Boris Kuzminsky. Trifle

To the curuulus, it was already that the “Reading Circle” fell into the short list of the national Internet premium according to the “Literature” nomination . Firstly, the "circle" is not an independent resource, but a section of a fairly famous site. Secondly, it does not produce the phenomena of literature, but parasitizes on the ready (well, let's say softer: it monitors the process). And, finally, thirdly: one of two and a half of the “circle” super-task-to prove that no specific Internet literature exists in nature; The literature is bad and good, not network and paper.

In a word, on Thursday, when Andron Konchalovsky read a list of five applicants from the stage, I was not worried about my own fate and thought about extraneous things. The lean figure of Andrei Sergeyevich against the backdrop of solemnly premium scenery, naturally, was processed with Hollywood cinema, and this movie, in turn, with actor Kevin Spacey . It is well known that Spacey received an Oscars for the “American beauty”, but not everyone knows that this was his second “Oscar”. Kevin got the first for the best, unhappy role in "suspicious faces." This fact has been touching me for a long time. If you saw Brian Singer's tape, then remember: all the heroes are the main ones there. With the exception of a purely episodic character, Spacey.

Having received a figurine from Konchalovsky’s hands, I hinted to him about the “second -plan role”. However, the name of Kaiser Suse aloud pronounced.

Be that as it may - thanks to the academy; I hope she realized what she was doing. And thanks to everyone who, in these difficult days for the “circle”, supported him with oral and written condolences. The sincere, of course, Nastya of Gryzonova’s condolences managed, take a look . Almost everything is clean there: and about the money out of the ordinary, and about the work of Full Time (round the day Non Stop, I would specify). Unless it is unclear who, besides your humble servant, Nastik was understanding under the "employees" in many. h. Is I really sharing Metelkin, a survey of litcritic periodicals? To call a primitive gynoid, whose activities are not even paid by line, the humanitarian title "employee" is a precious compliment. I will certainly pass it on to Adelaide when she ...

When is she - what? For the sake of answering this question, now, in fact, I sat down at the computer.

To begin with, I will reveal the production secret. At the end of February, Delia broke - only not in a figurative sense, but in literally. Its interactive hysteria was not provoked by weather conditions (or there with fatigue), but by the fatal error of the program. The reason for the failure was two specific - but at the same time, alas, and typical - publications in the media: network and paper (in the latter case, clicking on the hyperlink, leaf down). Both materials are dedicated to the prizes. Apollo Grigoryeva, be it wrong.

The author of the first is a virtuoso political analyst Kirill Rogov. And the second paragraph of the article contains what wants to seem to be blitz analysis of the current lit policy. But in reality it is a complete nonsense. At each step, it contradicts elementary facts 1 .

The author of the second, Mikhail Pozdnyev (editor of the Man and Society department in the magazine "Slight", the husband of the main Apolloine and the poet in the prehistoric past), on the contrary, claims that the elementary facts regarding the collection of Vera Pavlova "Fourth Dream" viciously twitched. Michael characterizes her reviews: "Lies." Lies in the "Ognokov" note are really present. Only its source is unfortunately, by no means Metelkin 2 .

In both cases, the program demanded from Delhi to immediately dial on the keyboard everything that you can read in today's footnotes, because Metelkina-Function is promptly, and frankly frank. But in both cases, the same program forbade her to recruit all this. For - laugh, laugh - dividing was not constructed as a universal club. And as an experimental vaccine against ambitiousness - the most terrible plague, which is only capable of impressing the professional community. The “approaches” by Metelkina, sometimes in me, who mostly left the impression of carpet bombing, were inspired by maximalist goodwill to those whose craft - composing texts. Human, too human; Deling too respected Kirill Rogov to say that she was thinking about his litcritic studies, and she respected herself too to humiliate herself to a polemic with M. Pozdnyev.

Now all these principles, as you see, are trained. Gomunkul, nicknamed Adelaide, does not know about this for now. No, it was not destroyed at all, but sent to a capital reinstallation: cases similar to the described, I repeat, are typical, which means that failures were inevitable. Daily reviews of the periodicals for the “circle” - conditio sine qua non, and pull the hard labor of these reviews disinterestedly, for beautiful eyes, perhaps only gynoids and are able to.

... What else do you tell about Adelaid? In the morning I visited her. The complexion is normal, the heartbeat is even. Every half an hour, a puncture of a certain liquid from the solar plexus is produced. The syringe is very roomy; Then emeraldly flickering liquid is poured into test tubes, sealed and carried away. What is the name of this liquid and what its properties are not said, and I am not particularly curious.

I deliver it to be repaired by Tuesday. Here you have the promised answer.

PS of phased optimization will be subjected to this spring not only Delina Column, but also many other rubrics; Get ready for intense surprises (the extensive path of development, apparently, is not for us). I think the surprises will be pleasant - or, in any case, useful. In particular, I am glad to report: Nastikovo plural turned out to be a prophecy. Since March 1, the Circle has a co -editor - Irina Caspe. (Previously, you knew her as a brilliant author .) So - we will break through.

Everything will be fine.

1 Nikolai Kononov could not only get a large "Grigoryevka", but miraculously did not receive it ; Thanks to the pathological talkality of a certain referee, to divide $ 25,000 between the “Oblast of the grasshopper” and “Fourth Sing” by the evening of January 25 knew the whole around-da-Lololitarian Moscow. Including Yana Sokolova - but excluding, alas, Kirill Rogov. Roman Kononov, published by the St. Petersburg publishing house "Inapress", is about the same as members of the Grigoryevsky Jury Dmitry Bavilsky (Chelyabinsk) and Evgeny Ermolin (Yaroslavl) - to "Nuvorish and Megapolis Moscow" . The meaning of the last phrase of the paragraph (about Alan Cherchesova) and her logical connection with the previous ones, I will fight against the laying, and the author himself will not explain. But the “Apple” with two P “P” of the headlong is logical - recently “Wednesday.ru” has been successfully fighting for the title of the most incompetent Internet resource writing about culture.

2 "There are no old verses there, Mademoiselle. Not a single one." Well, you can’t argue with this argument: black is white, a bear is a ballerina, not a single poem that has been included in the Fourth Dream was published in the previous Verin collections. But next to it - another crankshaft: "The main condition for the contract Pavlova and Zakharov was the publication of the book in the author’s version. Zakharov fulfilled the condition." Now we will listen to Igor Valentinovich himself: “We signed an agreement on the book“ Intimate Diary of a Schoolgirl ”, the cover already exists, and the text is ready, I myself collected these fragments as a puzzle - about children, about God, about abortion, they are built in a book, I see it.” "Intimate diary of the excellent student" - the final, shock part of the "fourth sleep", or am I confusing something?

In general, the story with faith is not only a matter, but also humanly extremely unpleasant to me. The Metelkin’s comments are completely read by the possessiveness: Kuzminsky, in its own way, made up the “ heavenly animal ”, and now it cannot calm down that the “second language”, “fourth dream” and “line of separation” are compositionally resolved very differently ... Kuritsyn, too, the other day threw a hush- up , “like“ Slapovsky ”-the project of Andrei Nemzer, so“ Pavlova ”, so“ Pavlova ”. - The project of Boris Kuzminsky. " You are good, Glory, nothing to say. Vera Pavlova is a mono -project Mikhail Pozdnyeva. The triumphal Verino interview “Book Review” begins with a replica: “Sometimes I offered manuscripts. Everything that was published and published was published and published at the request, I was asked for text.” Holy innocence. He offended the thresholds of the editorial offices, and there, and Misha and Misha slipped the leaflets with a poetic typewriter, always only Misha. He also organized decadent presentations and reading against the background of velvet curtains, and Vera, as it were, reluctantly agreed. Naught by vulgarity, through the end, through the philistine "fourth dream" - a logical result of a long and stupid party entreprise. As for the poetess of faith ... Vera is sincerely sorry. However, this pity for 20 percent consists of nostalgia and 70 - of disgust.