Actually, Queen Elizabeth Kate is not a mother-in-law, but her husband’s grandmother. And the mother -in -law - there would be Princess Diana.
I like • I don't like • answer
A strange blunder for such a “smart girl” - L. Gushchina: immediately catches his eye - to call Queen Elizabeth a mother -in -law Kate?! And this is a "real journalist"?! Yeah ...
For Lola: not “nada” is written, but “it is necessary”!
I like • I don't like • answer
The ring stalled that the bride like a virgin is a virgin. And in general it is written correctly, the monarchy was now.
I like • I don't like • answer

The first bastard is mysterious, like the article itself. And the Elezaveta for Katherine is perhaps really a grandmother.
I like • I don't like • answer
I did not understand what the author wanted to express. And what is the first picture?
And why did everyone get attached to the ring? If it were easily worn, it was just as easily and starred and the chances of losing it are very large. The normal ring is always dressed with some difficulty.
I like • I don't like • answer
"Blowjob in Russia is more than blowjob"
I like • I don't like • answer
You are right about the ring. One of my relatives got married, and a rather free ring was picked up to her. After returning home from the wedding celebration, the young people, before going to bed, decided to somehow streamline their numerous gifts, began to unpack them and lay them out, and lowered the packaging into the garbage chute. After some time, the young suddenly found that her ring had disappeared from her hand. She is in tears, because the sign is unhappy. The young people spent the rest of the night together with the closest relatives in the garbage cell, carefully sorting out the garbage accumulated there. By morning, heroic efforts were successful - the ring was found. And although this marriage turned out to be strong and, in general, happy (more than 30 years have passed since then), I would not wish anyone such a wedding night.
I like • I don't like • answer
I am not a professional historian, nevertheless, by 99.99% I am sure that the author is not quite in the topic about how the brides for the kings were chosen, including Ivan the Terrible. She is the right to be chosen for him from the girls of “low origin, despising the famous tsarist births,” but the girls of an insignificant work is still a girl from the noble clans, they could be called “artistic”, but they were not “low” (that is, novoransky) origin. The nasal or yard girls are precisely girls of low origin, not noblewives, and they are not a noblewoman for the tsar. Choose.
Read more: http://www.gzt.ru/opinion/column/lilia-guschina/-u-tserkvi-stoyali-karety-/359346.html?from=copiedLink
I like • I don't like • answer
It was very touching to observe this magnificent sight. Perhaps someone did not like something, this sometimes happens. All the princes are not enough for what the point is to praise and admire, in any case, you can find some kind of defect, and better a lot of defects to express your disagreement, inelerance, immunity, rejection, etc. And we ordinary people really liked everything, even empathized and cried. And it was very joyful that sometimes fairy tales still come true. And Cinderella was beautiful, and the prince was real, and the grandmother was wonderful, and the wedding was royal. So everything is cool. I liked it very much.
I like • I don't like • answer
Edward was not XVIII, but VIII. Up to eighteen Eduardes on the British throne has not yet reached.
I like • I don't like • answer