The death after the interrogation of the former submarine officer Alexander Pumane, who, according to official information, was detained in a car with two mines and a TNT checker and who was not identified by relatives and friends, received a rather strange explanation. Through the channels of the special services, the press began to receive information about the "operational game". The Pumane, according to this version, want to hide for the benefit of further work to expose the terrorist network.
If this is true, then this work raises even more questions than the previous story with the detention of a retired submariner. Indeed, there have already been operational games of this kind in Russia, and more than once. For example, according to some reports, with the body of the terrorist Abu-Bakar after the "Nord-Ost" ("Novaya Gazeta" No. 94 for 2002) - he was "lost" in the morgue so that the official investigation could not find it. With Pasha Tsvetomuzika (who seemed to have been killed) in the case of the Krasnoyarsk businessman Anatoly Bykov. And every time in these games they did not take into account some significant trifle, which threatened with complete failure.
In the story with Color Music, for example, an ordinary ambulance arrived to pick up the “dead”, which under no circumstances carries corpses - this is strictly prohibited according to the instructions. In the story with Abu Bakar, different departments did not seem to coordinate their operational “playing” roles in any way. While some were playing, others in a panic called people to identify the militant who had disappeared from the mortuary.
So in the case of Pumane, little is clear and the traditional inconsistency in the actions of our security forces is not ruled out. It is a well-known truth: any operational game has a specific goal, and is not played just like that, out of love for art. The excitement that these games generate in the media and in society is usually precisely calculated, that is, they give just as much hype as necessary. No more, otherwise every game will turn into chaos.
What do we have in practice? Detention of the person least of all similar to the terrorist. His sudden death after interrogation. Initiation of a criminal case by the Moscow Prosecutor's Office on the fact of this death and unwillingness to initiate a case on terrorism. Finally, the “identification” of the completely mutilated body by the relatives and friends of the deceased, who unanimously claim that this is not Alexander Pumane. And if not him, then who, whom and under what circumstances did he kill?
If it's a game, then it's kind of messy. If you need to imagine that the submariner died "from a heart attack", why put a completely mutilated corpse of a badly beaten man, and even carry out his identification?
Didn't the prosecutor's office notify about such a game? And if not, is there a legal basis for that? After all, a criminal case on the fact of death and further identification of the body is most likely the initiative of the prosecutor's office. And if her powers were not taken into account during the development of the “event”, then the development was idiotic and absolutely illegal, and the event was ineffective. Moreover, it hinders the real investigation into the real fact of the murder.
It is not superfluous to ask about who the performance is aimed at: for example, at the Moscow or St. Petersburg network of terrorists. If they needed to relax and stop being afraid of being hunted, the death of a submariner should not raise questions.
After what happened now (if the terrorists really somehow used Pumane, which is more and more doubtful), they will go deep underground, change passports, passwords and appearances until the next favorable opportunity.
Thoughts after all these reflections arise as follows: either the operational game once again could not be completed, or the mention of it is just the last attempt to somehow justify itself and hide the most unsightly truth.
In any case, the drama that played out before our eyes testifies to at least two circumstances: professionalism tends to zero, and the level of cynicism is close to 100%.
Submariner Alexander Pokrovsky about submariner Alexander Pumane
They wrote to me that the Pumane family received an official call from Moscow and said: the charges of terrorism against Alexander were dropped. His first wife, Natalya, went for identification. But there is nothing to recognize. The "heart attack" of Pumane's body is such that it is no longer a body, but one bloody mess. The scar from appendicitis seems to be in place, but not recognizable. There are crowns, but, it seems, on the wrong teeth. And are there any teeth? Oh my God! A plague on both your houses. They set up a man. They told me: “Well, they would take some bandyugan!”.
The thing is that they did not need a gangster. They needed a clean person. That's where they found him. Something didn't work out for them. Did not work out. And it all started so beautifully: “A new terrorist attack was prevented! .. On the government highway! .. Personally against the president! ..”
The last thing I learned: there was an orientation to the police that on such and such a street in Moscow, almost at such and such a time, such and such a car with explosives. We arrived - it’s definitely worth it, and there is a man in it. The peasant was dragged out, the car was searched - one mine in the wing, the other in the spare wheel. A man mutters something that his friends asked to overtake the car and he does not know anything. A man to the department, and a call to the FSB, from where such a bunch of generals immediately arrive, as if they had not slept at all, as if they were just standing and waiting.
Cops aside, and interrogation for seven hours.
The seven o'clock of Pumane strike with a mortal battle. He died seven hours later.
Come on guys, if you need a terrorist, will you kill him? You will blow off dust particles from him and give him brandy to drink, and your doctor will keep him from hiccups after this brandy does not become ill. They didn't kill the terrorist captured in Beslan. On the contrary, Prosecutor Kolesnikov proudly declared on television that he was "actively cooperating with the investigation." So why didn’t you want “active cooperation” in this case? Maybe it wasn't needed anymore? Maybe "the Moor did the job"? Probably did. He was killed in the same way that only a witness to his own crime is killed.
The daughters of the late Pumane do not go to school now. They are persecuted there, humiliated - they are the children of the "enemy of the people." Journalists attack the house, Pumane's parents are in serious condition. The funeral of Pumane Alexander Gennadievich will be held closer to the weekend.
I would like to thank someone for this.
Thank you Mr President! Excellent oprichnina!