
An anecdote is remembered for everyone, when a logical answer came to the claims of the Western government to some African that they ate their ambassador: "And you will eat ours."
What to do? There is nothing left to follow this advice.
In about the same spirit, there are small diplomatic wars between completely civilized states. Well, of course, thanks to the aforementioned civilization, they do not reach direct anthropophagia. So - they exchange diplomats.
But the latest events related to the beating of Polish diplomats in Moscow return us to the conflict resolution method described at the very beginning.
It is difficult to say that it is behind the beating of Russian teenagers in Warsaw. But as if the incomprehensibility of incidents with the Poles in our capital is the secret of Polyshelin. In all details-the brevity of the intervals between all three acts that have been held within one week, a literal time followed by their Polish event, national selectivity (no similar facts with employees of other representative offices were recorded), the lack of shabbye of the executors of these acts-all this leads to quite unambiguous suspicions. It is difficult, of course, with certainty to argue the presence of a high hand in the organization of all this.
But I am just interesting to the other side of these incidents. The background of the Polish incident is still not entirely clear, but the instant and universal ideologization by our media, political figures and officials undoubtedly served as a kind of provoking trigger of Moscow incidents. Moreover, this kind of almost hysterical escalation of national-state ambitions is characteristic of almost any incident or exacerbation of state relations, from events in a bus to any sports competitions.
Of course, victory or defeat in a football match, not only with us leads to a surge of popular emotions. But if in countries with a sufficiently balanced and echeloned system of personal identifications (family, cultural, religious, professional, club, local, national, state), everything quickly comes into a stable state, then in countries with an unbalanced system this turns into very deplorable and extremist results. This happens when the scorching of the identification space, when only one of the few tough ones remains - national, religious, state or their combination. Let us recall at least the capture of the American embassy in Iran.
For a long time, we have long existed a quite professional exploitation clan of such situations - Zhirinovsky, Mitrofanov, Rogozin, Wulf and many others. They, and our other ideologists, are still pleased to play on these strings, not preoccupied with possible and very closest consequences, which, as a result, they themselves will have to make a mock if history retains them until the time of awareness and the possibilities of such decisions.