Excessiveness

Unlike the expressions to which the president prefers is “to wet in the toilet”, “it will not seem a little ...”, the word excessiveness, like the very concept, conveys quite accurately what is happening to us. V.V. It took Putin when it was necessary to characterize the actions of the prosecutor's office, which planted Vladimir Gusinsky to the bars. There is a great demand for this definition! With excessive impudence, the general prosecutor dodged three days from the announcing journalists. With excessive naivety, the president complained about the shortcomings of telephone communications. With excessive permissive, security forces in the media holding were ruled, waving machine guns. With excessive shamelessness, they are prepared with the help of licenses to take the media for a short leash. With excessive haste, attempts are made to reform the government ... and where, in fact, is this excessiveness? What root does it grow from? It reminds of itself whenever there is no responsibility for the state and its officials. Who answered for a shameful provocation with Babitsky? Who is punished for unreasonable warnings of the TVC that the Pravda Ministry rivets? Rhetoric questions! And when it is finally managed to prove through the court the lawlessness of the prosecutor's office, the efforts of state minds were aimed at refuting the court decision. The demand for excessiveness is great where the problem is being solved: everyone from small to great execute the team: “To the leg!” Those who are not ready for this doom themselves to tests, which, when the advancing regime, will not seem excessive. Do the media want to maintain independence? So, it's time to start their elimination - they are now striving to eradicate NTV. And getting rid of rebellious structures, according to the logic of struggle, inevitably leads to the elimination of an independent person. And hello to you from the unforgettable Joseph Vissarionovich, in whose birthday was the glasses in the office of V.V. Putin heads of deputy factions. True, without Grigory Yavlinsky: he did not want to participate in this. It remains for us to answer two sacramental questions for Russian society. Who is to blame that we have such a president? And what if he is? However, the first question is more likely to be designed for the traditional languor of the Russian soul. Summer will pass soon, and we will lay out the solitaires with long winter evenings: did the president know, guess or meant? He leaves hats in his snow on the snow or is dancing to the music from the Glot-9? And only by spring, most likely, we’ll figure out that we chose to rule the state, with permission to say, a leader who was never elected as a deputy of the district council. And what to do now? Confronting all acceptable forms of the onset and triumph of the anti -democratic regime. And no one will remain lonely in this. The nonsense that accompany the actions of the current leaders of the state, with amazing speed, add up a protest opposition. Recent events forced the bankers to unite, brought the journalists closer, again raised many people to rallies. Although, to be honest, so far we have achieved little. In the government, people remain, for a long time already morally decapitated. But, you must admit, at the same time: the decisive public opinion does not work out on one day. Remember how long we moved by eighty -fifth year, achieving an hour of change. He will break through in the present life. A leader who is not counted with public opinion has never been prosperous. And not from a good life, believe me, I had to change the preventive measure for the head of the media holding.

Unlike the expressions to which the president prefers is “to wet in the toilet”, “it will not seem a little ...”, the word excessiveness, like the very concept, conveys quite accurately what is happening to us. V.V. It took Putin when it was necessary to characterize the actions of the prosecutor's office, which planted Vladimir Gusinsky to the bars.

There is a great demand for this definition!

With excessive impudence, the general prosecutor dodged three days from the announcing journalists.

With excessive naivety, the president complained about the shortcomings of telephone communications.

With excessive permissive, security forces in the media holding were ruled, waving machine guns.

With excessive shamelessness, they are prepared with the help of licenses to take the media for a short leash.

With excessive haste, attempts are made to reform the government ...

And where, in fact, is this excessiveness come from? What root does it grow from? It reminds of itself whenever there is no responsibility for the state and its officials.

Who answered for a shameful provocation with Babitsky?

Who is punished for unreasonable warnings of the TVC that the Pravda Ministry rivets?

Rhetoric questions! And when it is finally managed to prove through the court the lawlessness of the prosecutor's office, the efforts of state minds were aimed at refuting the court decision.

The demand for excessiveness is great where the problem is being solved: everyone from small to great execute the team: “To the leg!” Those who are not ready for this doom themselves to tests, which, when the advancing regime, will not seem excessive.

Do the media want to maintain independence? So, it's time to start their elimination - they are now striving to eradicate NTV. And getting rid of rebellious structures, according to the logic of struggle, inevitably leads to the elimination of an independent person. And hello to you from the unforgettable Joseph Vissarionovich, in whose birthday was the glasses in the office of V.V. Putin heads of deputy factions. True, without Grigory Yavlinsky: he did not want to participate in this.

It remains for us to answer two sacramental questions for Russian society. Who is to blame that we have such a president? And what if he is?

However, the first question is more likely to be designed for the traditional languor of the Russian soul. Summer will pass soon, and we will lay out the solitaires with long winter evenings: did the president know, guess or meant? He leaves hats in his snow on the snow or is dancing to the music from the Glot-9? And only by spring, most likely, we’ll figure out that we chose to rule the state, with permission to say, a leader who was never elected as a deputy of the district council.

And what to do now?

Confronting all acceptable forms of the onset and triumph of the anti -democratic regime. And no one will remain lonely in this. The nonsense that accompany the actions of the current leaders of the state, with amazing speed, add up a protest opposition. Recent events forced the bankers to unite, brought the journalists closer, again raised many people to rallies.

Although, to be honest, so far we have achieved little. In the government, people remain, for a long time already morally decapitated. But, you must admit, at the same time: the decisive public opinion does not work out on one day. Remember how long we moved by eighty -fifth year, achieving an hour of change. He will break through in the present life. A leader who is not counted with public opinion has never been prosperous. And not from a good life, believe me, I had to change the preventive measure for the head of the media holding.