Translated material
Additional materials
Comments ( Add comment )
- Wrote 02/15/2011 at 16:28
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Disagreed
Russia has always lagged behind European countries, both before revolutions and after revolutions.
answer
- Wrote 02/16/2011 at 11:39 am
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
The article is good to the babble of pro -Western shelma!
The author of the Liberal shouts the facts more cunning. He is trying to prove the non -alternativeness of the Westernnic Way of Russia's development. But this is a lie! Everyone who succumbed to the temptation of Westernity (starting with Turkey, with which they began to “be friends” against Russia and ending with Russia itself) became underdeveloped appendages of Western civilization!
Russia has another way! His spokesmen in the nineteenth century were Slavophiles, starting with Khomyakov. Who is studying their labors now? They were stunned and forgotten, because Their work is contrary to both Westernic communist ideas and with Westernic liberal! So, in vain, the author is trying to stroke the idea “Orthodoxy, autocracy, nationality”!
answer
- Wrote 02/16/2011 at 15:31
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
And then the Slavophiles were not the same liberals, only on the side. What are the unique recipes of special and convertible, except for vague "collegiality", did they mean?
answer
- Wrote 02/15/2011 at 16:57
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Some kind of empty and duty note. So what are the results of the great reforms in Russia - that despite all their successes, violence has become a way of life, and freedom has become a synonymous of lawlessness?
answer
- Wrote 02/18/2011 at 09:53
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Note not about the great reforms of the century before last. She is about today's day.
I completely agree with the author’s conclusion: "It is better to periodically change the authorities peacefully following the results of the elections than the collapse of the authoritarian regime as a result of the troubles, especially as a result of the Russian rebellion, decisive and merciless."
That's just what to do if the current rulers have already imagined themselves to be kings, and the bulk of the population as was an uneducated serf mass, so it remains?
answer
- wrote today at 09:00
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Our rulers did not imagine themselves to be kings, but by the gods-nickname not controlled and not subject. And as you know, it corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. So Russia does not have the future, so that they would not broadcast to us there. Visiting migrant workers of lower quality will not raise the country and they do not need it, they are strangers. And they leave their own in packs, and, probably, it suits our rulers, because the most limp and defenseless remain. There are no problems to replace such, they will not be able to turn the situation. But Russia is not some kind of Kyrgyzstan, we have everything for a worthy life of the country. That's just there are no worthy, wise and decent rulers. There are temporary workers who want to sit to the last, and then go to London.
answer
- Wrote 02/15/2011 at 17:11
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
"People want to have a decent quality of life, expressed today on good roads, in affordable housing and high -quality housing services, in modern healthcare, in effective and incorruptible police, in stable prices ..."
"Baby son came to his father, and Kroch asked:" What is good and what is bad?
In general, listen (read) kids.
answer
- Wrote 02/15/2011 at 17:51
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
The result of great reforms
Give capitalism with a human face !!!!
answer
- Wrote 02/15/2011 at 18:19
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
I did not expect such a flat note from a former theoretic physicist,
And now (what is natural) to the head of the department of law (!) In the MFT. It is like a public administration faculty in Moscow State University, created by Vyacheslav Volodin (Pedros), a publicly exposed bribe taker and rogue. Complete degradation.
The author offers, instead of long -standing on the throne of one crook, a quick change of crooks (an overflow from empty to empty, awl on soap). All crooks want to sit on the throne comfortable, i.e. Changing nothing but a specific g ** py. And if you change, then this is deadly and not for such "eagles" as Nadezhdin (the head of the law of law in the MIPT, I found what to brag !!!). Crooks of Russia are in a state of low start.
".... Hundreds of thousands of people go out (Tunisia, Egypt) on the streets not because they have nothing to eat, but because they have much less chance of a decent life than rulers who have been in power for decades ..."
Half of Egypt lives at $ 2 per week.
"... an increase in the cultural and educational level of the population, the expansion of civil freedoms, the development of industry and the growth of cities inevitably led ..."
This has not threatened us since 1991.
answer
- Wrote 02/16/2011 at 09:31
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Too many false myths ...
The note is built on myths that the current government imposes on the electorate, but under which there is no real basis ...
Firstly, the elite goes to reforms, with a limitation of its own privileges, solely for the sake of holding power, and not for the sake of strengthening the fatherland ... and when it does not go ..., it loses power completely ...
Secondly, it was impossible to avoid the bourgeois revolution of 1917, because of the too deep crisis between the government and the people, and the contradictions between the monarchy and progress ...
Thirdly, the CPSU did not bring the economy of the USSR to collapse, it was brought to the collapse of the Liberal reformers, and the CPSU of the Brezhnev convocation brought it to the crisis ...
For the past 20 years, Russia has been in a deep crisis due to the lack of industry, agriculture, science, and lasts exclusively on the supply of raw materials in the metropolis ... Its collapse is inevitable, since the elite will not even give natural resources to the gallows ...
In fourth, states are falling apart without revolutions, an example of the collapse of the USSR, despite the referendum in which the population spoke out for the USSR, and the revolution, after the arrival of new regimes, on the contrary, can connect and strengthen the lifting, for example, the Bolshevik revolution or revolution in the United States ...
In the fifth, revolutions do not depend on the level of education of society, this is the naive of the current government, that to keep in obedience an uneducated cattle is easier, but this is a deep error that has no confirmation in history ...
answer
- Wrote 02/17/2011 at 14:25
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
It is strange why Nadezhdin did not touch Belarus?
Well, where, where, in Belarus (according to the political views of Nadezhdin) with the departure of the dictator and the arrival of interchangeable dolls are simply doomed to heyday, culture and healthcare.
answer
- Wrote 02/16/2011 at 09:57
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
You can step into feudalism, where the oligarchy pulls Russia, but it is impossible to stay in it.
The revolution is a regular socio-economic process in society and you should not be afraid of it. The whole development of the world community is a continuous chain of revolutions.
Mr. Medvedev struggle with all his might promotes the revolution in Nano, but to no avail, because in Russia there are no prerequisites for her in the absence of high-tech industries in industry. Revolutions are not made by order from above, they should have a social need.
answer
- Wrote 02/17/2011 at 11:01 am
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
The movement of socio -cultural democracy is a revolution with a human face
In my opinion, it is necessary for the Democrats to move from social democracy, to the movement of socio-cultural democracy (DSKD). This movement is based on only three principles:
1. Knowledge should dominate ideology.
2. The company should dominate the state.
3. The economy should dominate politics.
In this case, democracy will become the power of the enlightened people.
As primary knowledge, it is best suited, due to its ontological completeness, the universal ontological models of society (person) and culture (thinking). Each person can have his own idea of knowledge, but only those who relate not to the dogma can participate in the movement, but as what is checked by social and individual practice.
This movement, where the personality and society are equalized in rights. Culture is not just beneficial, but that which has independent value. Ultimately, a person is a measure of everything.
And this is a condition for preserving life on the planet.
The anti -intellectual situation at school is primarily beneficial to temporary workers, the authorities and its servants, like Surkov. After all, the main threat to them is becoming more and more in front of them - this is the emergence of the movement of socio -cultural democracy. Where the standard of knowledge is high, and where universal ontological models of society and culture will inevitably win in school. This knowledge will sweep them out of their posts and send their numerous servants in the suck. Now this process begins, although it has not yet gone properly, but the signs are already visible in those old demagogues. Which, like all opportunists, are afraid not to be in the wake. But they do not get this surfing. See the principles of DSKD:
answer
- Wrote 02/16/2011 at 13:56
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
150 years of cancellation of serfdom
It would be necessary to somehow note this date and put a monument to the victims of serfdom. The current generation does not remember anything about it. The school is unlikely to say something about this. We found those who found former serfs. They did not speak very well about the Rosia nobility. So let her descendants erect a monument. After all, the former clanships and Komsomol members have erected a monument to the victims of totalism. Mutually.
As for the article, then superficial. It cannot be said that the union broke up without sacrifices. They are huge. The heads of the country (G. H. Popov - an interview with Gordon Boulevard. 2010), and this rarely happens, if it has ever happened at all.
answer
- wrote today at 09:10
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
These leaders therefore ruined the state that everyone grabbed his estate and became the sole master. They ruined in personal interests.
answer
- Wrote 02/17/2011 at 14:46
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
Actually, the basic elements of serfdom were perfectly preserved at the "scoop":
The collective farmers were given passports only under Khrushchev, an oprichnina -in the form of a KGB, characteristics from a bar in the form of bosses - for everything that is needed and not needed, prohibitions of departures abroad - for those who “face (not only) have not come out” - you can continue for a long time.
So it is still unknown: what date should be celebrated in reality ...
answer
- Wrote 02/17/2011 at 15:11
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
A joke in the topic
Sits tandem by the fireplace and talks.
I will give - you and I already have everything: at home, yachts, oil, forest. It's time to think about souls ...
GDP - yes ... Ah, a village of Soul for 500 would not have prevented me.
answer
- Wrote 02/17/2011 at 16:15
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
In Russia, all spiritual ones have always loved ...
answer
- Wrote 02/20/2011 at 17:36
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
Universal joke with a beard
If the lady and GDP is replaced by Nadezhdina and, for example, Nemtsov will be more believable since this party lobbies the interests of 3-5% of the active population and quite cynically neglects the interests of the rest.
answer
- wrote today at 05:24
- link
- complain
- (Delete a comment)
- (block the user)
Nemtsov, going to the square, defends the rights of 99.9% of the population, but it is possible that you do not get into this percentage if your constitutional rights are indifferent to you.
answer