Nina SHAPOVALOVA's predictions continue to come true

I SAID THIS, I WARNED THIS

When your predictions come true, you always feel a little awkward. Especially when these predictions are not pleasant. In the last issue we wrote that, according to the theory developed by Nina Sergeevna Shapovalova, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, in the near future, more precisely on March 8th, serious disasters await us. Unfortunately, this forecast came true in full. That is why we decided to return to this topic and talk about it in more detail.

Nobody likes grief-stricken people. And really, why should you disturb someone else’s peace, why shout that the house was built on sand, that the bridge has stood without major repairs for twice as long as it should, that the plane is about to fall apart, and your heart is about to fail? How nice it is to sit and know nothing! After all, in fact, for a dead person, it doesn’t matter what he died from - whether from a fallen ceiling, from a broken motor, or from a stopped heart. All the same - in the event that nothing could be prevented. What if it is possible?

In the last issue we published a short material under the heading “The next cataclysm will take place on the fourth of April.” And, as they say, we hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately. True, we have not yet made it to the fourth or fourth, but the first point of the predictions - about the eighth of March - worked to its fullest. Happened: a mine explosion in Kuzbass, a car accident in Los Angeles, a train collision in Japan, a huge number of car accidents in Moscow, the eruption of Etna and many more similar things. And as a logical conclusion - the death of the Yak-40 plane (on the morning of the 9th) with Artem Borovik and Ziya Bazhaev on board.

I met Nina Sergeevna at the Physics Faculty of Moscow State University, where she came to a meeting dedicated to the procedure for nominating a series of works by some academic team for the State Prize. There were quite a lot of people in the large streaming audience, all academicians, professors, doctors of sciences, in short, honorary, respected people. Everything is orderly, nobly, the report, the debate, everything goes on as usual, no one gets into trouble, no one makes trouble, no one pours mineral water from a glass on opponents, in short, peace and quiet, and God’s grace. And I didn’t immediately understand where this woman came from, who like a whirlwind broke through to the podium and attacked the applicants with a whole hail of questions. To be honest, I am not particularly strong in meteorophysics and the nature of earthly magnetism, so the meaning of the questions was not entirely clear to me, but the energy and pressure of the fragile lady surprised me.

“No, you understand,” she explained to me later, as if making excuses, “I’m not at all against them receiving the prize; on the contrary, I’m in favor with both hands.” Now our science is dragging out such a miserable existence that every handout from the state, even undeserved, can only be welcomed. And they deserve this award. But I wanted to draw their attention to what they haven’t done and, apparently, don’t want to do!

The academics did not tear apart the lone opponent. They did a much simpler thing: they IGNORED her. They didn't even answer the questions asked. Well, rather than arguing, it’s always easier to make your opponent look crazy and make fun of him from the sidelines to your heart’s content.

Meanwhile, there really is some truth in their attitude towards the senior researcher at the Hydrometeorological Center, Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nina Sergeevna Shapovalova - she is really crazy. Wasn’t Einstein crazy, because only a schizophrenic could figure out that space is curved? And Newton was crazy when he discovered the law of universal gravitation. And Archimedes was a madman when he ran naked through Syracuse, scaring civilians with the cry: “Eureka!” Why go far, those same academicians were also crazy not so long ago, otherwise they would not have been able to become what they became. Science has always been moved forward not by normal, balanced and calm people, no, it has moved and is moving solely due to the energy of the restless, who do not believe in any authority, always ready to overthrow the most fundamental laws of madmen.

“I feel sorry for you,” Academician Sargsyan said to Nina Sergeevna after the speech.

“And for me, you,” she answered him.

THE EARTH IS LIKE PEOPLE...

“You know,” said Nina Sergeevna, pouring me tea into a huge red mug, “after all, most of them, I mean academicians, not only cannot, but do not even want to understand what I am saying.” But again it's not their fault. Academician Marchuk told me: “What you are talking about is extremely interesting, but I am afraid that I will no longer be able to cope with it.” He is seventy-five years old. And I decided to scare him: “You don’t know when you’ll die, but I know. I know about all the politicians, when they die, about writers, about scientists...” They almost all believe that the Earth is a dead body. And the Earth is a living organism, and we are all parts of this organism.

I didn’t come to this right away, my husband helped. He’s a smart guy, a doctor of science, and he studies the rotation of the Earth. This is precisely what won me over. We met on the ski track. I was working at the Ostankino Tower then, and he had just come to us at Hydromet. He and I went skiing together once, and I thought about him: “What a man! Wow, the Earth rotates!” I have always had a feeling of planetarism, but to reach such impudence as to rotate the Earth...

As I already said in the previous article, our planet does not rotate as evenly as it seems. There are clearly established and strictly calculated periods of acceleration and deceleration. Acceleration, braking, low acceleration, low braking... The Earth owes this unevenness to the Moon. During the big acceleration, it is located above the Northern Hemisphere, on which a large mass is concentrated, as a result of which the influence of the Moon on the Earth is more noticeable than when it is above the Southern Hemisphere.

You took physics at school, which means you know that acceleration is nothing more than the absorption and build-up of internal energy, while braking is, on the contrary, the release of this energy into space. Do you feel where I'm going with this? The earth is BREATHING. Acceleration - absorption of energy - inhale, braking - release of energy - exhale. When the Earth takes a breath, so does everything that lives on it. After all, everything, including animals and humans, both absorbs energy and releases it. So, at the inhalation stage, MORE is absorbed than is released. As you exhale, it’s the other way around. As soon as the Earth begins to accelerate, we all immediately begin to accumulate energy.

I believe that the only parameter that controls our basic life processes is either the acceleration or deceleration of the Earth’s rotation. Let’s say, from this second the Earth began to accelerate - and all processes on Earth began to flow differently, EVERYTHING, from the functioning of your DNA to the movement of the Earth’s poles.

— Is the Earth's pole drifting?

- But of course! It staggers, constantly deviates from the axis of rotation. And the higher the rotation speed, the closer its position is to the ideal. But this is understandable, remember a children's top: when it spins at maximum speed, it stands almost vertically, and the lower its speed, the more it begins to swing to the sides.

People must learn to use the idea of energy inflows and outflows usefully. If they don't pay attention to this, then they simply die. There is a process of intake going on, there is a sea of energy all around. It seethes, seethes, plays. People are electrified, excited, they punch each other in the face, fight, climb the barricades. And this energy must be saved. Save, if only because immediately after the period of accumulation of energy, a decline will inevitably follow, a period of its return, and it will be bad for those who have little of it.

WHY DON'T PLANES FLY LIKE BIRDS?

- Well, okay, people... And why do planes suddenly fall with joy?

— On June 10, 1998, I don’t remember where exactly, a Su-27 military plane crashed into a swamp. The disaster occurred unexpectedly: just now the pilot, by the way an experienced pilot, deputy squadron commander, was talking on the radio, everything was fine on board, when suddenly the connection with the plane was lost, and after a couple of seconds it disappeared from the radar screen. Everything happened so quickly that the pilot did not even have time to eject. Moreover, when the cause of the accident was being investigated, the meteorological version was not even considered. Well, really, what kind of meteorology is there when the sky in the area of the accident was absolutely clear, without a single cloud.

By the way, in the heart of an anticyclone the sky is usually clear. Indeed, if we look at the weather map of that time, we will see that it was in this place that there was a strong anticyclone at that time. It must be said that an anticyclone differs from a cyclone not only in that it swirls clockwise and not counterclockwise, but also in that it creates downward vertical flows, while a cyclone, on the contrary, pulls upward. Here the rule of the gimlet works fully: twist to the right - we fall down, twist to the left - we fly up.

Here are several more useful properties of the anticyclone: firstly, it ventilates the earth's surface well, dragging cold fresh air from the upper layers of the atmosphere to it, and secondly - and I have been trying to break through this idea for a long time - dragging huge masses of negatively charged air to the earth's surface. ozone, the anticyclone gives the Earth an additional electrical charge, which it loses when braking. The fact that the Earth loses charge when braking has been known for a long time and is almost not disputed. But there is no consensus on how she gets this charge. And my model seems quite plausible to me.

But let's get back to the plane. Flying through the center of the anticyclone, it: a) falls into a falling vertical stream of air and b) into a strong energy flow. Instruments fail, engines break down, and the plane crashes. Everything is just scary...

And what’s also scary is that flight maps are still compiled without taking anticyclones into account. You can’t lure a pilot into a thundercloud with any money, but into an anticyclone - please, even now.

— What air currents blow trains off the rails?

— Of course, horizontal. Although in the case of trains, the main importance is not even the natural, but the human factor. Imagine: energy decline, maximum energy discharge, people devastated and tired. Attention is zero, composure is at a minimum, and therefore there is a maximum of emergency situations both on the ground and in the air.

“SHOULDN'T YOU BEND TO A CHANGING WORLD”?

Academician Amosov, who studied the heart all his life, came very close to the problem of the supply and expenditure of vital energy, but never revealed it. He was interested in what is more important: to be able to efficiently store energy or to be able to spend it effectively? And so he trained all his life, trying to expand the range of energy expenditure as much as possible, so that a person could feed on the energy accumulated by training for a long time.

But everything turns out to be much simpler. Here is the idol of many generations, Andrei Makarevich, singing: “We shouldn’t bend to the changing world, let it bend to us better!” There is no need, no need to wait for the world to cave in. If he caves, we will be gone! We must live in harmony with the world.

The environment around us lives in rhythms; in this environment there is sometimes more energy, sometimes less. When there is a lot of energy, we take advantage of this and use the excess energy to restructure the body itself. And when there is little energy, the main thing is to be able to spend it correctly. If the system can do this, then it is stable.

Valery CHUMAKOV

06.01 - Makhmud Esambaev died; 19.01 - split in the Duma, an unprecedented hailstorm in Spain, Isabella Yuryeva died; 02.02 - two plane crashes - in Africa and in the USA; 16.02 - Douglas plane crash. 14.01 - earthquake in China; 25.01 - train accident in Novgorod; 10.02 - explosion of pyrotechnics in Novosibirsk, unprecedented hail in Italy (ice blocks up to 5 kg); 20.02 - Anatoly Sobchak died of a heart attack, Arkady Khait died of a heart attack, fires in St. Petersburg; 06.03 - a passenger plane crashed during takeoff in Los Angeles; 03/07 - mine explosion in Kuzbass; 03/08 - train accident in Japan - collision of two trains; 08.03 - massive car accidents in Moscow; 08.03 - man-made accident in Rio de Janeiro - release of poisoned water into the ocean; 08.03 - eruption of Mount Etna; 09.03 - a bus slipped off the road in Las Vegas, 9 people died; 09.03 - in the morning, a Yak-40 plane crashed while taking off from a height of 50 meters, first class pilot Yakushkin, 45 years old, among the dead were the famous journalist Artem Borovik and the head of the Alliance Group JSC holding Ziya Bazhaev