LESSONS OF A DEVIANT

Mikhail Zaborov

LESSONS OF A DEVIANT TO LACANE

New, evolutionary psychoanalysis

The sage Lacan said that sexual desire is always directed towards another. It seems self-evident: he wants her, she wants him, what is there to prove? And if I say that a bully, a deviant voyeur, teaches us something completely different, teaches us lessons about the harmony of the world, then it will sound like absurdity.

And yet I choose absurdity.

It's simple: one day come with a friend to the deserted Israeli shore and start your caresses, but at the same time look towards the mountainous shore strewn with huge stones. A head will poke out from behind every stone - these are voyeurs. In terrible heat, they sit behind the stones and wait for sexual scenes, and when such a scene occurs, they get excited and masturbate behind the stones. This is the lesson of the voyeur that we will try to learn.

Freud + Lacan = 0.5 Newton

Almost a mathematical formula, it certainly requires clarification. Newton discovered the law of universal gravitation, which later became known as gravity. Newton's name is better because universal gravitation is not only gravity, universal gravitation is a metaphysical principle that manifests itself in different forms: physical, mental, social gravity.

A fundamentally different type of attraction-repulsion is polar electric interactions.

And finally, induction, which may or may not be related to gravity, which is very important for us.

Just as sunlight, falling on different objects, appears sometimes red, sometimes blue, green... so metaphysical gravity manifests itself differently in different spheres, but this is a single principle of universal gravitation.

What does this mean for psychology? Fundamental, because psychic forces are in many ways subject to the same laws as physical ones, to the point that psychoanalysis can be projected into space to reveal the Freudian-Lacanian error:

Newton discovered the planet's gravitation towards the sun (“libido”) This desire, like all forces, is invisible “secretly”. Human aspirations are of course much more complex, but it is interesting that they are largely hidden, and everything that psychoanalysis does, it tries to make the secret explicit. We can say that psychoanalysis is always dealing with universal gravitation in its psychic form - Newton performed a “psychoanalysis” of the cosmios! But Newton went much further: yes, the planet tends to the sun, but it does not fall on the sun, because its movement creates a centrifugal force and, as a result, a

circular (elliptical) movement. The circular orbits of the planets are close to parallel, they do not interfere, and this circular parallelism is the basis of universal harmony.

But where did we hear this word parallelism? Oh yes, it was “spoken” silently by a voyeur; he experiences his sex in parallel with those whom he contemplates, thereby affirming the principle of parallelism in sex and in psychology in general, and I dare to say that, as in space, parallelism is the basis of human-spiritual harmony - here is a deviant’s lesson about world harmony.

Neither Freud, nor Lacan, nor millions of Lacanians learned this lesson. So I say that Freudianism-Lacanism = half of Newton, he deals with: aspiration, gravitation, libido, lust, desire - deals with universal gravitation in its psychological form, but Freudian-Lacanianists do not have the slightest idea about world parallelism and thus lose only half the world. This is the psychoanalytic dinosaur, unnoticed and unnoticed by psychoanalysis, because Freud closely studied the childhood of the individual, but did not think at all about the childhood of life itself on earth, and about its homeland - the ocean. But Lacan, he reads Freud like the bible, cannot add anything of his own; where can his epigones, who read Lacan like the bible, do this?

But not only the voyeur teaches us a world parallel, you and I do it no worse, without noticing it ourselves.

There are 2 types of parallelism in nature: 1. Newtonian-gravitational-cosmic, circular, organically connected with attraction - gravity. 2. But there is also electromagnetic parallelism - induction (transmitter-receiver) there is no attraction here, but a parallel process (music) is transmitted from the transmitter to the receiver!

The psychological manifestations of these two types of parallelism are enormous: gravitational parallelism dominates our lives in its own way, disinterested inductive parallelism dominates in another way, for example in art (Disinterested contemplation according to Kant). But this is all immeasurably more complicated, which is reflected in my other articles, I will cite at least one of them SOCIAL PHYSICS it talks about social gravity, only indirectly related to psychology.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G9×4Fde9KhUcDAuhRHS_MKsj2Xom6pIeZ2tI6BSvkZM/edit?usp=sharing

1. A man desires a woman, what does he usually do? He begins to care for her. This is a rotation around it, as in space. Then there is physical contact

(This does not exist in space, but it exists in microcosm, which requires a separate discussion.) A family arises, and this is a continuous circle around each other - parallelism - family harmony based on the sexual attraction of parents - a cosmic principle. Attraction + rotation = the principle of harmony in space and in human relationships!

2. With voyeurism there is no attraction to those being contemplated; the principle of attraction is not at work here, but the principle of infection, mental induction: They experience sex, and this experience excites him. For him, to feel means to sympathize, without this SO there is no stimulus and feeling, that is, life itself! You can understand why he sits so patiently behind a stone for hours!

So, we see the “parallel” movement of bodies, and Freudianism did not clearly understand the principle of parallelism, having lost the psychoanalytic dinosaurs. We do not see the forces that connect bodies, and Freudianism is focused on the study of these forces: aspirations, desires, which are largely secret.

But there is another invisible reality, perhaps the most important, it can be called “the state of the system.” The fact is that the system is an integrity, not only bodies move in it, the whole system, its state changes every second. This state of the family, for example, can be harmonious - love, less harmonious - cold relationships, etc. It is important to emphasize here that without understanding the universal parallelism, Freudianism did not understand such cardinal phenomena as love, friendship and thousands of intermediate states, because it tried to explain everything with sex.

Sex really represents a couple’s desire for each other, but love cannot be understood without parallels: everything is built according to a cosmic principle: there is a man’s desire for a woman, but they live side by side, in parallel, thus parallelism and mutual attraction-interpenetration of souls are combined - this is harmony according to the Newtonian principle and this is love. There is more parallelism here, because people have sex from time to time, but love is continuous.

When we talk about the combination of attraction and parallelism in human relationships, then words such as empathy, sympathy, compassion, solidarity, etc. are more suitable - the great principle of “SO” - together!

In this regard, I propose the article CO=EVERYTHING.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1btraAjU3cZhlHa0lvxko4yjXDCCkeTpQcat1ONsdbog/edit?usp=sharing

Let us emphasize once again: love and sex are not the same thing, they are related, but not identical! Not understanding the difference between the principle of attraction and the principle of circulation, Freudianism falls into fornication.

It all started with Freud being in love with his mother (who doesn't love a mother?). I also loved my mother very much, but there was not an ounce of sexuality in this love. I think it was the same with Freud. But since Freud the theorist cannot distinguish love from sex, he based his psychoanalysis on incest, which is actually imaginary.

Such is the shaky foundation of the majestic temple - psychoanalysis. Thousands of priests serve in this temple, but no one thought to understand its foundation! But suppose that the baby really has sexual feelings for his mother! And so he grew up, got married... he continues to love his mother! What is this also sexual love? Does a mother love her son at any age—also sexually? Do sisters love each other sexually too? We are entering the realm of the absurd! These are the foundations of incestuous psychoanalysis! All this is due to ignorance, lack of knowledge, lack of understanding of the world parallel! Freud + Lacan = half Newton!

But we started with voyeurism - this parallelism is not gravitational, but inductive - without attraction, attraction, what is its role? And this is the love of sisters, the love of a mother for her children, friendship... We treat most people without any sexual desire, but we have a good relationship with them, friendship, even non-sexual love.

There is no clear distinction between platonism and sexism, and sex can be mixed with platonism in different proportions. If sexual love is directed only at some people, then we have platonic relationships with everyone, so it is difficult to overestimate its importance.

Immanuel Kant persistently emphasized the “disinterest” of aesthetic contemplation - this is our inductive parallelism, with it we enter the world of art and culture - an immense world. Let us emphasize that the artist is a sublimated exhibitionist, and the viewer is always a voyeur.

With mental induction we enter the world of social psychology, here mental induction acts as a suggestion and this is a decisive factor in history, but it requires a separate discussion, partly this problem is discussed in the above article SOCIAL PHYSICS read.

In the meantime, you can finish the voyeur lesson.

Exhibitionist lesson

A strange phenomenon: An exhibitionist meets a woman in a comfortable, or not so, or completely uncomfortable place, exposes his genitals and masturbates. This is very dangerous for him, how many people have lost their honor, career, freedom, and among them there are very respectable people. Consider the recent scandal in Hollywood!

In my book “Sadomoralism” I remembered a small newspaper article, which indifferently reported on a “small” tragedy: the suicide in prison of a young exhibitionist. I remembered this note when I had a chance to visit a nudist beach on the French Riviera. Thousands of nudists come here from thousands of miles away, all of them, whole families, young and old, walk, swim, play ball - everyone is naked and nudity does not bother anyone, does not corrupt them morally - a return to earthly paradise!

Thousands of nudists - thousands of proofs that nudity is harmless! And at the same time, for the same nudity a person is seized, thrown into prison, tortured (by the criminals themselves), leading to suicide, as if there are thousands of proofs of the terrible harm of nudity! Man is the likeness of God = the likeness of the devil?

Everything here is ridiculous, and the disastrous passion of an exhibitionist, who receives nothing from a woman except a LOOK, not a single touch! And no less passionate hatred of judges and criminals towards him. This absurdity requires our understanding, otherwise it humiliates not only the violators, but also humiliates the intelligentsia of a normal person who puts up with absurdity in his highly civilized society!

LOOK = LIFE and DEATH, how can you not be amazed by the magical power of the human gaze? There is truly something superhuman here!

There is only one explanation: After all, when an exhibitionist meets a woman, exactly what fish do for billions of years happens: they meet in a certain place and ejaculate at the sight of each other! The most ancient sexual act is the first instinct of life. Here the touch of God gave earthly life even in the ocean!

(The initial importance of this instinct is easy to understand, but Freud asked himself the question: how is the memory of the murder of the patriarchal father preserved for centuries? I have an even more difficult question: how was the memory of the primary love of the ocean preserved in our subconscious for billions of years? But it was preserved and retained its colossal power, as if the ocean was yesterday, but it is not today.)

And this divine moment - the most primary, archetypal sexual act, the source of life, turned into the most base, despicable, shameful, criminal...!

If you carefully read the myth of the creation of the world, you will see how during one story the great god, the creator of the universe, turns into a vile serpent, because the power-religion has changed. Anyone who doesn’t understand this, I suggest you read my text

"THE EIGHTH DAY OF CREATION"

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OTPAaGZvY_nmWHwQ0uozxVDKwkEG3KUTflYlEaNE6RA/edit?usp=sharing

So, the same transformation occurred with the very first, life-giving and therefore divine act, and I will blow your mind if I say that this act remains just as divine today! Why?

Our sexual relationships are very individual: I love Marya, I don’t like Daria, I love Sofa a little, etc. And it’s interesting that the exhibitionist doesn’t care what kind of woman is in front of him: Daria, Marya, beautiful, ugly, young, old... This is usually seen as the moral degradation of the deviant! But it's the other way around! He sees in a woman not an individuality, but only a woman - the feminine principle - a GODDESS and his masturbation is a passionate worship of the goddess! This is not a religion, but it is a prayer-worship dictated by God himself, which means it is the first pre-religion from which all religions will come! Then paganism will come, in which Eros is god, and then monotheism, in which Eros is the devil. The development of culture appears as the development of forms of regulation and suppression of sex - a fig civilization. Many centuries will pass, and there will be a persistent need for the coming of the Messiah-Freud and psychoanalysis, which will dig up and reveal suppressed instincts, at least for their awareness.

According to Hegel, conscious necessity is already freedom?! No, but awareness is the way to solve the problem. Although Freud spoke out against gloomy sexual prohibitions, Freudians do not wage a consistent fight against fig civilization; they turned psychoanalysis into a form of literature and scholasticism and are enthusiastically engaged in this among themselves

“And the street is writhing, tongueless,” as Mayakovsky said.

The bullshit ban is a fatal cutting off of body language, the trauma it inflicted on our souls has not been seriously studied by anyone, and it requires deep understanding

But scholastic psychoanalysis does not yet look in this direction. My many years of futile attempts to draw attention to the problem do not even receive a response from official bodies and websites; these intellectual usurpers “with the learned air of an expert remain silent in an important dispute.”

And only millions of “fig fighters” - nudist exvoyeurs, languishing in their home or public prisons, open a peephole to the ocean of human suffering!

.