Ecology and slavery

Ecology and slavery

I go out to Lake Kratovo after the weekend. Garbage. Where they rested, they left everything there. And then they came to the same places to sunbathe and were indignant about why it was so dirty. Well, yes, yesterday it wasn’t them, others, pigs, but these are neat ones, they don’t leave dirt behind them, they are only indignant at other people’s piggishness. As do I, by the way. He’s also not without sin, more than once he buried a cigarette butt in the sand so as not to put it in the trash.

Why is it clean abroad? Do they clean more and not litter as much? A German friend of mine here came to visit me, admired our lake and was amazed at the dirt, and at the Generalsky Quarry, a garbage dump right on the beach almost made him feel sick. “In Germany there would be such places...”, Ulrich began, but I stopped him: “This is not Germany, get used to it.”

I recently interviewed a biologist who deals with environmental issues and asked him: “Why do we treat our nature this way? Maybe because there is too much land and such beautiful places?” “No, the point is that we are slaves, and slaves have nothing of their own,” the scientist answered. And he explained: “Serfdom, the majority of the population is in slavery. Then socialism, where again everything around is collective farm. My apartment is clean, but there’s a garbage dump in the entrance, because the entrance is shared, not mine.”

Here is Lake Kratovo - it seems to be ours, but it seems not. It is not officially considered a recreation area, so there are no toilets. And if there is no toilet on the shore, where does everyone go? And then we swim there. Why not declare such a beautiful place a recreation area and provide normal infrastructure? No money? But there is so much more. Does this mean it's not important? But what could be more important than the nature that surrounds us? The slave policy is no longer of ordinary vacationers, but of local authorities.