
If acting They will be appointed, it means that the issue will be resolved in December, when elections to the Legislative Assembly will be held in St. Petersburg. There is reason to believe that these elections “United Russia”, even, with the most involved administrative resource, voting by mail, attracting soldiers, patients of psychiatric hospital and migrant workers, will lose to “fair Russia”. Then one of the two, Sergey Mironov or Oksana Dmitrieva, will have the opportunity to become a new mayor. Such a political experiment, in the second city of the country, to allow the representative of the Party of Power to power, but a representative of some opposition, will be evidence of the choice made in the Kremlin. If this is allowed, then Dmitry Medvedev will “steer”. If not, then Vladimir Putin.
If acting They will not appoint, but will be appointed at once a new governor, which means “steering” will be Vladimir Putin. And the appointment, whatever he is - of the federals or local, from Smolny, will become, as Oksana Dmitrieva aptly expressed - "a spit in the face of Petersburgers."
I will not talk about the ugliness of the situation that has developed today in the country, when the Russians are forcibly harnessed to idiotic thoughts about which of the two, Putin or Medvedev, will become the president.
Do not spit in the face of Petersburgers.
This is fraught. Petersburgers are already tired.
There were many local mayors in my memory. Grigory Romanov, Boris Gidaspov, Anatoly Sobchak, Vladimir Yakovlev, acting Alexander Beglov, Valentina Matvienko ...
Sometimes, on the gray and beautiful days of our Leningrad youth, between hitchhiks, work in stoemers and underground rocks, we recorded the presence of a certain chief boss, Grigory Romanov, who spoke somewhere and said something, probably very important, about communism, and our reflection on these fleeting visions can be compared with reflection with reflection Cooked hippies in connection with the costume of an accidentally met senator or congressman. Which, incidentally, does not detract from the deep sacred meaning of the very paradigm of the Soviet model. As the Chinese sage put it, a good ruler is the one who is not visible to the people. In those days, pioneers-like today in Pyongyang-went in line, and the chief chief was somewhere there. In heaven. And in portraits. Sometimes, however, in parades it could be seen near the Winter Palace, on the rostrum. And then he disappeared again.
Today this - unfortunately for the main boss and fortunately for us, pioneers - does not work. Other times.
You can nostalgic for those times as much as you like, opening, for example, the memorial board to the chief boss, Grigory Romanov, but we do not have new pioneers to walk, for you.
The chief boss died.
It is sad and tragic that the current chiefs do not want to realize this. For St. Petersburg, this tragedy is today revealed in the destroyed historical center. For Russia - in everything you see.
If the next boss, having come to St. Petersburg, will again be stupidly pushing and building himself as the main boss, he will not cause anything but disgust and sensation of the advancing tragedy.
And what Valentina Matvienko left behind is clearly visible from the results of a survey conducted by the journalists of the newspaper.SPB.
To the question "Do you think that the authorities make decisions and act primarily in the interests of the city residents?" Only 1.4% of respondents answered positively. 9.8% believe that this is true only sometimes. The vast majority (88.8%) of the survey participants answered negatively. The survey was attended by 1392 people.
Farewell, Valentina Ivanovna!