In order to leave the Russian Federation, but just no one needs me to the West, although if you have enough money, you can live here. One friend, a former military man who has a very prestigious specialty in the West (he is a telecommunications specialist) has gone to the United States at the invitation of a certain company, receives 3 thousand a week, at his disposal, he said that he understood that he had to live only when he left Russia. It was tired of living in a good house, traveling in a good car and engaged in the fact that the Russians will not have their choice in the near future, they need not an economic rise, but the latest presidential election The parish to the power of Vladimir Vladimirovich has stopped, only the crumbs of the Tshaz and the generals reporting on the “stripping” are shining in the TV. It is also that everything (I mean most of the society) was simply built in front of the BB. I lowered my last name.

A letter from Sweden: “I am 30 years old. I listened to Elena Boner on the waves of“ freedom ”. I don’t believe in God, but I pray for it. When I studied at school, it was written about Russian heroes who released the great from the Tatar yoke. It took 300 years. Today the Chechen national liberation movement is called terrorists. I think that our heroes also did not have the means in the same. The struggle, despite their exploits, is still not released from spiritual slavery, I don’t want to study Putin, I want to get married! I can’t understand me - I don’t call myself.