Ivan Davydov. Interpol, issue twenty-two: Operation plan to undermine the moral potential of the fatherland

Interpol, issue twenty-two: Operation plan to undermine the moral potential of the fatherland
Ivan Davydov

Date of publication: September 15, 2000

Prelude: Dorenko, FSB and Swiss watches

Sergei Dorenko remained newsmaker number one throughout the week. The sufferings (this is the style in Russian folk country music, if anyone doesn’t know) were performed by a choir of fighters for freedom of speech under the leadership of a disgraced TV presenter, although without a teleharmony, but so harmoniously that thoughts about feudal loyalty were replaced by others - about a well-thought-out campaign.

That is, the theory of feudal loyalty of the vassal to the master should not be excluded. Quite the contrary. The question is: to what extent have other vassals rebuilt in accordance with the trends of the era of underdeveloped capitalism? Interesting, for example, is the true role of Mr. Ernst in the next act of tragedy about the death of freedom of speech.

Let's see what we have.

Dorenko’s version: the program was closed by Ernst on the direct orders of Putin. Putin also put pressure on Dorenko, but he is not the kind of person to give in. I ate a kolobok for nothing at one time (it turned out very ambiguously - everyone knows that it was not for nothing). “Conversations with Putin” (Dorenko’s version) are so beautiful that they are worth quoting:

“Putin first called me just to talk in September last year, it was a meeting. To tell the truth, I took a camera with me, I didn’t understand why a journalist could be called just to talk. I had two cameramen with two cameras in the car, and I said, “Is this an interview? I'm ready...” He said, “No, I just wanted to talk.” I said, “Just talk? Well, say, I’ll listen then... Well, actually, I said, it’s Saturday, and I need to write, and in general, I thought it was an interview. “And we talked . ”

Some kind of Putin (by the way, who is this?) calls Dorenko himself , takes him away from his work, you see, he wanted to talk...

And the second fragment, a subtle haberdashery-psychological observation:

“Vladimir Vladimirovich, in your actions I see duality. I understand you very well, because you know how to please the audience, you say one thing in one audience, another in another and... You know how to soak in people. This is important. But I see in front of me, looking at you, two people: one of them wears a Patek Philippe, the other wears FSB shoulder straps. Which one is real? I don’t know . "

Still, Dorenko is very talented. It is what it is, as the minor and unpleasant hero of a famous action movie said on another occasion.

This is the story as presented by Dorenko . Putin and Ernst, unfortunately, are silent. It would be interesting to hear what they think about all this.

Why shouldn't we believe Sergei Leonidovich? A man of crystal honesty, the truth, the truth, nothing but the truth, Yuri Mikhailovich Luzhkov will readily confirm.

Let's look at the background. Against the backdrop of the tragedy of Dorenko and the forty million (according to Dorenko) army of his fans, his owner (remember the feudal model) is rushing about, trying to save ORT shares. And he finds a good option - dispersing shares among the scandalous, noisy, well-known creative intelligentsia here and in the West. While maintaining leverage, and ultimately property. The pretext is a threat to freedom of speech. The ideal situation for the owner in this situation would be an attempt to attack freedom of speech by the authorities. And here you go - there is a try!

From which we conclude that either Putin is in league with Berezovsky, or Dorenko is with Ernst (then everything becomes clear with Ernst’s role, his position is generally excellent: there was no order to ban, there was a telephone conversation shown - by accident, of course, by accident! - on NTV, and if anything, Mr. Ernst was just helping the children ), or they were all at the same time. Which version is more likely - judge for yourself. Ah, the guys are sad without elections, so they promote everything that moves, including themselves.

It is also interesting how the positions of different people change in a short time. Not long ago, the Union of Journalists expelled Dorenko from its pure ranks in disgrace. For which it was aptly called a brothel at the mayor's office. And now they are protecting us . Maybe they’ll give you some kind of order, if they have one...

But the positions of Internet users do not change at all: read the reviews of the transcript of Dorenko’s press conference. No matter what happens in the world, a certain percentage of citizens continue to beat the Jews and save Russia. A holy cause, like alpine begging.

Meanwhile, an open letter to the president was published on Dorenko's website . The collection of signatures is in full swing.

I still remember something like this . Colleagues, are you alive? Should I update something...

And the homeland is in danger

that had been gathering dust in the archives almost since June The President, meanwhile, became concerned about the information security of his fatherland and signed a document . A certain part of the citizens, especially the literate ones, read in advance from this paper new attacks on any and all freedoms. Others even started talking about censorship on the Internet (the word “Internet,” by the way, is absent from the document). It is unclear where such specific conclusions from the watery abstract paper come from.

Some places, however, are alarming.

a) There is a clear overkill with patriotism and spirituality. These are good things, but you need to be careful with them. has long and zealously defended spirituality from alien machinations And then, the newspaper “Zavtra” . Maybe they can survive without government assistance?

b) An extremely dubious quote (from an extensive list of “types of information security threats”):

“...devaluation of spiritual values, propaganda of mass culture models based on the cult of violence, on spiritual and moral values ​​that contradict the values ​​​​accepted in Russian society;

a decrease in the spiritual, moral and creative potential of the Russian population, which will significantly complicate the preparation of labor resources for the introduction and use of the latest technologies, including information technologies."

This is, of course, a declaration of intent, and ninety percent, almost like a person, is made of water. And from the waters of sweet liberalism. But such fragments leave rich possibilities for interpretation. In general, it is foolish to suspect, according to a long-standing domestic tradition, that the authorities want to annoy and poison the lives of citizens in every possible way. Most likely, the relatively common passages of “power” rhetoric, stuck to the languages ​​of government officials in the era of permanent election campaigns, were simply automatically copied. But the drafters of the document must be aware: there are more than enough people who want to interpret this kind of blunders in the most unfavorable way for the authorities under the current conditions. And they have already started. You need to be more careful when using the copy-paste function.

Here, for example, are a number of questions in connection with the above quotes:

It is not clear whether propaganda of samples of culture based on the cult of violence is allowed, but not mass culture, but elitist culture?

Are the samples themselves allowed (with propaganda clear)?

Where is the list of values ​​​​accepted in Russian society published (just to check periodically)?

A very specific example: the second and third volumes of de Sade’s ten-volume academic work were published. On the one hand, the cover is calico, there are a hundred pages of notes, the translations are brilliant - that is, the culture is clearly not mass culture. On the other hand, during a spontaneous discussion, an unnamed but prominent network figure and secretary of an even more prominent network figure made the following (quote) statement: “Loving women (the text is softened) with the help of wooden devices and at the same time talking about smart things is clearly contrary to accepted values ​​in Russian society . " And really, okay, women, okay, devices, but talking about smart things is frankly overkill.

An amateur example: are the works of Bishop Berkeley now banned? Somehow I don’t remember domestic preachers of solipsism (Shpet? Well, relatively speaking). Ergo, these values ​​are not accepted among us.

It is also unclear whether, for example, meeting the first person you come across in some nightclub and with undisguised goals is an act aimed at reducing the moral potential of the homeland.

And shouldn’t we close this entire Internet out of harm’s way?

However, I think it will soon close itself due to a deep systemic crisis. But about the systemic crisis another time: the mood is not the same after reading such a comprehensive document. They have led into sin, the damned, they spit on the moral potential of relatively young specialists. Should I go to a club or something, in “Traffic” ... there must be a disco

But before that, let’s save what is not completed and take it with us, thereby committing an act that is classified in the epoch-making document as follows:

"Destruction, damage, destruction or theft of computer and other storage media" .

Also, by the way, a threat.

And one more, hmm, bead.

Not made by hands and will not be overgrown

has appeared on the KSU website (formerly the Moscow swimming pool) A memorial page for the Kursk nuclear submarine . And I once again experienced an angry irritation, akin to the one that did not leave me during the days of general hysteria on the corresponding occasion. And I tried to analyze what actually irritates me about this and other online monuments? A monument is a good thing. He does not resurrect the dead, but sometimes he changes something in the living (especially if not the work of the sculptor Tsereteli). So, street monuments are usually not covered with banners. And they don’t hang their advertisements in public places. And I came to this memorable page just from the banner. There is a deeper problem here than meets the eye. But there’s no time to formulate it. I’m going to undermine the potential and encroach on security. Blame the Security Council (or thank whoever likes it).

But don’t go here , they contradict the doctrine here.